The framework of the course is a comprehensive project task where students apply theories and methods for user centered design. This task presupposes that the students must work individually and in groups in parallel to the course schedule. Three individual tasks will also be performed during the course.
DH2621 Human-Computer Interaction, Advanced Course 6.0 credits
This course has been discontinued.
Last planned examination: Autumn 2011
Decision to discontinue this course:
No information insertedContent and learning outcomes
Course contents
Intended learning outcomes
In the course the student shall show that she can:
- analyse practice (needs and possibilities), apply methods and deliver suggestions to solutions on a given situation, motivate and criticise design decisions
- integrate, compare and relate theory and practice
- make decisions base on relevant motivation
- act independent (“captain”), theorize, generalize, go beyond established principles and theories.
Literature and preparations
Specific prerequisites
One of the courses 2D1620/DH2620 Human-computer Interaction, first course and 2D1406 Fundamentals of Human-computer Interaction.
Recommended prerequisites
Equipment
Literature
Interaction Design. Preece, Sharp, Rogers. 2002
Examination and completion
If the course is discontinued, students may request to be examined during the following two academic years.
Grading scale
Examination
- INL1 - Assignments, 3.0 credits, grading scale: A, B, C, D, E, FX, F
- PRO1 - Project, 3.0 credits, grading scale: P, F
Based on recommendation from KTH’s coordinator for disabilities, the examiner will decide how to adapt an examination for students with documented disability.
The examiner may apply another examination format when re-examining individual students.
In this course all the regulations of the code of honor at the School of Computer science and Communication apply, see: http://www.kth.se/csc/student/hederskodex/1.17237?l=en_UK.
Other requirements for final grade
Home work (INL1; 3 cr.).
Project (PRO1; 3 cr.).
Opportunity to complete the requirements via supplementary examination
Opportunity to raise an approved grade via renewed examination
Examiner
Ethical approach
- All members of a group are responsible for the group's work.
- In any assessment, every student shall honestly disclose any help received and sources used.
- In an oral assessment, every student shall be able to present and answer questions about the entire assignment and solution.
Further information
Course room in Canvas
Offered by
Main field of study
Education cycle
Add-on studies
2D1408 Evaluation Methods in Human Computer Interaction, 2D1655 Cooperative IT-design, 2D1416 Computer Support for Cooperative Work, 2D1418 Language Engineering, 2I1130 Cognitive Psychology.