KTH Logo

No, engineers are not the nation’s enemies

Sometimes columnists get it wrong! A recent example can be found in Aftonbladet, where Saga Cavallin in her culture article  ”Här är väljargruppen som ingen pratar om” (Here is the voter group nobody talks about) published on 13 September, uses vacuity as an argument to attribute all manner of evils to engineers.

Cavallin writes that “The engineering mindset of the Swedish national character has given us ball bearings, Bluetooth and dynamite. But it has also been blamed for racial biology, forced sterilisation and the global export of soulless arena EDM. Perhaps it is also partly responsible for four years of the most sadistic, inhumane and anti-democratic politics witnessed on this side of the 1930s.”

This argument is based on two unusually flimsy lines of reasoning. The first is a study of around a hundred people active in anti-media online communities, half of whom were found to have an engineering background. The second is the book Engineers of Jihad, which claims that engineers are over-represented among violent Islamist groups. In the study, around 200 people could be linked to a specific educational background, of whom just under 45 per cent had studied engineering subjects.

Even more serious is the conflation of over-representation with the characteristics of the majority. While it may be true that 50 people in a study of hostility towards the media are over-represented in relation to that group’s share of the labour market, to conclude that this characteristic is possessed by the majority of practising engineers is misleading and incorrect.

It is similar to when it has been noted that immigrant men are over-represented among rapists, and this characteristic is then attributed to all immigrant men. Similarly, when it is said that people with certain mental disabilities are over-represented among those convicted of violent crimes, it is assumed that all, or a significant proportion, of people with these disabilities are potential murderers.

Similarly, it seems somewhat odd to claim that an IT consultant in Mörbylånga is likely to have a hostile attitude towards the media and an engineering-oriented mindset based on a study of Islamist groups that advocate violence in another part of the world. This line of argument is reminiscent of a 31 May 2024 editorial in Dagens Nyheter by Gina Gustavsson, who used the same study that Cavallin is now relying on to claim that there is a link between engineers and white supremacy and neo-Nazism.

Drawing the conclusion that an entire profession suffers from a democratic mindset deficit based on a hundred or so hand-picked interviews and a book on terrorism is precisely the sort of reasoning that is usually labelled populism when applied to immigrants or young people, for example. It involves selective sampling, a simplified explanatory model and a dig at a group that rarely gets a chance to defend itself in the culture pages. To label media-critical right-wing movements as populist while constructing an argument based on the same method is, to say the least, both pointless and tendentious.

While it is not unreasonable to suggest that engineering education shapes a way of thinking – as does all education – it is illogical to single out an entire professional group as enemies of the nation. Moving from this observation to singling out an entire professional group as enemies of the nation requires considerably stronger evidence than has been presented. Until then, it is merely a prejudiced game of pick-up sticks dressed up in an unworthy scientific guise.

Strengthening total defence through knowledge and research

As is well known, building up total defence is a task in which all sectors of society are involved. In recent years, this work has intensified, with significant resources also being allocated to it. Universities, too, must adapt to the new societal challenges arising from the increased need for resilience, as well as the development of civil and military capabilities in order to cope with a more turbulent world.

Some time ago, the KTH Centre for total defence was established with the aim of increasing our visibility and capacity in matters relating to total defence. The Centre was also set up to gather and disseminate knowledge regarding relevant research and education. KTH is also responsible for Cybercampus Sweden, a national initiative that promotes research, education and innovation in the field of cyber security.

The Svenskt Krut centre was inaugurated this week at KTH, in collaboration with the FMV (Swedish Defence Materiel Administration), the FOI (Swedish Defence Research Agency), and Swedish industry. The centre’s aim is to secure the national supply chain for the raw materials used in the production of nitrocellulose-based ammunition. The basic research required, which has a range of other applications, is well suited to a university environment given KTH’s expertise and research excellence built up over many years.

There are further examples of areas in which universities must take a more proactive approach to total defence needs today. They must also define what is and isn’t appropriate for them to work on. This is also important for the education sector, where the need for skills development and provision is becoming increasingly apparent as a result of the current international situation and geopolitical tensions.

Swedish research plays a long-term role in strengthening Sweden’s total defence and self-sufficiency. Svensk Krut is another piece of the jigsaw in this regard, where we, as a university, bring together the societal challenges we face with the successful research and education environments available at KTH.

A warm welcome to KTH!

