Class information for: |
Basic class information |
Class id | #P | Avg. number of references |
Database coverage of references |
---|---|---|---|
3010 | 2534 | 56.2 | 14% |
Hierarchy of classes |
The table includes all classes above and classes immediately below the current class. |
Cluster id | Level | Cluster label | #P |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 4 | ECONOMICS//EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH//PSYCHOL | 3876184 |
106 | 3 | LAW//FORDHAM LAW REVIEW//BUSINESS LAWYER | 71924 |
3010 | 2 | LAW//HARVARD CIVIL RIGHTS-CIVIL LIBERTIES LAW REVIEW//NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY LAW REVIEW | 2534 |
4724 | 1 | LAW//HARVARD CIVIL RIGHTS-CIVIL LIBERTIES LAW REVIEW//UCLA LAW REVIEW | 1737 |
25916 | 1 | FAIR COMMENT//DEFAMATION//QUALIFIED PRIVILEGE | 268 |
27912 | 1 | ACADEMIC FREEDOM//ACADEMIC CORRUPTION//ADM LAW COURSE | 218 |
33064 | 1 | CONCESSION SPEECHES//ABSTRACT EQUALITY//AEON FLUX | 130 |
35819 | 1 | MANITOBA PALLIATIVE CARE UNIT//AHP BABY K//COUNCIL CANADIANS DISABIL | 91 |
35854 | 1 | ARCHAEOL ETHNOG PROGRAM//ETHNOGRAPHIC PROGRAM EVALUATION//FEDERAL RESOURCE MANAGEMENT | 90 |
Terms with highest relevance score |
rank | Term | termType | Chi square | Shr. of publ. in class containing term |
Class's shr. of term's tot. occurrences |
#P with term in class |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | LAW | WoSSC | 422088 | 76% | 2% | 1922 |
2 | HARVARD CIVIL RIGHTS-CIVIL LIBERTIES LAW REVIEW | journal | 47321 | 2% | 9% | 43 |
3 | NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY LAW REVIEW | journal | 42227 | 3% | 5% | 65 |
4 | UCLA LAW REVIEW | journal | 38687 | 2% | 5% | 59 |
5 | DUKE LAW JOURNAL | journal | 35950 | 2% | 5% | 58 |
6 | TEXAS LAW REVIEW | journal | 32351 | 2% | 4% | 60 |
7 | JOURNAL OF LAW & EDUCATION | journal | 31827 | 1% | 12% | 22 |
8 | ACADEMIC FREEDOM | authKW | 31341 | 1% | 15% | 17 |
9 | COLUMBIA LAW REVIEW | journal | 30612 | 2% | 4% | 63 |
10 | HARVARD LAW REVIEW | journal | 27802 | 2% | 4% | 55 |
Web of Science journal categories |
Rank | Term | Chi square | Shr. of publ. in class containing term |
Class's shr. of term's tot. occurrences |
#P with term in class |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Law | 422088 | 76% | 2% | 1922 |
2 | Communication | 2158 | 4% | 0% | 96 |
3 | Ethics | 975 | 2% | 0% | 55 |
4 | Cultural Studies | 709 | 1% | 0% | 30 |
5 | Social Issues | 570 | 2% | 0% | 41 |
6 | Education & Educational Research | 473 | 4% | 0% | 93 |
7 | Philosophy | 220 | 2% | 0% | 43 |
8 | Humanities, Multidisciplinary | 210 | 1% | 0% | 30 |
9 | Industrial Relations & Labor | 206 | 1% | 0% | 21 |
10 | Business | 186 | 2% | 0% | 48 |
Address terms |
Rank | Term | Chi square | Shr. of publ. in class containing term |
Class's shr. of term's tot. occurrences |
#P with term in class |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | LAW | 69930 | 17% | 1% | 421 |
2 | MANITOBA PALLIATIVE CARE UNIT | 24097 | 0% | 100% | 2 |
3 | COLUMBUS LAW | 20298 | 1% | 8% | 20 |
4 | ADM LAW COURSE | 12048 | 0% | 100% | 1 |
5 | ARCHAEOL ETHNOG PROGRAM | 12048 | 0% | 100% | 1 |
6 | ATSIS UNIT | 12048 | 0% | 100% | 1 |
7 | C ITAL PUBL LAW POLICY | 12048 | 0% | 100% | 1 |
8 | CLAUDE W PETIT LAW | 12048 | 0% | 100% | 1 |
9 | CMCL MEDIA COMMUN LAW | 12048 | 0% | 100% | 1 |
10 | COUNCIL CANADIANS DISABIL | 12048 | 0% | 100% | 1 |
Journals |
Rank | Term | Chi square | Shr. of publ. in class containing term |
Class's shr. of term's tot. occurrences |
#P with term in class |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | HARVARD CIVIL RIGHTS-CIVIL LIBERTIES LAW REVIEW | 47321 | 2% | 9% | 43 |
2 | NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY LAW REVIEW | 42227 | 3% | 5% | 65 |
3 | UCLA LAW REVIEW | 38687 | 2% | 5% | 59 |
4 | DUKE LAW JOURNAL | 35950 | 2% | 5% | 58 |
