Class information for: |
Basic class information |
| Class id | #P | Avg. number of references |
Database coverage of references |
|---|---|---|---|
| 36503 | 80 | 52.4 | 14% |
Hierarchy of classes |
The table includes all classes above and classes immediately below the current class. |
| Cluster id | Level | Cluster label | #P |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4 | ECONOMICS//EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH//PSYCHOL | 3876184 |
| 106 | 3 | LAW//FORDHAM LAW REVIEW//BUSINESS LAWYER | 71924 |
| 2143 | 2 | LAW//SOUTH AFRICAN JOURNAL ON HUMAN RIGHTS//HARVARD CIVIL RIGHTS-CIVIL LIBERTIES LAW REVIEW | 5038 |
| 36503 | 1 | TELEOLOGICAL ARGUMENTATION//PRAGMATIC ARGUMENTATION//A CONTRARIO ARGUMENT | 80 |
Terms with highest relevance score |
| rank | Term | termType | Chi square | Shr. of publ. in class containing term |
Class's shr. of term's tot. occurrences |
#P with term in class |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | TELEOLOGICAL ARGUMENTATION | authKW | 763392 | 3% | 100% | 2 |
| 2 | PRAGMATIC ARGUMENTATION | authKW | 429404 | 4% | 38% | 3 |
| 3 | A CONTRARIO ARGUMENT | authKW | 381696 | 1% | 100% | 1 |
| 4 | ANALYSIS OF ARGUMENTATION | authKW | 381696 | 1% | 100% | 1 |
| 5 | APPEAL TO DIFFERENCES | authKW | 381696 | 1% | 100% | 1 |
| 6 | ARGUMENTATION IN LAW | authKW | 381696 | 1% | 100% | 1 |
| 7 | CRITICAL QUESTION | authKW | 381696 | 1% | 100% | 1 |
| 8 | ETHICAL ENTROPY | authKW | 381696 | 1% | 100% | 1 |
| 9 | EVALUATION OF ARGUMENTATION | authKW | 381696 | 1% | 100% | 1 |
| 10 | EXCHANGE OF REASONS | authKW | 381696 | 1% | 100% | 1 |
Web of Science journal categories |
| Rank | Term | Chi square | Shr. of publ. in class containing term |
Class's shr. of term's tot. occurrences |
#P with term in class |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Law | 11752 | 71% | 0% | 57 |
| 2 | Philosophy | 493 | 13% | 0% | 10 |
| 3 | Language & Linguistics | 212 | 8% | 0% | 6 |
| 4 | Communication | 121 | 5% | 0% | 4 |
| 5 | Linguistics | 78 | 5% | 0% | 4 |
| 6 | Political Science | 77 | 6% | 0% | 5 |
| 7 | Humanities, Multidisciplinary | 34 | 3% | 0% | 2 |
| 8 | Asian Studies | 24 | 1% | 0% | 1 |
| 9 | Information Science & Library Science | 17 | 3% | 0% | 2 |
| 10 | Social Issues | 10 | 1% | 0% | 1 |
Address terms |
| Rank | Term | Chi square | Shr. of publ. in class containing term |
Class's shr. of term's tot. occurrences |
#P with term in class |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | IDC COMPARAT LAW | 381696 | 1% | 100% | 1 |
| 2 | LEGAL STUDIES ANGELO SRAFFA | 381696 | 1% | 100% | 1 |
| 3 | SPEECH COMMUN ARGUMENTAT THEORY RHETOR | 339279 | 5% | 22% | 4 |
| 4 | BALLIOL | 5611 | 1% | 1% | 1 |
| 5 | HADASSAH MED ORG | 5530 | 1% | 1% | 1 |
| 6 | GOULD LAW | 1650 | 1% | 0% | 1 |
| 7 | COLUMBUS LAW | 1609 | 1% | 0% | 1 |
| 8 | HANKAMER BUSINESS | 1406 | 1% | 0% | 1 |
| 9 | LAW | 1245 | 13% | 0% | 10 |
| 10 | BUSINESS ECON | 45 | 1% | 0% | 1 |
Journals |
| Rank | Term | Chi square | Shr. of publ. in class containing term |
Class's shr. of term's tot. occurrences |
#P with term in class |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ABA JOURNAL | 65116 | 13% | 2% | 10 |
| 2 | INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR THE SEMIOTICS OF LAW-REVUE INTERNATIONALE DE SEMIOTIQUE JURIDIQUE | 29933 | 3% | 4% | 2 |
| 3 | ARGUMENTATION | 29495 | 5% | 2% | 4 |
| 4 | INFORMAL LOGIC | 26419 | 4% | 2% | 3 |
| 5 | REVUE ROUMAINE DE PHILOSOPHIE | 8673 | 1% | 2% | 1 |
| 6 | HARVARD LAW REVIEW | 7297 | 6% | 0% | 5 |
| 7 | YALE LAW JOURNAL | 5924 | 6% | 0% | 5 |
| 8 | CANADIAN BAR REVIEW-REVUE DU BARREAU CANADIEN | 4955 | 1% | 1% | 1 |
| 9 | AMERICAN JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE LAW | 4133 | 4% | 0% | 3 |
