Author
“ The universities are the enemy. We have to attack the universities in this country honestly and aggressively.”
This is a quote from a speech made by the current Vice President of the United States in 2021, which was widely publicized as a declaration of war on higher education and research in general, and on universities’ work for gender equality, and on what was perceived as identity politics and woke ideologies in particular.Today we experience the consequences of this policy statement.
At the same time, this is part of a broader development where truth and lies merge and are interchangeable, and where loose opinions and deliberate misconceptions replaces knowledge based on facts and systematically acquired knowledge.
Politicians and opinion leaders sometimes move surprisingly freely between facts and lies, or between knowledge and loose opinion, weaving in conclusions that suit a particular agenda. In this way, everything from the climate crisis to crime statistics or facts about migration and energy supply can be washed clean of truths and made into parts of a coherent agenda that reflects an increasingly polarized society where conflicts rather than debate and democratic conversations become the driving force for change.
Universities have a very special role in the social climate we have today. Our mission is to stand for facts, to report on the frontier of knowledge, to formulate the research questions that can take society forward, and to communicate freely with the surrounding society about what we know as well as what we do not yet know.
KTH is doing just that. The professors we will welcome to their positions today are living examples of how far research can take us and how amazing results we have delivered and will deliver to society.
The dismantling of the United States as a world-leading research nation is now proceeding rapidly, and after only a few months many American research voices have been silenced. This is happening through the withdrawal of funds, banning of certain keywords, expelling foreign students and faculty, and a concerted war on all knowledge creation that contradicts the administration’s views.
The same tendencies, although less extensive, can be found in some of our European neighboring countries and, to some extent, here in Sweden.
As a university community, there is a risk that we become silent. If you are as quiet as possible, you will attract less criticism than if you stand for values that for one reason or another are perceived as provocative by some group in society. The risk of being silenced applies both to the university as an institution and to the individual researcher or research group.
Therefore. Now more than ever, we need to articulate and hold on to our moral compass. Now more than ever, we need to stand up for the values on which we believe universities as an idea is based.
KTH’s vision is to take the lead for a sustainable society. To this powerful vision, we have formulated bold goals to conduct research and education of the highest quality. But we also have two policy areas that we believe all our activities should be based on, regardless of if it is research or education.
One is that sustainability issues must permeate all activities, and the second is that, the pursuit of gender equality, diversity and equal opportunities must be an ever-present ambition.
These are two areas, two values, two moral compass directions that are increasingly being questioned in a fact-resistant debate.
Normally I would say, ‘we should not talk so much, we should do the work instead’. Today, however, I want to say, ‘we should not just do the work, we must dare to talk about the importance of standing up for what we do’.
Therefore, for all the reasons I have just mentioned, I want to say the following today.
KTH stands for academic freedom and strives for institutional autonomy. Our academic freedom and our principles of openness and transparency are fundamental to knowledge development and democracy. We are bold, creative and responsible, driven to enable a sustainable and equal society.
Our faculty and students will lead the transition towards a sustainable world by constantly incorporating sustainability issues into research and education. We will address the major societal challenges without fear or worries of reprisals. The ambition to create a sustainable society is the biggest challenge for us and it is the major challenge facing society today.
Gender equality, diversity and equal opportunities are important and fundamental values. The different characteristics, backgrounds and cultures of our staff and students are an asset that promotes high quality in our activities. We want to provide equal opportunities to different people. We want to promote diversity on campus, in the classroom, among our students and among our teachers, researchers and staff.
We stand by our values. We recognize the need for sustainability in all education and research. We stand for the importance of gender equality, diversity and equal opportunities.
Let there be no doubt about this. Please quote me!
Excerpts from the speech Anders Söderholm gave at KTH’s Academic Ceremony on 11 April 2025.
Author
Soon it will be time for KTH’s academic ceremony. It is an occasion when much of KTH’s research is described through our new professors. It is also an occasion to show KTH’s role in the development of society through the recipients of our various awards and this year’s honorary doctorates.
The professors reflect the breadth of KTH’s research through their respective disciplines. These include proteomics, technical acoustics, computer science, mathematics, biophysics, vehicle dynamics, ergonomics, metallurgy, physics, polymer materials, numerical analysis and urban planning, to name but a few.
The almost 400 professors that KTH has, according to last year’s annual report, 368 professors, 84 women and 284 men, are the most highly educated teachers and as such important role models and sources of inspiration for students at undergraduate and graduate level, as well as for the doctoral students they supervise.
This year, three honorary doctorates will be awarded at the ceremony: Uwe Bornscheuer, Professor of Biotechnology at the University of Greifswald in Germany. He has worked with KTH researchers in chemistry and biotechnology for several decades. Gunilla Franzén, PhD, has worked in the field of geosafety and has promoted a safer and more sustainable society by, among other things, paving the way for regulations for construction and infrastructure projects
Göran Sandberg, Professor of Physiological Botany at Umeå University, is being honoured for his successful work as a member of the Board of the Knut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation. During his time at KAW, several strategic programmes were launched that have been crucial to the scientific success of KTH and Sweden.
