Class information for:
Level 1: ROLAND MORRIS DISABILITY QUESTIONNAIRE//RESPONSIVENESS//MINIMUM CLINICALLY IMPORTANT DIFFERENCE

Basic class information
ID Publications Average number
of references		 Avg. shr. active
ref. in WoS
8763 1151 33.4 72%


Bar chart of Publication_year

Last years might be incomplete

Classes in level above (level 2)


ID, lev.
above		 Publications Label for level above
426 15762 LOW BACK PAIN//WHIPLASH//JOURNAL OF MANIPULATIVE AND PHYSIOLOGICAL THERAPEUTICS

Terms with highest relevance score


Rank Term Type of term Relevance score
(tfidf)		 Class's shr.
of term's tot.
occurrences		 Shr. of publ.
in class containing
term		 Num. of
publ. in
class
1 ROLAND MORRIS DISABILITY QUESTIONNAIRE Author keyword 19 63% 2% 19
2 RESPONSIVENESS Author keyword 18 12% 12% 140
3 MINIMUM CLINICALLY IMPORTANT DIFFERENCE Author keyword 16 52% 2% 22
4 OSWESTRY DISABILITY INDEX Author keyword 15 34% 3% 37
5 ROLAND MORRIS QUESTIONNAIRE Author keyword 14 100% 1% 7
6 MINIMAL CLINICALLY IMPORTANT DIFFERENCE Author keyword 12 32% 3% 32
7 FUNCTIONAL RATING INDEX Author keyword 11 100% 1% 6
8 QUEBEC BACK PAIN DISABILITY SCALE Author keyword 11 100% 1% 6
9 ANCHOR BASED METHODS Author keyword 8 70% 1% 7
10 MINIMAL IMPORTANT DIFFERENCE Author keyword 8 35% 2% 19

Web of Science journal categories

Author Key Words


Rank Web of Science journal category Relevance score
(tfidf)		 Class's shr.
of term's tot.
occurrences		 Shr. of publ.
in class containing
term		 Num. of
publ. in
class		 LCSH search Wikipedia search
1 ROLAND MORRIS DISABILITY QUESTIONNAIRE 19 63% 2% 19 Search ROLAND+MORRIS+DISABILITY+QUESTIONNAIRE Search ROLAND+MORRIS+DISABILITY+QUESTIONNAIRE
2 RESPONSIVENESS 18 12% 12% 140 Search RESPONSIVENESS Search RESPONSIVENESS
3 MINIMUM CLINICALLY IMPORTANT DIFFERENCE 16 52% 2% 22 Search MINIMUM+CLINICALLY+IMPORTANT+DIFFERENCE Search MINIMUM+CLINICALLY+IMPORTANT+DIFFERENCE
4 OSWESTRY DISABILITY INDEX 15 34% 3% 37 Search OSWESTRY+DISABILITY+INDEX Search OSWESTRY+DISABILITY+INDEX
5 ROLAND MORRIS QUESTIONNAIRE 14 100% 1% 7 Search ROLAND+MORRIS+QUESTIONNAIRE Search ROLAND+MORRIS+QUESTIONNAIRE
6 MINIMAL CLINICALLY IMPORTANT DIFFERENCE 12 32% 3% 32 Search MINIMAL+CLINICALLY+IMPORTANT+DIFFERENCE Search MINIMAL+CLINICALLY+IMPORTANT+DIFFERENCE
7 FUNCTIONAL RATING INDEX 11 100% 1% 6 Search FUNCTIONAL+RATING+INDEX Search FUNCTIONAL+RATING+INDEX
8 QUEBEC BACK PAIN DISABILITY SCALE 11 100% 1% 6 Search QUEBEC+BACK+PAIN+DISABILITY+SCALE Search QUEBEC+BACK+PAIN+DISABILITY+SCALE
9 ANCHOR BASED METHODS 8 70% 1% 7 Search ANCHOR+BASED+METHODS Search ANCHOR+BASED+METHODS
10 MINIMAL IMPORTANT DIFFERENCE 8 35% 2% 19 Search MINIMAL+IMPORTANT+DIFFERENCE Search MINIMAL+IMPORTANT+DIFFERENCE

