Class information for: |
Basic class information |
Class id | #P | Avg. number of references |
Database coverage of references |
---|---|---|---|
14715 | 754 | 54.1 | 19% |
Hierarchy of classes |
The table includes all classes above and classes immediately below the current class. |
Cluster id | Level | Cluster label | #P |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 4 | ECONOMICS//EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH//PSYCHOL | 3876184 |
106 | 3 | LAW//FORDHAM LAW REVIEW//BUSINESS LAWYER | 71924 |
873 | 2 | LAW//AMERICAN CRIMINAL LAW REVIEW//CRIMINAL LAW REVIEW | 11512 |
14715 | 1 | LAW//FACT FINDING//OPTIMAL STANDARD OF EVIDENCE | 754 |
Terms with highest relevance score |
rank | Term | termType | Chi square | Shr. of publ. in class containing term |
Class's shr. of term's tot. occurrences |
#P with term in class |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | LAW | WoSSC | 167983 | 88% | 1% | 661 |
2 | FACT FINDING | authKW | 92560 | 1% | 57% | 4 |
3 | OPTIMAL STANDARD OF EVIDENCE | authKW | 80993 | 0% | 100% | 2 |
4 | JUDICIAL ERRORS | authKW | 72891 | 0% | 60% | 3 |
5 | LAW PROBABILITY & RISK | journal | 69805 | 1% | 17% | 10 |
6 | PRESUMPTIONS | authKW | 64790 | 1% | 40% | 4 |
7 | STANDARD OF PROOF | authKW | 53277 | 1% | 26% | 5 |
8 | BOSTON UNIVERSITY LAW REVIEW | journal | 46205 | 5% | 3% | 37 |
9 | PROBATIVE VALUE | authKW | 43190 | 1% | 27% | 4 |
10 | ACCESS TO PROOF | authKW | 40496 | 0% | 100% | 1 |
Web of Science journal categories |
Rank | Term | Chi square | Shr. of publ. in class containing term |
Class's shr. of term's tot. occurrences |
#P with term in class |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Law | 167983 | 88% | 1% | 661 |
2 | Criminology & Penology | 1374 | 5% | 0% | 34 |
3 | Economics | 387 | 9% | 0% | 65 |
4 | Social Sciences, Mathematical Methods | 145 | 2% | 0% | 14 |
5 | Philosophy | 80 | 2% | 0% | 14 |
6 | Ethics | 80 | 1% | 0% | 9 |
7 | Theater | 75 | 1% | 0% | 4 |
8 | Psychology, Social | 38 | 1% | 0% | 11 |
9 | Psychology, Biological | 26 | 1% | 0% | 6 |
10 | Social Issues | 23 | 1% | 0% | 5 |
Address terms |
Rank | Term | Chi square | Shr. of publ. in class containing term |
Class's shr. of term's tot. occurrences |
#P with term in class |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | ADVISORY COMMITTEE HLTH DISABIL | 40496 | 0% | 100% | 1 |
2 | C ITAL JURY PROJECT PHASE 2 | 40496 | 0% | 100% | 1 |
3 | DERECHO INTERNAC DERECHOS HUMANOS | 40496 | 0% | 100% | 1 |
4 | MIL LAW OFF | 40496 | 0% | 100% | 1 |
5 | PROGRAM GENDER CULTURE | 40496 | 0% | 100% | 1 |
6 | TAUBEN LAG CRIMINAL LAW | 40496 | 0% | 100% | 1 |
7 | WALTHER RATHENAU ORGANISATIONSTHEORIE | 40496 | 0% | 100% | 1 |
8 | LAW | 38442 | 23% | 1% | 170 |
9 | CRIMINAL JURISPRUDENCE | 20247 | 0% | 50% | 1 |
10 | FLAWN | 20247 | 0% | 50% | 1 |
Journals |
Rank | Term | Chi square | Shr. of publ. in class containing term |
Class's shr. of term's tot. occurrences |
#P with term in class |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | LAW PROBABILITY & RISK | 69805 | 1% | 17% | 10 |
2 | BOSTON UNIVERSITY LAW REVIEW | 46205 | 5% | 3% | 37 |
3 | HASTINGS LAW JOURNAL | 31307 | 4% | 3% | 30 |
4 | MINNESOTA LAW REVIEW | 30826 | 4% | 2% | 31 |
5 | JOURNAL OF CRIMINAL LAW & CRIMINOLOGY | 22697 | 3% | 2% | 23 |
6 | AMERICAN CRIMINAL LAW REVIEW | 19220 | 3% | 2% | 23 |
7 | MILITARY LAW REVIEW | 16718 | 2% | 3% | 14 |
8 | WASHINGTON LAW REVIEW | 11709 | 2% | 2% | 16 |