Since 1944, KTH has awarded honorary doctorates to a total of 161 people who have made a significant contribution to the development of Swedish society. The list includes many names that are recognisable from the debate and context of each era.
This year, KTH’s Great Prize 2024 is awarded Johan von Schreeb, Professor of Global Disaster Medicine at Karolinska Institutet. He is being honoured for his contributions as a researcher and coordinator in global crises and disasters, and for his efforts to alleviate human suffering. The prize was made possible by an anonymous donation to KTH in 1944.
It is fantastic to be able to share so much knowledge and academic achievement in one evening – building the society of today and tomorrow – it is the beacon of academic freedom and academic excellence to navigate by at a time when it is really needed.
Author
Recent developments in the United States regarding restrictions on academic freedom in general and changes in federal research funding in particular are cause for concern.
The United States is and has long been the world’s leading scientific nation, where researchers go to take advantage of the favourable conditions for conducting research at the highest level. The United States is also the country that has won the most Nobel Prizes, and we have become accustomed to looking up to US research universities as leaders, not least in medicine and the natural sciences.
It is dramatic to follow current developments. In the space of a few months, the picture has changed radically, with the withdrawal of federal research funding and new policies on undesirable research. The belief that the US research system is robust and unshakable has been disproved. What is striking is the speed with which the changes have been implemented and the immediate impact on universities.
From colleagues and partners in the United States, we hear the concerns and uncertainties that have emerged from a few days’ visit here. However strong and successful American universities are, it is also clear that even in the world’s leading democracy, it is possible to have a direct and powerful impact on universities and research.
This is clearly a cause for concern on a broad front. The guarantees for academic freedom in Sweden are far from strong. The belief in a benevolent government that looks after the welfare of higher education and guarantees freedom of research cannot be taken for granted. Although the focus is currently on the United States, there are similar trends in several other countries, including Europe and Sweden.
If ever there was a time to not only stand up for academic freedom and institutional autonomy, but also to seriously consider what measures need to be taken to secure these fundamental values, it is now – a task for the research community, university management, research funders and international cooperation organisations, and also for the political system to seriously ensure that something similar cannot happen in Sweden.
Author
Truth and lies are usually assumed to be opposites. What is true is, by definition, not a lie. These days it’s not so simple.
There seems to be a normalization of using half-lies and outright lies as truths, while ignoring facts that do not support the lying conclusion. A few years ago, the term ‘alternative facts’ was coined to describe an argument based not on real facts but on a more or less imaginary reality.
At the time, it was perhaps a bit funny and something that was nevertheless replaced by facts and truth when the lie was proven and exposed. This is no longer the case. The lie has become almost unproblematic to use as a cudgel in debate, and it does not matter to the believer whether the lie is exposed or not. Confidence in the liar is unshaken.
It was like a cartoon in which an offended young man says: ‘It doesn’t matter if it’s true or not, it’s still shitty’ after coming across a claim that the Swedish flag had been burned in a school.
Professor Åsa Wikforss, who gave a lecture at KTH, discussed how we should behave in the post-truth era and provided a comprehensible framework for understanding what is now happening in public debate and political positioning. That different political movements have different values on which they base their policies is not new – it is the desire to achieve certain societal values and goals, and how to get there, that is at the heart of political debate.
However, when the facts underpinning that direction describe the same social phenomena in very different ways, the debate becomes increasingly polarized and conflictual, creating a basis for disagreement between different opinions and facts and between different political views. Democratic dialogue becomes increasingly difficult.
The role of universities is, and will be, obviously important in all this. We must stand up for the facts of what we know and what we do not know.We should not mix research with political activism, and we should engage in debate based on the facts that research has shown.This applies to engineering as much as to any other science.
While the picture painted by Åsa Wikforss is somewhat bleak, it is clear that universities are needed more than ever. Our role is becoming increasingly important as the climate of debate hardens and truth and lies become interchangeable.
Author
The government’s STEM strategy, presented this week, expresses the ambition to increase the number of students in higher education in STEM subjects from 83,000 to 90,000 by 2035.
STEM, Science, Technology, Engineering & Mathematics, includes engineering programmes, and an increase in the number of students is necessary to cope with the greening, electrification and energy transition and to strengthen the competitiveness of Swedish industry.
The Swedish Public Employment Service’s occupational barometer shows great opportunities for jobs in traditional engineering professions as well as in new fields of knowledge such as cyber security. Investments in nuclear power, for example, require more skilled people throughout the value chain.
Teknikföretagen has stated that more engineers are needed for the transition and future development of the industry. Several representatives of large technology companies have said the same, and both the Confederation of Swedish Enterprise and the Swedish Association of Graduate Engineers have discussed the shortage of skilled labour.
At the same time, we are ready to expand our programmes in the shortage areas that have been identified. We can increase the number of students today and take our share of the responsibility for achieving the government’s target of 90,000 students in STEM.
Now is the time to increase the funding cap so that we can meet the demand for engineers. In our budget document we have clearly expressed the opportunities and ambitions to do more for the labour market. We can do it now, and Sweden needs it now. Therefore, the expansion to 90,000 students should be accelerated, for example in the next four to five years, so that Sweden does not fall behind in the transition
