Skip to main content
Till KTH:s startsida

IC2003 Research Methodology and Scientific Communication 7.5 credits

Information per course offering

Course offerings are missing for current or upcoming semesters.

Course syllabus as PDF

Please note: all information from the Course syllabus is available on this page in an accessible format.

Course syllabus IC2003 (Autumn 2009–)
Headings with content from the Course syllabus IC2003 (Autumn 2009–) are denoted with an asterisk ( )

Content and learning outcomes

Course contents

This course will introduce and provide practice of the basic problems in scietific communication and research methodology. These include:
- finding a research theme, problem and specific question
- finding and valuing scientific literature
- reasoning and structuring an argument on different levels
- presentation techniques
- citing, referencing and paraphrasing
- data types, gathering data, data analysis
- quantitative methods and analysis
- qualitative methods and analysis

Intended learning outcomes

- be able to locate and summarize scientific literature
- understand and apply correct ways of referencing to and citing from scientific literature
- be able to discuss and explain the differences between different methodologies
- be able to find relevant literature
- be able to analyze, contrast, compare and criticize scientific literature
compose a report with a coherent line of reasoning
- be able to apply and use scientific methods
- be able to assess the quality of scientific literature
- be able to discuss the student’s own position relative to the research conducted

Literature and preparations

Specific prerequisites

No information inserted

Recommended prerequisites

No information inserted

Equipment

No information inserted

Literature

Preliminary

Wayne C. Booth, Gregory G. Colomb, and Joseph M. Williams: The Craft of Research (Upplaga: 3rd Edition), The University of Chicago Press - Chicago Guides t, 2008

Example articles (electronically)

Recommended literature:
Data Collection and Analysis, Victor Jupp and Roger Sapsford (Eds.)
Upplaga: 2nd Edition, Förlag: Sage, År: 2006

Examination and completion

If the course is discontinued, students may request to be examined during the following two academic years.

Grading scale

A, B, C, D, E, FX, F

Examination

  • INL1 - Assignment, 1.5 credits, grading scale: P, F
  • INL2 - Assignment, 1.5 credits, grading scale: P, F
  • INL3 - Assignment, 1.5 credits, grading scale: A, B, C, D, E, FX, F
  • INL4 - Assignment, 3.0 credits, grading scale: A, B, C, D, E, FX, F

Based on recommendation from KTH’s coordinator for disabilities, the examiner will decide how to adapt an examination for students with documented disability.

The examiner may apply another examination format when re-examining individual students.

Opportunity to complete the requirements via supplementary examination

No information inserted

Opportunity to raise an approved grade via renewed examination

No information inserted

Examiner

Ethical approach

  • All members of a group are responsible for the group's work.
  • In any assessment, every student shall honestly disclose any help received and sources used.
  • In an oral assessment, every student shall be able to present and answer questions about the entire assignment and solution.

Further information

Course room in Canvas

Registered students find further information about the implementation of the course in the course room in Canvas. A link to the course room can be found under the tab Studies in the Personal menu at the start of the course.

Offered by

Main field of study

This course does not belong to any Main field of study.

Education cycle

Second cycle

Add-on studies

No information inserted

Contact

Harko Verhagen, verhagen@dsv.su.se, tel. 08-16 16 94

Supplementary information

Only students from the ICT master programs EMIS and ICSS are admitted.