Class information for: |
Basic class information |
Class id | #P | Avg. number of references |
Database coverage of references |
---|---|---|---|
1603 | 2572 | 65.5 | 22% |
Hierarchy of classes |
The table includes all classes above and classes immediately below the current class. |
Cluster id | Level | Cluster label | #P |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 4 | ECONOMICS//EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH//PSYCHOL | 3876184 |
106 | 3 | LAW//FORDHAM LAW REVIEW//BUSINESS LAWYER | 71924 |
398 | 2 | LAW//ADMINISTRATIVE LAW REVIEW//JUDICATURE | 16759 |
1603 | 1 | LAW//JOURNAL OF LEGAL STUDIES//CONTINGENT FEES | 2572 |
Terms with highest relevance score |
rank | Term | termType | Chi square | Shr. of publ. in class containing term |
Class's shr. of term's tot. occurrences |
#P with term in class |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | LAW | WoSSC | 622638 | 91% | 2% | 2350 |
2 | JOURNAL OF LEGAL STUDIES | journal | 171154 | 4% | 13% | 112 |
3 | CONTINGENT FEES | authKW | 87406 | 0% | 82% | 9 |
4 | CECIL D BRANSTETTER LITIGAT DISPUTE OLUT PRO | address | 84410 | 0% | 89% | 8 |
5 | UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA LAW REVIEW | journal | 81513 | 4% | 7% | 94 |
6 | CLASS ACTION | authKW | 71210 | 0% | 50% | 12 |
7 | JUDICATURE | journal | 68788 | 3% | 8% | 70 |
8 | INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF LAW AND ECONOMICS | journal | 67507 | 2% | 9% | 64 |
9 | NOTRE DAME LAW REVIEW | journal | 64568 | 3% | 7% | 78 |
10 | FEE SHIFTING | authKW | 59352 | 0% | 100% | 5 |
Web of Science journal categories |
Rank | Term | Chi square | Shr. of publ. in class containing term |
Class's shr. of term's tot. occurrences |
#P with term in class |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Law | 622638 | 91% | 2% | 2350 |
2 | Economics | 1910 | 10% | 0% | 261 |
3 | Industrial Relations & Labor | 570 | 1% | 0% | 34 |
4 | Social Sciences, Interdisciplinary | 107 | 1% | 0% | 34 |
5 | Political Science | 46 | 1% | 0% | 30 |
6 | International Relations | 39 | 1% | 0% | 18 |
7 | Social Issues | 33 | 0% | 0% | 12 |
8 | Urban Studies | 27 | 0% | 0% | 12 |
9 | Sociology | 26 | 1% | 0% | 24 |
10 | Business, Finance | 10 | 1% | 0% | 13 |
Address terms |
Rank | Term | Chi square | Shr. of publ. in class containing term |
Class's shr. of term's tot. occurrences |
#P with term in class |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | LAW | 144684 | 24% | 2% | 609 |
2 | CECIL D BRANSTETTER LITIGAT DISPUTE OLUT PRO | 84410 | 0% | 89% | 8 |
3 | PROPRIATE DISPUTE OLUT | 23741 | 0% | 100% | 2 |
4 | SU HSE | 23741 | 0% | 100% | 2 |
5 | LAWYERS CIVIL JUSTICE MEDIA | 17803 | 0% | 50% | 3 |
6 | SALTMAN CONFLICT OLUT | 15826 | 0% | 67% | 2 |
7 | ADVANCEMENT AMER LEGAL SYST | 11870 | 0% | 100% | 1 |
8 | AMER CONSTRUCT LAWYERS | 11870 | 0% | 100% | 1 |
9 | AMER FAMILY INSURANCE CHAIR | 11870 | 0% | 100% | 1 |
10 | BRIDGEUPV EHU | 11870 | 0% | 100% | 1 |
Journals |
Rank | Term | Chi square | Shr. of publ. in class containing term |
Class's shr. of term's tot. occurrences |
#P with term in class |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | JOURNAL OF LEGAL STUDIES | 171154 | 4% | 13% | 112 |
2 | UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA LAW REVIEW | 81513 | 4% | 7% | 94 |
3 | JUDICATURE | 68788 | 3% | 8% | 70 |
4 | INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF LAW AND ECONOMICS | 67507 | 2% | 9% | 64 |
5 | NOTRE DAME LAW REVIEW | 64568 | 3% | 7% | 78 |
6 | TEXAS LAW REVIEW | 48515 | 3% | 6% | 74 |
7 | LAW AND CONTEMPORARY PROBLEMS | 43228 | 2% | 8% | 45 |
8 | NEW YORK UNIVERSITY LAW REVIEW | 42332 | 3% | 5% | 67 |
