Sources of refrigerant property data

written by Pavel Makhnatch (under supervision of Rahmatollah Khodabandeh and Björn Palm)

Published Mar 23, 2016

Traditionally most of the needed refrigerant properties could be found in the tables and plots listed in refrigeration books. With current pace of refrigerant development, there is a need to get property data of ever growing amount of new refrigerants. This is when the electronic property databases comes handy. In this article we will review some of the databases available.

Refrigerant properties

Various refrigerants have different properties that greatly influence the refrigeration system design and performance. To design a specific refrigeration system one relies on a set of thermodynamic property data that is often found in specific refrigerant property databases. But where does this data come from?

While it is possible to measure some thermodynamic properties of a given fluid (as for instance temperature and pressure), there are a number of properties that cannot be directly measured (e.g. enthalpy) and therefore calculated using certain thermodynamic relations. The relation between thermodynamic properties at a specific state is known as equation of state (denoted as EoS).

Pv=Rt is an example of an equation of state of an ideal gas. Real fluids often cannot be approximated to be considered as ideal gases and therefore more complex EoS used. Most current refrigerants are described by EoS built based on Helmholtz energy formulations. The form of such EoS normally relies on a limited amount of experimentally obtained properties. The information about the EoS used to describe a certain substance is normally referred in the available databases (Figure 1).

Figure 1 – Example of EoS data for a refrigerant in Refprop 9.1 database

Reliable EoS require reliable input properties. The challenge with new refrigerants’ properties is that the quality measured data is often not available at an early stage of development and therefore such new substances are often missing from databases. There is, however, possibly to define such new substance using simplified EoS and limited amount of properties (as little as just the structural form of molecule and its natural boiling point) [1]. While such methods are not providing exact property data, such properties can still be used provided one is aware of the uncertainties of such data.


REFPROP [2] is perhaps the most known and the most used fluid thermodynamic and transport properties database out there. It is developed by NIST, the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology.

The property data can be accessed directly through the graphical interphase, or indirectly from a number of supported environments as for instance Excel, Mathlab and Python. The graphical interphase provides good functionality and have many useful functions as for instance plotting the property diagrams and generating property tables. For complete set of functionality one can refer to the REFPROP manual [3]. Fully functional free REFPROP version with very limited set of fluids is also available [4].  

The number of fluids supported by the latest REFPORP 9.1 is greater than a hundred and includes such new refrigerants as R1234yf and R1234ze(E). As the program cannot be automatically updated, the new fluids are often published online [REF]. For instance it is now possible to add support to such new refrigerants as R1234ze(Z) and R1233zd(E) by downloading respective files. When such updates are not available, it is still possible to user define a substance by providing a set of known data. In this case the user should be aware on the uncertainty the calculated properties can have when using this method.

Many new refrigerants are mixtures of a few substances. REFPROP offers possibility to select a mixture from a list of predefined mixtures or define a new one based on the mixture composition. A number of new refrigerant mixtures that is not predefined in original REFPROP 9.1 is available for download from their website [5]. This update includes many new refrigerant mixtures (e.g. R449A, R448A, R452A, R513A) and is constantly updated, with the most recent additions this year being refrigerants R449B and R454A.

When calculating properties of a refrigerant mixture REFPROP relies on specific mixing parameters that are listed in a special text file (HMX.BNC). For a number of new mixtures that contain HFOs the mixing parameters were not defined until recently. Now it is possible to request the updated HMX.BNC file and reliably predict mixtures as for instance such as R448A that consist of fluids R32, R125, R134a, R1234yf, and R1234ze(E). It should be noted that without replacing the HMX.BNC file with its new version REFROP will not calculate the properties of such new mixtures correctly.


Coolprop [6] is a closest alternative to REFPROP. In fact, it was developed with some input from Eric Lemmon [6], the person behind the development of REFPROP. Unlike REFPROP, it is not a standalone program, but rather a thermodynamic and transport properties library, that should be accessed from other programs. The list of supported programs and environments is constantly updated and now include the majority of programming languages and platforms of technical interest as EES, Excel, Matlab, Python and etc. There is also web interface under development.

