Class information for: |
Basic class information |
Class id | #P | Avg. number of references |
Database coverage of references |
---|---|---|---|
30580 | 166 | 29.4 | 16% |
Hierarchy of classes |
The table includes all classes above and classes immediately below the current class. |
Cluster id | Level | Cluster label | #P |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 4 | ECONOMICS//EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH//PSYCHOL | 3876184 |
106 | 3 | LAW//FORDHAM LAW REVIEW//BUSINESS LAWYER | 71924 |
2950 | 2 | SEXUAL HARASSMENT//EMPLOYEE RELATIONS LAW JOURNAL//LABOR LAW JOURNAL | 2678 |
30580 | 1 | EMPLOYEE RELATIONS LAW JOURNAL//ANTI WORD//HIDEN MARKOV MODEL HMM | 166 |
Terms with highest relevance score |
rank | Term | termType | Chi square | Shr. of publ. in class containing term |
Class's shr. of term's tot. occurrences |
#P with term in class |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | EMPLOYEE RELATIONS LAW JOURNAL | journal | 199981 | 11% | 6% | 19 |
2 | ANTI WORD | authKW | 183949 | 1% | 100% | 1 |
3 | HIDEN MARKOV MODEL HMM | authKW | 183949 | 1% | 100% | 1 |
4 | PERSONNEL DISPARATE TREATMENT | authKW | 183949 | 1% | 100% | 1 |
5 | SEGMENTAL PROBABILITY MODEL | authKW | 91973 | 1% | 50% | 1 |
6 | SPEECH VERIFICATION | authKW | 91973 | 1% | 50% | 1 |
7 | LAW | WoSSC | 30868 | 80% | 0% | 133 |
8 | LABOR LAW JOURNAL | journal | 27313 | 6% | 1% | 10 |
9 | UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS LAW FORUM | journal | 20437 | 1% | 11% | 1 |
10 | UNIVERSITY COMPUTING | journal | 20184 | 2% | 4% | 3 |
Web of Science journal categories |
Rank | Term | Chi square | Shr. of publ. in class containing term |
Class's shr. of term's tot. occurrences |
#P with term in class |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Law | 30868 | 80% | 0% | 133 |
2 | Industrial Relations & Labor | 10382 | 21% | 0% | 35 |
3 | Gerontology | 342 | 6% | 0% | 10 |
4 | Social Issues | 47 | 2% | 0% | 3 |
5 | Criminology & Penology | 45 | 2% | 0% | 3 |
6 | Education & Educational Research | 11 | 2% | 0% | 4 |
7 | Demography | 7 | 1% | 0% | 1 |
8 | Social Sciences, Interdisciplinary | 5 | 1% | 0% | 2 |
9 | Psychology, Social | 5 | 1% | 0% | 2 |
10 | Ergonomics | 5 | 1% | 0% | 1 |
Address terms |
Rank | Term | Chi square | Shr. of publ. in class containing term |
Class's shr. of term's tot. occurrences |
#P with term in class |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | PEPPER AGING PUBL POLICY | 15012 | 1% | 4% | 2 |
2 | LITIGAT | 11495 | 1% | 6% | 1 |
3 | CHICAGO KENT LAW | 3343 | 1% | 2% | 1 |
4 | MELBOURNE LAW | 1106 | 1% | 1% | 1 |
5 | BOALT HALL LAW | 1003 | 1% | 1% | 1 |
6 | COLUMBUS LAW | 774 | 1% | 0% | 1 |
7 | LAW | 285 | 4% | 0% | 7 |
8 | STATE INTELLIGENT TECHNOL SYST | 245 | 1% | 0% | 1 |
9 | GERONTOL | 24 | 1% | 0% | 1 |
10 | COMP SCI TECHNOL | 10 | 1% | 0% | 1 |
Journals |
Rank | Term | Chi square | Shr. of publ. in class containing term |
Class's shr. of term's tot. occurrences |
#P with term in class |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | EMPLOYEE RELATIONS LAW JOURNAL | 199981 | 11% | 6% | 19 |
2 | LABOR LAW JOURNAL | 27313 | 6% | 1% | 10 |
3 | UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS LAW FORUM | 20437 | 1% | 11% | 1 |
4 | UNIVERSITY COMPUTING | 20184 | 2% | 4% | 3 |
5 | HASTINGS LAW JOURNAL | 12805 | 5% | 1% | 9 |
6 | DISPUTE RESOLUTION JOURNAL | 7996 | 1% | 4% | 1 |
7 | WASHINGTON LAW REVIEW | 5198 | 3% | 1% | 5 |
8 | RUTGERS LAW REVIEW | 4485 | 2% | 1% | 4 |
9 | NOTRE DAME LAWYER | 4378 | 1% | 2% | 1 |
10 | COLUMBIA JOURNAL OF LAW AND SOCIAL PROBLEMS | 3926 | 2% | 1% | 3 |
Author Key Words |
