Class information for: |
Basic class information |
| Class id | #P | Avg. number of references |
Database coverage of references |
|---|---|---|---|
| 620 | 3241 | 85.6 | 20% |
Hierarchy of classes |
The table includes all classes above and classes immediately below the current class. |
| Cluster id | Level | Cluster label | #P |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4 | ECONOMICS//EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH//PSYCHOL | 3876184 |
| 106 | 3 | LAW//FORDHAM LAW REVIEW//BUSINESS LAWYER | 71924 |
| 398 | 2 | LAW//ADMINISTRATIVE LAW REVIEW//JUDICATURE | 16759 |
| 620 | 1 | ADMINISTRATIVE LAW REVIEW//LAW//GEORGE WASHINGTON LAW REVIEW | 3241 |
Terms with highest relevance score |
| rank | Term | termType | Chi square | Shr. of publ. in class containing term |
Class's shr. of term's tot. occurrences |
#P with term in class |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ADMINISTRATIVE LAW REVIEW | journal | 1810718 | 12% | 50% | 381 |
| 2 | LAW | WoSSC | 813439 | 93% | 3% | 3015 |
| 3 | GEORGE WASHINGTON LAW REVIEW | journal | 192992 | 5% | 13% | 155 |
| 4 | DUKE LAW JOURNAL | journal | 188302 | 5% | 13% | 150 |
| 5 | HARVARD ENVIRONMENTAL LAW REVIEW | journal | 131804 | 2% | 19% | 74 |
| 6 | ECOLOGY LAW QUARTERLY | journal | 104794 | 3% | 12% | 90 |
| 7 | HARVARD LAW REVIEW | journal | 96842 | 4% | 9% | 116 |
| 8 | COLUMBIA LAW REVIEW | journal | 79849 | 4% | 7% | 115 |
| 9 | GEORGETOWN LAW JOURNAL | journal | 70331 | 3% | 8% | 98 |
| 10 | YALE LAW JOURNAL | journal | 68127 | 3% | 7% | 108 |
Web of Science journal categories |
| Rank | Term | Chi square | Shr. of publ. in class containing term |
Class's shr. of term's tot. occurrences |
#P with term in class |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Law | 813439 | 93% | 3% | 3015 |
| 2 | Environmental Studies | 3030 | 6% | 0% | 186 |
| 3 | Public Administration | 1277 | 2% | 0% | 72 |
| 4 | Political Science | 216 | 2% | 0% | 62 |
| 5 | Social Issues | 129 | 1% | 0% | 24 |
| 6 | Industrial Relations & Labor | 26 | 0% | 0% | 10 |
| 7 | International Relations | 21 | 1% | 0% | 17 |
| 8 | Ethics | 12 | 0% | 0% | 10 |
| 9 | Economics | 9 | 2% | 0% | 54 |
| 10 | Criminology & Penology | 4 | 0% | 0% | 7 |
Address terms |
| Rank | Term | Chi square | Shr. of publ. in class containing term |
Class's shr. of term's tot. occurrences |
#P with term in class |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | LAW | 338176 | 32% | 3% | 1044 |
| 2 | WALTER F GEORGE LAW | 25117 | 0% | 67% | 4 |
| 3 | WASHINGTON LAW | 23344 | 1% | 10% | 24 |
| 4 | ENVIRONM LAW PROGRAM | 19619 | 0% | 42% | 5 |
| 5 | STANFORD INT SECUR COOPERAT | 18839 | 0% | 100% | 2 |
| 6 | W JAMES KRONZER CHAIR TRIAL PELLATE ADVOCACY | 18839 | 0% | 100% | 2 |
| 7 | BLOUSTEIN PLANNING POLICY | 16953 | 0% | 60% | 3 |
| 8 | REGULATORY POLICY PROGRAM | 15067 | 0% | 40% | 4 |
| 9 | LAW BOALT HALL | 12558 | 0% | 67% | 2 |
| 10 | PUBL INTE T LAW | 12558 | 0% | 67% | 2 |
Journals |
| Rank | Term | Chi square | Shr. of publ. in class containing term |
Class's shr. of term's tot. occurrences |
#P with term in class |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ADMINISTRATIVE LAW REVIEW | 1810718 | 12% | 50% | 381 |
| 2 | GEORGE WASHINGTON LAW REVIEW | 192992 | 5% | 13% | 155 |
| 3 | DUKE LAW JOURNAL | 188302 | 5% | 13% | 150 |
| 4 | HARVARD ENVIRONMENTAL LAW REVIEW | 131804 | 2% | 19% | 74 |
| 5 | ECOLOGY LAW QUARTERLY | 104794 | 3% | 12% | 90 |
| 6 | HARVARD LAW REVIEW | 96842 | 4% | 9% | 116 |
| 7 | COLUMBIA LAW REVIEW | 79849 | 4% | 7% | 115 |
| 8 | GEORGETOWN LAW JOURNAL | 70331 | 3% | 8% | 98 |
| 9 | YALE LAW JOURNAL | 68127 | 3% | 7% | 108 |
