{"id":406,"date":"2024-09-07T10:56:45","date_gmt":"2024-09-07T08:56:45","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.kth.se\/blogs\/emd\/?p=406"},"modified":"2024-09-11T12:59:44","modified_gmt":"2024-09-11T10:59:44","slug":"working-hard-or-working-smart","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.kth.se\/blogs\/emd\/2024\/09\/working-hard-or-working-smart\/","title":{"rendered":"Working hard, or working smart?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone size-medium wp-image-407\" src=\"https:\/\/www.kth.se\/blogs\/emd\/files\/2024\/05\/Monkey-369x369.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"369\" height=\"369\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.kth.se\/blogs\/emd\/files\/2024\/05\/Monkey-369x369.png 369w, https:\/\/www.kth.se\/blogs\/emd\/files\/2024\/05\/Monkey-1168x1168.png 1168w, https:\/\/www.kth.se\/blogs\/emd\/files\/2024\/05\/Monkey-150x150.png 150w, https:\/\/www.kth.se\/blogs\/emd\/files\/2024\/05\/Monkey-768x768.png 768w, https:\/\/www.kth.se\/blogs\/emd\/files\/2024\/05\/Monkey.png 1200w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 369px) 85vw, 369px\" \/><\/p>\n<p>A big misconception in the academic world is that working hard and working smart are the same. Well, they are not.<\/p>\n<p>You could also entitle this post &#8220;Save yourself before it is too late.&#8221; It is a message to those falling into the spiral of death in academia.<\/p>\n<p>We need to go back in time: it is the winter 2008-2009, and I am a doctoral student at the University of Padova, temporarily dispatched to ABB Corporate Research in V\u00e4ster\u00e5s, Sweden, for five months. This is the same place where I got my first employment in 2010 and where I stayed for eight years of my professional life.<\/p>\n<p>During that period, ABB advertised a researcher position in the team. Many candidates came to V\u00e4ster\u00e5s for the interview. In one case, the team manager asked me to join the candidate&#8217;s technical presentation and then asked me to talk privately to this person to understand him more from a personality standpoint. I was culturally closer to this person than the manager, so he relied on that to know more about the candidate.<\/p>\n<p>The manager and I discussed my conversation with the candidate afterward. He asked me what I thought of the candidate. I said, &#8220;Well, he knows his technical part and is a hard-working guy.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>The manager looked at me and said, &#8220;I do not want hard workers; I want smart workers. I want someone who does the job excellently and then leaves the premises to do something else at home.&#8221; He was not joking.<\/p>\n<p>When I terminated my period at ABB and returned to Italy to complete my studies, I was involved in a workshop where the local industry and the university met to discuss the future of electrical machines and drives. My former supervisor, prof. Zigliotto, was with me, too. I remember him talking to one of the CEOs of the participating industry. This CEO told him: &#8220;Look, when I receive a CV from a student of your university, I look at the grade the student has received from you. I know that your grades are a summary of the person&#8217;s technical skills, personality, and humanity. If the student has low grades in your course, I exclude it immediately even if the other grades are excellent.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>These two examples have permanently shaped my professional life. Needless to say, I have an enormous amount of respect for people who carry on their work in such a way that technical achievements are just a part of a well-rounded, healthy, and happy life, inside and outside the office.<\/p>\n<p>It is sad to see how these simple concepts of life are neglected everywhere. You do not need to go far to see people working 24\/7 and being &#8220;socially incompetent&#8221;&#8230; and for what? A name on an article? Glory? But who is giving you glory? Other 24\/7 monkeys?<\/p>\n<p>My stand is this:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>If you need to work 24\/7 to make a career, you are not smart. You are evidently missing the technical skills to do your job and go home.<\/li>\n<li>If you work 24\/7 because you have collected too many different tasks, you cannot envision a clear path for your career. Think smart and eliminate unnecessary tasks.<\/li>\n<li>If you work 24\/7 because you want to publish more than everyone else, question yourself if your publications have an impact. And I do not mean the number of references from other 24\/7 monkey articles. I mean impact as a change in society or industry. Are you contributing to a better future for everyone?<\/li>\n<li>If you work 24\/7 because you think that everyone else does it and therefore you should do it too, then you are a 24\/7 monkey. Too late.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>Every person I recruit goes through an adjustment period when they realize the way I work. I bring the challenge to them immediately from the start:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>I want your work to have an impact in society or industry.<\/li>\n<li>Publications will follow your impact. Quality over quantity.<\/li>\n<li>Be smart and have a life outside the office. Take days off and vacations to cool down.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>If you reflect on it, these three points are the most challenging job task ever. I ask you to change the world with breakthrough solutions in an 8-hour working day, excluding weekends and vacations.<\/p>\n<p>If you manage to do that, you will have my respect. If you don&#8217;t, well, we tried. But at least you are not a 24\/7 monkey.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>A big misconception in the academic world is that working hard and working smart are the same. Well, they are not. You could also entitle this post &#8220;Save yourself before it is too late.&#8221; It is a message to those falling into the spiral of death in academia. We need to go back in time: &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.kth.se\/blogs\/emd\/2024\/09\/working-hard-or-working-smart\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;Working hard, or working smart?&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1338,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"inline_featured_image":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-406","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-okategoriserat"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.kth.se\/blogs\/emd\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/406","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.kth.se\/blogs\/emd\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.kth.se\/blogs\/emd\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.kth.se\/blogs\/emd\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1338"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.kth.se\/blogs\/emd\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=406"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/www.kth.se\/blogs\/emd\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/406\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":430,"href":"https:\/\/www.kth.se\/blogs\/emd\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/406\/revisions\/430"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.kth.se\/blogs\/emd\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=406"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.kth.se\/blogs\/emd\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=406"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.kth.se\/blogs\/emd\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=406"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}