9 | UCLA LAW REVIEW | 39418 | 2% | 6% | 60 |
10 | JOURNAL OF EMPIRICAL LEGAL STUDIES | 36516 | 1% | 11% | 29 |
Author Key Words |
Rank | Term | Chi square | Shr. of publ. in class containing term |
Class's shr. of term's tot. occurrences |
#P with term in class |
LCSH search | Wikipedia search |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | CONTINGENT FEES | 87406 | 0% | 82% | 9 | Search CONTINGENT+FEES | Search CONTINGENT+FEES |
2 | CLASS ACTION | 71210 | 0% | 50% | 12 | Search CLASS+ACTION | Search CLASS+ACTION |
3 | FEE SHIFTING | 59352 | 0% | 100% | 5 | Search FEE+SHIFTING | Search FEE+SHIFTING |
4 | AMERICAN RULE | 49458 | 0% | 83% | 5 | Search AMERICAN+RULE | Search AMERICAN+RULE |
5 | ENGLISH RULE | 49458 | 0% | 83% | 5 | Search ENGLISH+RULE | Search ENGLISH+RULE |
6 | GROUP LITIGATION | 35611 | 0% | 100% | 3 | Search GROUP+LITIGATION | Search GROUP+LITIGATION |
7 | PRETRIAL NEGOTIATION | 35611 | 0% | 100% | 3 | Search PRETRIAL+NEGOTIATION | Search PRETRIAL+NEGOTIATION |
8 | COLLECTIVE REDRESS | 26707 | 0% | 75% | 3 | Search COLLECTIVE+REDRESS | Search COLLECTIVE+REDRESS |
9 | AGGREGATE LITIGATION | 23741 | 0% | 100% | 2 | Search AGGREGATE+LITIGATION | Search AGGREGATE+LITIGATION |
10 | BRITISH RULE | 23741 | 0% | 100% | 2 | Search BRITISH+RULE | Search BRITISH+RULE |
Core articles |
The table includes core articles in the class. The following variables is taken into account for the relevance score of an article in a cluster c: (1) Number of references referring to publications in the class. (2) Share of total number of active references referring to publications in the class. (3) Age of the article. New articles get higher score than old articles. (4) Citation rate, normalized to year. |
Rank | Reference | # ref. in cl. |
Shr. of ref. in cl. |
Citations |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | MILLER, AR , (2013) SIMPLIFIED PLEADING, MEANINGFUL DAYS IN COURT, AND TRIALS ON THE MERITS: REFLECTIONS ON THE DEFORMATION OF FEDERAL PROCEDURE.NEW YORK UNIVERSITY LAW REVIEW. VOL. 88. ISSUE 1. P. 286 -372 | 79 | 86% | 28 |
2 | GLOVER, JM , (2012) THE FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL SETTLEMENT.NEW YORK UNIVERSITY LAW REVIEW. VOL. 87. ISSUE 6. P. 1713-1778 | 70 | 86% | 11 |
3 | CARRINGTON, PD , (2010) POLITICS AND CIVIL PROCEDURE RULEMAKING: REFLECTIONS ON EXPERIENCE.DUKE LAW JOURNAL. VOL. 60. ISSUE 3. P. 597 -667 | 62 | 83% | 10 |
4 | MILLER, AR , (2010) FROM CONLEY TO TWOMBLY TO IQBAL: A DOUBLE PLAY ON THE FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE.DUKE LAW JOURNAL. VOL. 60. ISSUE 1. P. 1-130 | 46 | 87% | 72 |
5 | GENSLER, SS , (2010) JUDICIAL CASE MANAGEMENT: CAUGHT IN THE CROSSFIRE.DUKE LAW JOURNAL. VOL. 60. ISSUE 3. P. 669 -744 | 43 | 100% | 19 |
6 | CLOPTONS, ZD , (2015) TRANSNATIONAL CLASS ACTIONS IN THE SHADOW OF PRECLUSION.INDIANA LAW JOURNAL. VOL. 90. ISSUE 4. P. 1387 -1428 | 52 | 73% | 2 |
7 | MILLER, GP , (2010) PRELIMINARY JUDGMENTS.UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS LAW REVIEW. VOL. . ISSUE 1. P. 165-204 | 50 | 78% | 7 |
8 | MAIN, TO , (2003) TRADITIONAL EQUITY AND CONTEMPORARY PROCEDURE.WASHINGTON LAW REVIEW. VOL. 78. ISSUE 2. P. 429-514 | 69 | 67% | 22 |
9 | WERNER, MS , (2015) THE VIABILITY AND STRATEGIC SIGNIFICANCE OF CLASS ACTION ALTERNATIVES UNDER CAFA'S MASS ACTION PROVISIONS.GEORGETOWN LAW JOURNAL. VOL. 103. ISSUE 2. P. 465 -496 | 36 | 97% | 0 |
10 | SUBRIN, SN , MAIN, TO , (2014) THE FOURTH ERA OF AMERICAN CIVIL PROCEDURE.UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA LAW REVIEW. VOL. 162. ISSUE 7. P. 1839 -1895 | 54 | 62% | 7 |
Classes with closest relation at Level 1 |