The amount of fluids included in Coolprop is similar to that included in REFPROP. The major difference here is that there is limited possibility to work with refrigerant mixtures. Some common refrigerant mixtures are presented in the list of fluids, and there is limited possibility to user define mixtures. But defining the mixtures of many new refrigerant is impractical, as can only be done by imputing a set of data describing interaction behavior for mixture components.

The major advantage of the Coolprop is that it is an open-source software that is free to download and use. In return the developers ask a user to make a reference to CoolProp if it is used in an academic work.

Other sources

Another source of refrigerant property data are the refrigerant manufacturers themselves. For instance, two major refrigerant manufacturers – Honeywell and Chemours – each offer tools to obtain refrigerant property data. DUPREX [7] is the tool provided by Chemours. In addition to a number of convention refrigerants, as R134a and R404A, the tool provides data on properties of several new refrigerants as for instance R449A, DR-7, DR-5 and etc.

Genetron Properties [8] is a similar program from Honeywell. Both programs provides similar functionality. In adition to the refrigerant property data, both programs offer cycle evaluation functionality where user can select on of a few predefined cycles and calculate necessary parameters. While somewhat similar, Genetron Properties has greater functionality compared to Duprex as has greater amount of predefined cycles and greater functionality when working with refrigerant properties.

User interfaces of DUPREX and Genetron Properties are presented on Figures 2 and 3 respectively.

Figure 2 –DUPREX user interface
Figure 3 – Genetron Properties user interface

While there are a number of smaller softwares that provide access to refrigerant properties, there is only one that we will mention here Engineering Equation Solver (EES). EES is known software that gained its popularity partly due to the property data that is embedded into the software. As for the refrigerants, it contains a list of refrigerants, including new ones. Moreover, current version of the EES provides aces to R1243zf property data, unlike any other software discussed here. The list of supported refrigerant mixtures is hovewer limited to a few refrigerants.

The described software cover a wide range of needs when it comes to obtaining refrigerant properties. REFPROP is still state of the art in the field of calculating property data. It strongest competitive advantage is its comprehensive functionality and ability to calculate property data of many new refrigerant mixtures. Coolprop is the only software that can be considered as an alternative to REFPROP. While having somewhat limited functionality due to the absent of graphical interphase, it has an advantage of being free open-source software, thus having all prerequisites to be developed further. We As it comes to the software from refrigerant manufacturers, it can be considered as a source of reference property data, especially when it comes to the properties of new refrigerant mixtures. As a bonus, embedded refrigeration cycles make them very useful when in need of a quick check.

Följ gärna våra publikationer och få vårt digitala nyhetsbrev. Anmäl dig genom att följa länken


[1] J.S. Brown, C. Zilio, A. Cavallini, Thermodynamic properties of eight fluorinated olefins, Int. J. Refrig. 33 (2010) 235–241. doi:10.1016/j.ijrefrig.2009.04.005.

[2] NIST, NIST Reference Fluid Thermodynamic and Transport Properties Database (REFPROP): Version 9.1, (2015).

[3] E.W. Lemmon, M.L. Huber, M.O. Mclinden, NIST Reference Fluid Thermodynamic and Transport Properties — REFPROP 9.0 user’s guide, (2010).

[4] NIST, mini-REFPROP, (2014). (accessed March 2, 2016).

[5] NIST, Answers to Frequently Asked Questions, (2016). (accessed March 2, 2016).

[6] I.H. Bell, J. Wronski, S. Quoilin, V. Lemort, Pure and Pseudo-pure Fluid Thermophysical Property Evaluation and the Open-Source Thermophysical Property Library CoolProp, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 53 (2014) 2498–2508. doi:10.1021/ie4033999.

[7] Chemours, Chemours Refrigerant ExpertTM (DUPREX) Software, (2015). (accessed March 2, 2016).