Key Words Plus


Rank Web of Science journal category Relevance score
(tfidf)		 Class's shr.
of term's tot.
occurrences		 Shr. of publ.
in class containing
term		 Num. of
publ. in
class
1 HEALTH STATUS MEASURES 25 31% 6% 69
2 ROLAND MORRIS QUESTIONNAIRE 23 70% 2% 19
3 CROSS CULTURAL ADAPTATION 19 16% 10% 112
4 INTRAINDIVIDUAL CHANGES 18 32% 4% 47
5 BACK PAIN QUESTIONNAIRE 14 59% 1% 16
6 OSWESTRY 13 58% 1% 15
7 HAND QUESTIONNAIRE DASH 13 80% 1% 8
8 CLINICALLY IMPORTANT DIFFERENCE 13 18% 6% 64
9 IMPORTANT DIFFERENCE 12 17% 6% 66
10 LONGITUDINAL CONSTRUCT VALIDITY 12 86% 1% 6

Journals

Reviews


Title Publ. year Cit. Active
references		 % act. ref.
to same field
Recommended methods for determining responsiveness and minimally important differences for patient-reported outcomes 2008 365 29 62%
A point of minimal important difference (MID): a critique of terminology and methods 2011 58 47 62%
Why are there different versions of the Oswestry Disability Index? A review 2014 4 7 71%
Understanding the minimum clinically important difference: a review of concepts and methods 2007 187 28 64%
Responsiveness and minimal clinically important difference for pain and disability instruments in low back pain patients 2006 112 91 76%
Interpreting patient-reported outcome results: US FDA guidance and emerging methods 2011 44 8 38%
Measurement properties of the QuickDASH (Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand) outcome measure and cross-cultural adaptations of the QuickDASH: a systematic review 2013 9 43 49%
Patient-reported Outcome Measures in Spine Surgery 2013 13 46 35%
The minimum clinically important difference for EQ-5D index: a critical review 2014 2 26 54%
Upper Extremity-Specific Measures of Disability and Outcomes in Orthopaedic Surgery 2012 24 58 26%

Address terms


Rank Address term Relevance score
(tfidf)		 Class's shr.
of term's tot.
occurrences		 Shr. of publ.
in class containing
term		 Num. of
publ.
in class
1 RAMSAY HLTH 4 75% 0.3% 3
2 HLTH ACT SPORT EXERCISE 4 56% 0.4% 5
3 CIENCIAS SALUDGRP CLINIMETRIA AE 14 2 67% 0.2% 2
4 FED RECH HANDIC IFR 25 2 67% 0.2% 2
5 HOLLAND ORTHOPAED ARTHRIT HOSP 2 67% 0.2% 2
6 SERV PLANIFICACIO COORDINACIO ASISTENCIAL 2 67% 0.2% 2
7 BIOMECAN COMPORTAMENTO MOTOR 1 50% 0.2% 2
8 CNFS VOLET 1 100% 0.2% 2
9 HOSP LUCY MONTOURO 1 100% 0.2% 2
10 PROGRAM PHYSIOTHER Y SCI 1 100% 0.2% 2

Related classes at same level (level 1)


Rank Relatedness score Related classes
1 0.0000182003 PROMIS//ITEM BANK//MED SOCIAL SCI
2 0.0000148760 FEAR AVOIDANCE BELIEFS//LOW BACK PAIN//PAIN RELATED FEAR
3 0.0000132673 SF 12//SF 36 HEALTH SURVEY//PHYSICAL FUNCTIONAL HEALTH
4 0.0000130034 PAIN DRAWINGS//PAIN DRAWING//LUMBOPELVIC MOTION
5 0.0000113136 FUNCTIONAL CAPACITY EVALUATION//WORK CAPACITY EVALUATION//LIFT CAPACITY
6 0.0000112301 RESPONSE SHIFT//INDIVIDUAL QUALITY OF LIFE//PATIENT GENERATED INDEX
7 0.0000103817 BACK SCHOOL//FUNCTIONAL RESTORATION//CHIROPRACTIC
8 0.0000084839 EORTC QLQ C30//QUAL LIFE UNIT//FACT G
9 0.0000080622 LUMBAR SPINAL STENOSIS//SPINAL STENOSIS//NEUROGENIC CLAUDICATION
10 0.0000079803 ELECTRONIC DATA CAPTURE//PATIENT CENTRED ASSESSMENT//EPRO