| 10 | BOSTON UNIVERSITY LAW REVIEW | 2862 | 4% | 0% | 3 |
Author Key Words |
| Rank | Term | Chi square | Shr. of publ. in class containing term |
Class's shr. of term's tot. occurrences |
#P with term in class |
LCSH search | Wikipedia search |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | TELEOLOGICAL ARGUMENTATION | 763392 | 3% | 100% | 2 | Search TELEOLOGICAL+ARGUMENTATION | Search TELEOLOGICAL+ARGUMENTATION |
| 2 | PRAGMATIC ARGUMENTATION | 429404 | 4% | 38% | 3 | Search PRAGMATIC+ARGUMENTATION | Search PRAGMATIC+ARGUMENTATION |
| 3 | A CONTRARIO ARGUMENT | 381696 | 1% | 100% | 1 | Search A+CONTRARIO+ARGUMENT | Search A+CONTRARIO+ARGUMENT |
| 4 | ANALYSIS OF ARGUMENTATION | 381696 | 1% | 100% | 1 | Search ANALYSIS+OF+ARGUMENTATION | Search ANALYSIS+OF+ARGUMENTATION |
| 5 | APPEAL TO DIFFERENCES | 381696 | 1% | 100% | 1 | Search APPEAL+TO+DIFFERENCES | Search APPEAL+TO+DIFFERENCES |
| 6 | ARGUMENTATION IN LAW | 381696 | 1% | 100% | 1 | Search ARGUMENTATION+IN+LAW | Search ARGUMENTATION+IN+LAW |
| 7 | CRITICAL QUESTION | 381696 | 1% | 100% | 1 | Search CRITICAL+QUESTION | Search CRITICAL+QUESTION |
| 8 | ETHICAL ENTROPY | 381696 | 1% | 100% | 1 | Search ETHICAL+ENTROPY | Search ETHICAL+ENTROPY |
| 9 | EVALUATION OF ARGUMENTATION | 381696 | 1% | 100% | 1 | Search EVALUATION+OF+ARGUMENTATION | Search EVALUATION+OF+ARGUMENTATION |
| 10 | EXCHANGE OF REASONS | 381696 | 1% | 100% | 1 | Search EXCHANGE+OF+REASONS | Search EXCHANGE+OF+REASONS |
Core articles |
The table includes core articles in the class. The following variables is taken into account for the relevance score of an article in a cluster c: (1) Number of references referring to publications in the class. (2) Share of total number of active references referring to publications in the class. (3) Age of the article. New articles get higher score than old articles. (4) Citation rate, normalized to year. |
| Rank | Reference | # ref. in cl. |
Shr. of ref. in cl. |
Citations |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | PETERS, CJ , (2000) OUTCOMES, REASONS, AND EQUALITY.BOSTON UNIVERSITY LAW REVIEW. VOL. 80. ISSUE 4. P. 1095-1126 | 7 | 100% | 1 |
| 2 | PETERS, CJ , (1999) SLOUCHING TOWARDS EQUALITY.IOWA LAW REVIEW. VOL. 84. ISSUE 4. P. 801-818 | 7 | 100% | 3 |
| 3 | PETERS, CJ , (1997) EQUALITY REVISITED.HARVARD LAW REVIEW. VOL. 110. ISSUE 6. P. 1211-1264 | 8 | 80% | 1 |
| 4 | SIMONS, KW , (2000) THE LOGIC OF EGALITARIAN NORMS.BOSTON UNIVERSITY LAW REVIEW. VOL. 80. ISSUE 3. P. 693 -771 | 14 | 40% | 12 |
| 5 | FETERIS, ET , (2016) PROTOTYPICAL ARGUMENTATIVE PATTERNS IN A LEGAL CONTEXT: THE ROLE OF PRAGMATIC ARGUMENTATION IN THE JUSTIFICATION OF JUDICIAL DECISIONS.ARGUMENTATION. VOL. 30. ISSUE 1. P. 61 -79 | 3 | 100% | 0 |
| 6 | SCUTARI, M , (2009) "THE GREAT EQUALIZER": MAKING SENSE OF THE SUPREME COURT'S EQUAL PROTECTION JURISPRUDENCE IN AMERICAN PUBLIC EDUCATION AND BEYOND.GEORGETOWN LAW JOURNAL. VOL. 97. ISSUE 3. P. 917-943 | 6 | 50% | 1 |
| 7 | HOWE, SW , (2001) THE TROUBLING INFLUENCE OF EQUALITY IN CONSTITUTIONAL CRIMINAL PROCEDURE: FROM BROWN TO MIRANDA, FURMAN AND BEYOND.VANDERBILT LAW REVIEW. VOL. 54. ISSUE 2. P. 359-450 | 11 | 26% | 10 |
| 8 | LAMOND, G , (2014) ANALOGICAL REASONING IN THE COMMON LAW.OXFORD JOURNAL OF LEGAL STUDIES. VOL. 34. ISSUE 3. P. 567 -588 | 2 | 100% | 2 |
| 9 | BRUBAKER, SC , (1988) CAN LIBERALS PUNISH.AMERICAN POLITICAL SCIENCE REVIEW. VOL. 82. ISSUE 3. P. 821-836 | 7 | 70% | 5 |
| 10 | HARTNETT, MM , (2014) JUDICIAL SPECULATION ON CONSUMER IMPRESSION: THE PITFALLS OF MEASURING TRADEMARK TACKING AS A QUESTION OF LAW.CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY LAW REVIEW. VOL. 63. ISSUE 4. P. 1021 -1047 | 2 | 100% | 0 |
Classes with closest relation at Level 1 |