The induction of new students is in full swing on campus. Senior students are welcoming this year’s freshers to the campus, their chosen degree program, and the student community. This is a clear sign that the new term is about to begin.

The introduction program at KTH is an important part of the fine traditions that define student life here. Starting higher education is, of course, challenging. For many international Master’s students, it also means adapting to a new country and culture. A warm welcome helps students to lay the foundations for academic success and build a rich social network that will support them throughout their studies.

The time spent studying is a defining period in life, during which personality and knowledge develop together. Therefore, it is important that studies are not only about mastering a subject area, but are also characterised by inclusive, equal and democratic values. I firmly believe that our approach also conveys this important added value.

The number of eligible applicants to KTH has risen by 4.4 per cent this year compared with last year, whereas the national increase is just 1.3 per cent. However, we are admitting slightly fewer students this year, meaning that competition for a place at KTH has increased. The merit points required for admission have also increased for most of our degree programs. We are encouraged by the fact that we are an attractive and popular choice for many students, both from Sweden and from other countries.

I would like to extend a warm welcome to all of you who have joined us, and thank you for choosing KTH! Finally, I would like to thank all the students and staff involved in organising the welcome event.

AI races ahead while campus estate management stalls

Surely everyone has noticed that an AI revolution is currently underway. This technological shift will bring about major changes, even if we currently find it difficult to grasp the full extent of what is happening.

This is often the case with major technological shifts. When the steam engine, electricity or the telephone first appeared, it was also hard to predict the societal changes that would follow.

AI, on the other hand, is not new. Research has been ongoing for decades, but it is only in recent years that its applications have had a widespread impact. Today, we recognise that research methods will also undergo fundamental change. With the help of AI, increasingly complex research problems can be formulated and solved more quickly than ever before. Large volumes of data can be processed rapidly, and scientific breakthroughs that would otherwise have taken years can now be achieved much more quickly thanks to access to advanced computing power.

AI is already transforming research methods, as well as the conditions for business and the public sector. Complex problems can be analysed more quickly, large volumes of data can be handled more efficiently, and new products and services are emerging at a rapid pace.

Universities have a special role to play in this development. On the one hand, the new knowledge on which AI is based is generated through successful research. On the other hand, AI is transforming the content of education and research itself. We must remain at the forefront of knowledge development while also finding time to study and address the ethical, environmental, and social consequences of this technological shift.

Universities suddenly find themselves at the centre of a technological arms race in a geopolitically turbulent world where science, diplomacy and international conflicts are intertwined in ways that politics, academia and the business sector are not accustomed to dealing with. This therefore requires rigorous yet agile and adaptable analysis, along with clear priorities, so that Sweden and Europe can take responsibility, foster independence, and reduce vulnerability.

If I had written about this topic a year ago, or were to write about it a year from now, the text would be completely different, simply because developments are moving so rapidly. This is in stark contrast to another topic I often write about: akademiska hus and the provision of university premises. In that area, developments are so slow that every piece of writing on the subject seems just as relevant year after year. Imagine if it were the other way around 🙂

Developments hardly ever take a summer break, but I hope that many of you will have the chance to do so. Summer greetings from Almedalen!

KTH ready for Almedalsveckan

Almedalen Week is almost here. From 22–26 June, almost 3,000 events covering every conceivable policy and political issue will be held. As it is an election year, there will probably be more focus on policy announcements and positioning by the parties ahead of the election campaign.

KTH is, of course, on site. Researchers from KTH are participating in a variety of seminars, panel discussions and roundtable talks linked to the KTH Center for total defense, Cybercampus Sweden and many other initiatives. I am personally involved in several programme items with Chalmers and Lund University, as well as with Karolinska Institutet and Stockholm University through the University Alliance Stockholm Trio and the Stockholm Science City Foundation. I am also participating in quite a few other events organised by various other organisations.

As usual, it’s a week filled with public debates, discussions and meetings involving thousands of people and organisations. As mentioned, we can expect the political parties to try to gain an advantage ahead of the election this year. Hopefully, issues such as the supply of talent in STEM, Sweden’s role in cutting-edge technologies, the AI revolution, and Sweden’s competitiveness, capacity for innovation, and resilience in a changing world and within the framework of European Union policy will be raised — all of which are of great interest to KTH.

Find out more about KTH’s participation in Almedalen and view all the events in the official programme (in Swedish).