5 | TEXAS LAW REVIEW | 32351 | 2% | 4% | 60 |
6 | JOURNAL OF LAW & EDUCATION | 31827 | 1% | 12% | 22 |
7 | COLUMBIA LAW REVIEW | 30612 | 2% | 4% | 63 |
8 | HARVARD LAW REVIEW | 27802 | 2% | 4% | 55 |
9 | MINNESOTA LAW REVIEW | 26759 | 2% | 4% | 53 |
10 | CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY LAW REVIEW | 26262 | 2% | 5% | 45 |
Author Key Words |
Rank | Term | Chi square | Shr. of publ. in class containing term |
Class's shr. of term's tot. occurrences |
#P with term in class |
LCSH search | Wikipedia search |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | ACADEMIC FREEDOM | 31341 | 1% | 15% | 17 | Search ACADEMIC+FREEDOM | Search ACADEMIC+FREEDOM |
2 | CONCESSION SPEECHES | 24097 | 0% | 100% | 2 | Search CONCESSION+SPEECHES | Search CONCESSION+SPEECHES |
3 | FAIR COMMENT | 24097 | 0% | 100% | 2 | Search FAIR+COMMENT | Search FAIR+COMMENT |
4 | DEFAMATION | 21855 | 0% | 26% | 7 | Search DEFAMATION | Search DEFAMATION |
5 | QUALIFIED PRIVILEGE | 16063 | 0% | 67% | 2 | Search QUALIFIED+PRIVILEGE | Search QUALIFIED+PRIVILEGE |
6 | FREEDOM OF SPEECH | 15725 | 0% | 15% | 9 | Search FREEDOM+OF+SPEECH | Search FREEDOM+OF+SPEECH |
7 | 1ST AMENDMENT | 12048 | 0% | 100% | 1 | Search 1ST+AMENDMENT | Search 1ST+AMENDMENT |
8 | ABSTRACT EQUALITY | 12048 | 0% | 100% | 1 | Search ABSTRACT+EQUALITY | Search ABSTRACT+EQUALITY |
9 | ACADEMIC CORRUPTION | 12048 | 0% | 100% | 1 | Search ACADEMIC+CORRUPTION | Search ACADEMIC+CORRUPTION |
10 | AEON FLUX | 12048 | 0% | 100% | 1 | Search AEON+FLUX | Search AEON+FLUX |
Core articles |
The table includes core articles in the class. The following variables is taken into account for the relevance score of an article in a cluster c: (1) Number of references referring to publications in the class. (2) Share of total number of active references referring to publications in the class. (3) Age of the article. New articles get higher score than old articles. (4) Citation rate, normalized to year. |
Rank | Reference | # ref. in cl. |
Shr. of ref. in cl. |
Citations |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | ROSENTHAL, L , (2008) THE EMERGING FIRST AMENDMENT LAW OF MANAGERIAL PREROGATIVE.FORDHAM LAW REVIEW. VOL. 77. ISSUE 1. P. 33-112 | 66 | 90% | 11 |
2 | BERMAN, MN , (2002) COMMERCIAL SPEECH AND THE UNCONSTITUTIONAL CONDITIONS DOCTRINE: A SECOND LOOK AT "THE GREATER INCLUDES THE LESSER".VANDERBILT LAW REVIEW. VOL. 55. ISSUE 3. P. 693 -796 | 42 | 82% | 12 |
3 | FREEDMAN, EM , (1996) A LOT MORE COMES INTO FOCUS WHEN YOU REMOVE THE LENS CAP: WHY PROLIFERATING NEW COMMUNICATIONS TECHNOLOGIES MAKE IT PARTICULARLY URGENT FOR THE SUPREME COURT TO ABANDON ITS INSIDE-OUT APPROACH TO FREEDOM OF SPEECH AND BRING OBSCENITY, FIGHTING WORDS, AND GROUP LIBEL WITHIN THE FIRST AMENDMENT.IOWA LAW REVIEW. VOL. 81. ISSUE 4. P. 883 -968 | 70 | 61% | 9 |
4 | ARDITO, A , (2013) SOCIAL MEDIA, ADMINISTRATIVE AGENCIES, AND THE FIRST AMENDMENT.ADMINISTRATIVE LAW REVIEW. VOL. 65. ISSUE 2. P. 301-386 | 28 | 85% | 1 |
5 | STERN, N , (2011) THE SUBORDINATE STATUS OF NEGATIVE SPEECH RIGHTS.BUFFALO LAW REVIEW. VOL. 59. ISSUE 4. P. 847-936 | 32 | 76% | 3 |
6 | CAMPBELL, WJ , (2016) SPEECH-FACILITATING CONDUCT.STANFORD LAW REVIEW. VOL. 68. ISSUE 1. P. 1 -65 | 31 | 60% | 2 |
7 | CHEN, J , (2005) CONDUIT-BASED REGULATION OF SPEECH.DUKE LAW JOURNAL. VOL. 54. ISSUE 6. P. 1359-1456 | 51 | 54% | 4 |
8 | YOO, CS , (2003) THE RISE AND DEMISE OF THE TECHNOLOGY-SPECIFIC APPROACH TO THE FIRST AMENDMENT.GEORGETOWN LAW JOURNAL. VOL. 91. ISSUE 2. P. 245-356 | 42 | 68% | 17 |
9 | SCHAUER, F , (1998) PRINCIPLES, INSTITUTIONS, AND THE FIRST AMENDMENT.HARVARD LAW REVIEW. VOL. 112. ISSUE 1. P. 84 -120 | 40 | 77% | 65 |
10 | LIDSKY, L , (2011) PUBLIC FORUM 2.0.BOSTON UNIVERSITY LAW REVIEW. VOL. 91. ISSUE 6. P. 1975-2028 | 25 | 81% | 5 |
Classes with closest relation at Level 2 |