| 10 | UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO LAW REVIEW | 62633 | 3% | 7% | 97 |
Author Key Words |
| Rank | Term | Chi square | Shr. of publ. in class containing term |
Class's shr. of term's tot. occurrences |
#P with term in class |
LCSH search | Wikipedia search |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | RULEMAKING | 23176 | 0% | 31% | 8 | Search RULEMAKING | Search RULEMAKING |
| 2 | OIRA | 21193 | 0% | 75% | 3 | Search OIRA | Search OIRA |
| 3 | PUBLIC COMMENT | 18839 | 0% | 100% | 2 | Search PUBLIC+COMMENT | Search PUBLIC+COMMENT |
| 4 | FEDERAL REGISTER | 12558 | 0% | 67% | 2 | Search FEDERAL+REGISTER | Search FEDERAL+REGISTER |
| 5 | CAPITALIST PLANNING | 9420 | 0% | 100% | 1 | Search CAPITALIST+PLANNING | Search CAPITALIST+PLANNING |
| 6 | CHIEF COUNSEL | 9420 | 0% | 100% | 1 | Search CHIEF+COUNSEL | Search CHIEF+COUNSEL |
| 7 | CINDERELLA CONSTRAINT | 9420 | 0% | 100% | 1 | Search CINDERELLA+CONSTRAINT | Search CINDERELLA+CONSTRAINT |
| 8 | CONGRESSIONAL EARMARKING | 9420 | 0% | 100% | 1 | Search CONGRESSIONAL+EARMARKING | Search CONGRESSIONAL+EARMARKING |
| 9 | CONSTITUTIONAL REDESIGN | 9420 | 0% | 100% | 1 | Search CONSTITUTIONAL+REDESIGN | Search CONSTITUTIONAL+REDESIGN |
| 10 | CONTROL OF INTERNET GOVERNANCE | 9420 | 0% | 100% | 1 | Search CONTROL+OF+INTERNET+GOVERNANCE | Search CONTROL+OF+INTERNET+GOVERNANCE |
Core articles |
The table includes core articles in the class. The following variables is taken into account for the relevance score of an article in a cluster c: (1) Number of references referring to publications in the class. (2) Share of total number of active references referring to publications in the class. (3) Age of the article. New articles get higher score than old articles. (4) Citation rate, normalized to year. |
| Rank | Reference | # ref. in cl. |
Shr. of ref. in cl. |
Citations |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | GLUCK, AR , BRESSMAN, LS , (2013) STATUTORY INTERPRETATION FROM THE INSIDE-AN EMPIRICAL STUDY OF CONGRESSIONAL DRAFTING, DELEGATION, AND THE CANONS: PART I.STANFORD LAW REVIEW. VOL. 65. ISSUE 5. P. 901 -1025 | 66 | 92% | 63 |
| 2 | SHARKEY, CM , (2014) STATE FARM "WITH TEETH": HEIGHTENED JUDICIAL REVIEW IN THE ABSENCE OF EXECUTIVE OVERSIGHT.NEW YORK UNIVERSITY LAW REVIEW. VOL. 89. ISSUE 5. P. 1589 -1660 | 69 | 97% | 7 |
| 3 | ANDRIAS, K , (2013) THE PRESIDENT'S ENFORCEMENT POWER.NEW YORK UNIVERSITY LAW REVIEW. VOL. 88. ISSUE 4. P. 1031 -1125 | 74 | 81% | 30 |
| 4 | BARNETT, K , (2015) CODIFYING CHEVMORE.NEW YORK UNIVERSITY LAW REVIEW. VOL. 90. ISSUE 1. P. 1 -70 | 63 | 97% | 4 |
| 5 | MARISAM, J , (2013) THE PRESIDENT'S AGENCY SELECTION POWERS.ADMINISTRATIVE LAW REVIEW. VOL. 65. ISSUE 4. P. 821 -880 | 65 | 96% | 6 |
| 6 | KALEN, S , (2016) THE DEATH OF ADMINISTRATIVE COMMON LAW OR THE RISE OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE ACT.RUTGERS UNIVERSITY LAW REVIEW. VOL. 68. ISSUE 2. P. 605 -681 | 70 | 85% | 0 |
| 7 | WALKER, CJ , (2015) INSIDE AGENCY STATUTORY INTERPRETATION.STANFORD LAW REVIEW. VOL. 67. ISSUE 5. P. 999 -1079 | 57 | 88% | 11 |
| 8 | ESKRIDGE, WN , BAER, LE , (2008) THE CONTINUUM OF DEFERENCE: SUPREME COURT TREATMENT OF AGENCY STATUTORY INTERPRETATIONS FROM CHEVRON TO HAMDAN.GEORGETOWN LAW JOURNAL. VOL. 96. ISSUE 4. P. 1083-1226 | 61 | 85% | 156 |
| 9 | MICHAELS, JD , (2015) AN ENDURING, EVOLVING SEPARATION OF POWERS.COLUMBIA LAW REVIEW. VOL. 115. ISSUE 3. P. 515 -598 | 72 | 65% | 12 |
| 10 | STASZEWSKI, G , (2015) THE DUMBING DOWN OF STATUTORY INTERPRETATION.BOSTON UNIVERSITY LAW REVIEW. VOL. 95. ISSUE 1. P. 209 -278 | 65 | 84% | 2 |
Classes with closest relation at Level 1 |