[8] Honeywell, Genetron Properties Suite | European Refrigerants, (2016). (accessed March 2, 2016).

Belongs to: Department of Energy Technology
Last changed: Mar 23, 2016


Title Date
Developments on the refrigerant front during the past year Jan 03, 2019
Low GWP refrigerants: previous and ongoing projects Dec 03, 2018
Environmentally friendly refrigeration systems are needed to mitigate the climate change Sep 28, 2018
Natural refrigerants in focus of the Gustav Lorentzen conference Aug 14, 2018
Research focused on safe use of combustible refrigerants Jul 11, 2018
Highlights from the conference on cold chain and refrigeration exhibition in China Apr 30, 2018
The effects of the F-Gas Regulation concern the heat pump industry Apr 30, 2018
New F-gas regulation quota is in place. Are we on track to meet it? Feb 08, 2018
This happened in refrigerant development during the past year Feb 07, 2018
F-gases: do we know what they are? Feb 07, 2018
Emissions of fluorinated gases and their emission reduction Jan 09, 2018
Ten non-flammable alternatives to R404A Aug 24, 2017
Refrigerants: current developments Aug 22, 2017
The future of R404A and other refrigerants with high GWP values as prices rise Aug 09, 2017
Refrigerants: what to expect in the future Jun 19, 2017
Standards and their role in refrigerants development Feb 07, 2017
This happened in refrigerant development during the past year Jan 27, 2017
Environmentally friendly refrigerants of the future Jan 27, 2017
An option to replace R404A in small refrigeration systems Nov 14, 2016
Highlights form the Gustav Lorentzen conference on natural fluids. Nov 13, 2016
The opportunities and challenges of R152a. Part 2. Nov 12, 2016
The opportunities and challenges of R152a. Part 1. Nov 12, 2016
Sources of refrigerant property data Mar 23, 2016
A year in low GWP refrigerants development Mar 18, 2016
Reducing environmental impact of refrigeration technology Feb 29, 2016
The potential dangers of TFA Nov 01, 2015
Key news in low GWP refrigerants developments Nov 01, 2015
HFO refrigerants explained Oct 31, 2015
Understanding refrigerant flammability Jun 23, 2015
New opportunities for R32 Jun 21, 2015
A guide to F-gas regulation guides Apr 21, 2015
In short about R1234ze Apr 21, 2015
Replacements for R404A Oct 22, 2014
R1336mzz-Z - new generation nonflammable low GWP refrigerant Sep 21, 2014
Low GWP refrigerants for high temperature heat pumps Sep 21, 2014
Safety of new low GWP refrigerants Sep 05, 2014
Can global temperature change potential replace GWP in upcoming regulations? Apr 16, 2014
Quantifying global warming potential Apr 23, 2014
New F-gas Directive, one step closer to the final decision! Feb 02, 2014
A year in new low GWP refrigerants development Feb 02, 2014
Defining “Low GWP” Nov 04, 2013
Which refrigerant replaces next R410A? Nov 03, 2013
New opportunities for natural refrigerants Oct 31, 2013
Uncertain future of fluorinated refrigerants Oct 29, 2013
European Commission’s feedback on MAC Directive implementation issues Oct 28, 2013
R-1234yf to be used in MAC systems, despite safety concerns Oct 26, 2013
Environmental metrics for evaluating refrigeration systems operation Oct 25, 2013
Low GWP alternative refrigerants in heat pumps Oct 25, 2013
Mercedes-Benz wishes to continue using the tried-and-tested R-134a refrigerant in passenger cars Sep 28, 2012
Stability and compatibility of HFOs Aug 07, 2012
Counterfeit refrigerants are on the rise Jul 16, 2012
European Commission sets new deadline: manufacturers may continue to use old refrigerants May 18, 2012
Sweden accelerates the transition towards HFC alternatives May 10, 2012
Refrigerant effect on system performance May 08, 2012
Welcome Mar 30, 2012