Rank | Term | Chi square | Shr. of publ. in class containing term |
Class's shr. of term's tot. occurrences |
#P with term in class |
LCSH search | Wikipedia search |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | ANTI WORD | 183949 | 1% | 100% | 1 | Search ANTI+WORD | Search ANTI+WORD |
2 | HIDEN MARKOV MODEL HMM | 183949 | 1% | 100% | 1 | Search HIDEN+MARKOV+MODEL+HMM | Search HIDEN+MARKOV+MODEL+HMM |
3 | PERSONNEL DISPARATE TREATMENT | 183949 | 1% | 100% | 1 | Search PERSONNEL+DISPARATE+TREATMENT | Search PERSONNEL+DISPARATE+TREATMENT |
4 | SEGMENTAL PROBABILITY MODEL | 91973 | 1% | 50% | 1 | Search SEGMENTAL+PROBABILITY+MODEL | Search SEGMENTAL+PROBABILITY+MODEL |
5 | SPEECH VERIFICATION | 91973 | 1% | 50% | 1 | Search SPEECH+VERIFICATION | Search SPEECH+VERIFICATION |
6 | INDUSTRIAL PSYCHOLOGY | 7356 | 1% | 4% | 1 | Search INDUSTRIAL+PSYCHOLOGY | Search INDUSTRIAL+PSYCHOLOGY |
7 | STATISTICAL EVIDENCE | 3536 | 1% | 2% | 1 | Search STATISTICAL+EVIDENCE | Search STATISTICAL+EVIDENCE |
8 | AGE DISCRIMINATION | 1733 | 1% | 1% | 1 | Search AGE+DISCRIMINATION | Search AGE+DISCRIMINATION |
9 | MANPOWER PLANNING | 1127 | 1% | 1% | 1 | Search MANPOWER+PLANNING | Search MANPOWER+PLANNING |
10 | DOWNSIZING | 630 | 1% | 0% | 1 | Search DOWNSIZING | Search DOWNSIZING |
Core articles |
The table includes core articles in the class. The following variables is taken into account for the relevance score of an article in a cluster c: (1) Number of references referring to publications in the class. (2) Share of total number of active references referring to publications in the class. (3) Age of the article. New articles get higher score than old articles. (4) Citation rate, normalized to year. |
Rank | Reference | # ref. in cl. |
Shr. of ref. in cl. |
Citations |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | BITTER, AN , (2007) SMITH V. CITY OF JACKSON: SOLVING AN AGE-OLD PROBLEM?.CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY LAW REVIEW. VOL. 56. ISSUE 2. P. 647-682 | 6 | 100% | 0 |
2 | BESSEY, BL , ANANDA, SM , (1991) AGE-DISCRIMINATION IN EMPLOYMENT - AN INTERDISCIPLINARY REVIEW OF THE ADEA.RESEARCH ON AGING. VOL. 13. ISSUE 4. P. 413-457 | 12 | 71% | 9 |
3 | LUCE, GO , (2004) WHY DISPARATE IMPACT CLAIMS SHOULD NOT BE ALLOWED UNDER THE FEDERAL EMPLOYER PROVISIONS OF THE ADEA.NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY LAW REVIEW. VOL. 99. ISSUE 1. P. 437-494 | 7 | 70% | 1 |
4 | LEE, BA , (1995) LEGAL PITFALLS OF DOWNSIZING.HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT REVIEW. VOL. 5. ISSUE 1. P. 1-23 | 8 | 80% | 7 |
5 | IKUTA, B , (2008) WHY BINOMIAL DISTRIBUTIONS DO NOT WORK AS PROOF OF EMPLOYMENT DISCRIMINATION.HASTINGS LAW JOURNAL. VOL. 59. ISSUE 5. P. 1235-+ | 4 | 100% | 0 |
6 | PREHEIM, EJ , (1995) DISCRIMINATION, DECEIT, AND LEGAL DECOYS: THE DIVERSION OF AFTER-ACQUIRED EVIDENCE AND THE FOCUS RESTORED BY MCKENNON V NASHVILLE BANNER PUBLISHING COMPANY.INDIANA LAW JOURNAL. VOL. 71. ISSUE 1. P. 235-269 | 8 | 73% | 0 |
7 | BRECHTEL, K , (2000) KING V. PHELPS DUNBAR, LLP.: A CATCH-22 FOR LOUISIANA LAW FIRMS.LOUISIANA LAW REVIEW. VOL. 60. ISSUE 3. P. 929-945 | 4 | 100% | 0 |
8 | QUERRY, TJ , (1996) A ROSE BY ANY OTHER NAME NO LONGER SMELLS AS SWEET: DISPARATE TREATMENT DISCRIMINATION AND THE AGE PROXY DOCTRINE AFTER HAZEN PAPER CO V BIGGINS.CORNELL LAW REVIEW. VOL. 81. ISSUE 2. P. 530-581 | 8 | 53% | 3 |
9 | ANDERSON, JM , (1997) EMPLOYMENT LAW.DENVER UNIVERSITY LAW REVIEW. VOL. 74. ISSUE 2. P. 455-471 | 6 | 67% | 1 |
10 | LIN, AC , (1996) APPLICATION OF THE CONTINUING VIOLATIONS DOCTRINE TO ENVIRONMENTAL LAW.ECOLOGY LAW QUARTERLY. VOL. 23. ISSUE 4. P. 723-777 | 6 | 67% | 4 |
Classes with closest relation at Level 1 |