9 | FORDHAM LAW REVIEW | 11260 | 3% | 1% | 25 |
10 | JOURNAL OF LAW ECONOMICS & ORGANIZATION | 9908 | 2% | 2% | 13 |
Author Key Words |
Rank | Term | Chi square | Shr. of publ. in class containing term |
Class's shr. of term's tot. occurrences |
#P with term in class |
LCSH search | Wikipedia search |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | FACT FINDING | 92560 | 1% | 57% | 4 | Search FACT+FINDING | Search FACT+FINDING |
2 | OPTIMAL STANDARD OF EVIDENCE | 80993 | 0% | 100% | 2 | Search OPTIMAL+STANDARD+OF+EVIDENCE | Search OPTIMAL+STANDARD+OF+EVIDENCE |
3 | JUDICIAL ERRORS | 72891 | 0% | 60% | 3 | Search JUDICIAL+ERRORS | Search JUDICIAL+ERRORS |
4 | PRESUMPTIONS | 64790 | 1% | 40% | 4 | Search PRESUMPTIONS | Search PRESUMPTIONS |
5 | STANDARD OF PROOF | 53277 | 1% | 26% | 5 | Search STANDARD+OF+PROOF | Search STANDARD+OF+PROOF |
6 | PROBATIVE VALUE | 43190 | 1% | 27% | 4 | Search PROBATIVE+VALUE | Search PROBATIVE+VALUE |
7 | ACCESS TO PROOF | 40496 | 0% | 100% | 1 | Search ACCESS+TO+PROOF | Search ACCESS+TO+PROOF |
8 | ADVERSARIAL BIAS | 40496 | 0% | 100% | 1 | Search ADVERSARIAL+BIAS | Search ADVERSARIAL+BIAS |
9 | BAYESIAN NORMS | 40496 | 0% | 100% | 1 | Search BAYESIAN+NORMS | Search BAYESIAN+NORMS |
10 | BURDEN OF PERSUASION AND PRODUCTION | 40496 | 0% | 100% | 1 | Search BURDEN+OF+PERSUASION+AND+PRODUCTION | Search BURDEN+OF+PERSUASION+AND+PRODUCTION |
Core articles |
The table includes core articles in the class. The following variables is taken into account for the relevance score of an article in a cluster c: (1) Number of references referring to publications in the class. (2) Share of total number of active references referring to publications in the class. (3) Age of the article. New articles get higher score than old articles. (4) Citation rate, normalized to year. |
Rank | Reference | # ref. in cl. |
Shr. of ref. in cl. |
Citations |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | CLERMONT, KM , (2013) DEATH OF PARADOX: THE KILLER LOGIC BENEATH THE STANDARDS OF PROOF.NOTRE DAME LAW REVIEW. VOL. 88. ISSUE 3. P. 1061 -1138 | 32 | 60% | 1 |
2 | PARDO, MS , (2013) THE NATURE AND PURPOSE OF EVIDENCE THEORY.VANDERBILT LAW REVIEW. VOL. 66. ISSUE 2. P. 547 -613 | 34 | 55% | 2 |
3 | KAPLOW, L , (2012) BURDEN OF PROOF.YALE LAW JOURNAL. VOL. 121. ISSUE 4. P. 738-859 | 23 | 66% | 30 |
4 | LEUBSDORF, J , (2006) PRESUPPOSITIONS OF EVIDENCE LAW.IOWA LAW REVIEW. VOL. 91. ISSUE 4. P. 1209-1258 | 33 | 54% | 6 |
5 | DOUGLASS, JG , (2000) BALANCING HEARSAY AND CRIMINAL DISCOVERY.FORDHAM LAW REVIEW. VOL. 68. ISSUE 6. P. 2097 -2197 | 21 | 91% | 8 |
6 | VAN KESSEL, G , (1998) HEARSAY HAZARDS IN THE AMERICAN CRIMINAL TRIAL: AN ADVERSARY-ORIENTED APPROACH.HASTINGS LAW JOURNAL. VOL. 49. ISSUE 3. P. 477 -544 | 23 | 88% | 9 |
7 | CALLEN, CR , (1994) HEARSAY AND INFORMAL REASONING.VANDERBILT LAW REVIEW. VOL. 47. ISSUE 1. P. 43-113 | 29 | 81% | 7 |
8 | BELLIN, J , (2012) THE INCREDIBLE SHRINKING CONFRONTATION CLAUSE.BOSTON UNIVERSITY LAW REVIEW. VOL. 92. ISSUE 6. P. 1865-1916 | 17 | 77% | 5 |
9 | ENOCH, D , FISHER, T , (2015) SENSE AND "SENSITIVITY": EPISTEMIC AND INSTRUMENTAL APPROACHES TO STATISTICAL EVIDENCE.STANFORD LAW REVIEW. VOL. 67. ISSUE 3. P. 557 -611 | 20 | 59% | 1 |
10 | SEIGEL, ML , (1992) RATIONALIZING HEARSAY - A PROPOSAL FOR A BEST EVIDENCE HEARSAY RULE.BOSTON UNIVERSITY LAW REVIEW. VOL. 72. ISSUE 5. P. 893-950 | 27 | 87% | 11 |
Classes with closest relation at Level 1 |