{"id":1007,"date":"2021-11-15T14:11:14","date_gmt":"2021-11-15T13:11:14","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.kth.se\/blogs\/hist\/?p=1007"},"modified":"2021-11-15T14:11:14","modified_gmt":"2021-11-15T13:11:14","slug":"open-access-to-knowledge-fear-and-conscience-reasons-to-stop-flying-because-of-climate-change","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.kth.se\/blogs\/hist\/2021\/11\/open-access-to-knowledge-fear-and-conscience-reasons-to-stop-flying-because-of-climate-change\/","title":{"rendered":"Open Access to Knowledge, Fear, and Conscience: Reasons to Stop Flying Because of Climate Change"},"content":{"rendered":"

Division professor Nina Wormbs researches along with Maria Wolrath S\u00f6derberg from S\u00f6dert\u00f6rn University, in the project Understanding justification of climate change nonaction. The project runs 2019-2021 and is financed by The Swedish foundation for humanities and social sciences, Riksbankens Jubileumsfond. This June Nina and Marie published the article Knowledge, Fear, and Conscience: Reasons to Stop Flying Because of Climate Change in Urban Planning. Find the link to full text and read the abstract below.<\/h4>\n
\"\"
Photo by Marcus Zymmer<\/a> on Unsplash<\/a><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

Link to Publishers full text.<\/a><\/p>\n

Link to Understanding justification of climate change nonaction project page\u00a0<\/a><\/p>\n

Abstract<\/span><\/h4>\n

Much research on the societal consequences of climate change has focused on inaction, seeking to explain why societies and individuals do not change according to experts\u2019 recommendations. In this qualitative study, we instead consider people who have changed their behaviour for the sake of the climate: They have stopped travelling by air. We first asked them to elaborate their rationales for the behaviour change. Then, using topos theory to find thought structures, we analysed their 673 open-text answers. Several themes emerged, which together can be regarded as a process of change. Increased knowledge, primarily narrated as a process by which latent knowledge was transformed into insight, through experience or emotional distress, was important. Contrary to certain claims in the literature, fear stimulated change of behaviour for many in this group. Climate change was framed as a moral issue, requiring acts of conscience. Children were invoked as educators and moral guides. Role models and a supportive social context played an important part. Alternatives to flying were brought forward as a motive to refrain from flying. Only a few mentioned shame as momentous. Instead, stopping travelling by air invoked a feeling of agency and responsibility, and could also result in a positive sensation.<\/p>\n

Keywords<\/strong>:\u00a0\u00a0<\/span>arguments; children; climate change; flight shame; inner deliberation; knowledge-action gap; stop flying; topos<\/div>\n
Published<\/strong>:\u00a0\u00a0<\/span>\u00a09 June 2021<\/div>\n
Issue<\/strong>:\u00a0\u00a0<\/span>\u00a0Vol 6, No 2 (2021): Cities, Long-Distance Travel, and Climate Impacts<\/a><\/div>\n
DOI<\/span><\/strong>:\u00a0https:\/\/doi.org\/10.17645\/up.v6i2.3974<\/a><\/div>\n<\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Division professor Nina Wormbs researches along with Maria Wolrath S\u00f6derberg from S\u00f6dert\u00f6rn University, in the project Understanding justification of climate change nonaction. The project runs 2019-2021 and is financed by The Swedish foundation for humanities and social sciences, Riksbankens Jubileumsfond. This June Nina and Marie published the article Knowledge, Fear, and Conscience: Reasons to Stop […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1111,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"inline_featured_image":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[4],"tags":[21,15,164,86,26],"class_list":["post-1007","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-research","tag-climate-change","tag-environmental-humanities","tag-flight-shame","tag-open-access","tag-publications"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"post_mailing_queue_ids":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.kth.se\/blogs\/hist\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1007","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.kth.se\/blogs\/hist\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.kth.se\/blogs\/hist\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.kth.se\/blogs\/hist\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1111"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.kth.se\/blogs\/hist\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1007"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.kth.se\/blogs\/hist\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1007\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1009,"href":"https:\/\/www.kth.se\/blogs\/hist\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1007\/revisions\/1009"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.kth.se\/blogs\/hist\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1007"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.kth.se\/blogs\/hist\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1007"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.kth.se\/blogs\/hist\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1007"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}