KTH Logo

Important steps towards the green transition

Yesterday I had the great pleasure of presenting the King with a gift to celebrate his 80th birthday: a newly established visiting professorship in the field of the green transition at KTH. This was made possible thanks to generous philanthropic donations to KTH.

The green transition involves shifting towards more sustainable ways of producing, travelling and consuming energy, replacing fossil-based raw materials in the energy supply with sustainable alternatives, driving the electrification of society, reducing waste, increasing circular flows and developing new materials and modern AI tools to promote greater sustainability.

The long-term goal is to reduce emissions and resource consumption while creating a society in which prosperity and development can continue without causing environmental damage or overexploiting natural resources.

The visiting professorship model enables us to reach out to a wide range of research areas at KTH and attract leading, internationally recognized researchers to our successful research environments. Over time, we can strengthen KTH’s collective ambition to lead the way in sustainable societal development.

The Climate Action Centre is KTH’s hub for research relevant to the green transition and climate action. The professorship will be linked to the network of research areas represented by the centre. The Climate Action Centre has also recently received funding alongside Stockholm University and Karolinska Institutet.

The Climate Action Centre has recently been awarded a strategic research area (SFO) in collaboration with Stockholm University and Karolinska Institutet under the name Stockholm Centre for Climate Transition (ClimTrio).

KTH will celebrate its 200th anniversary next year, in 2027, and the intention is for the first holder of the visiting professorship to be in place in time for the academic ceremony in April 2027. I look forward welcoming that person to our community and, above all, taking another important step towards the green transition.

Extra education funding: a small step ahead

On April 13, the spring supplementary budget was presented, including an injection of 14,4 million kronor into our educational mandate for 2026 and double that amount for the following two years. The argument is that the Swedish labour market needs more Masters of Science in Engineering.

This represents an increase of just under one per cent of our ceiling amount and provides us with the extra resources needed to fulfil our educational mandate. Otherwise, we have been struggling to reduce student numbers in order to adapt to a shrinking mandate.

While this will make the reduction somewhat less severe, it is, of course, still a reduction in the number of students on Master of Science in Engineering programme compared with the previous year.

Nevertheless, it is positive that the government is prioritising this issue. It demonstrates an understanding of the needs of our high level of applicants and the opportunities this presents in terms of providing more young people with the chance to pursue higher education.

In our budget proposal, we argued that the need was far greater than the 14,4 million SEK (or 28,8 million next year), but this is nonetheless a step in the right direction. I hope that this issue has now been raised and will result in more forward-looking decisions in future.

The exam pass rate is not the whole story

The graduation rate for Master of Science engineering programmes is the subject of periodic debate, with critics claiming that too few students who enrol on a programme go on to graduate.

For taxpayers, it is a loss if many people start a programme and do not complete it. Of those who begin an engineering degree, 55 per cent graduate within the standard duration of the programme plus three years. However, if we include those who have completed 90 per cent of the course requirements, the figure rises to 73 per cent.

Almost 60 per cent of our students secure a job before completing their final term, which explains why a large group of students enter the labour market while still having exams to sit or dissertations to finish – in other words, before completing their degree programme. If we add those who start a Master of Science in Engineering programme but ultimately graduate with a different degree, this adds a further 10 per cent.

To address the group of students who have completed almost the entire programme and found employment, but still have some outstanding modules, a focused evaluation is currently underway at KTH to gather further data. As we see that some of those who do not graduate have outstanding modules in mathematics, we are strengthening capacity in maths courses through so-called “collaborative learning”, where older students provide support to younger ones. We are also working on targeted initiatives within certain programmes and on pedagogical development to support students in their studies.

While some companies require a degree when hiring, most do not. Greater and clearer recognition of the value of a degree by the business sector prior to recruitment would, of course, be of great value in increasing graduation rates.

In other words, a significantly higher proportion than 55 per cent of the students enter the labour market. At the same time, we are working hard to create the conditions that will enable engineering students who are almost there to take the final steps required for graduation.

Nordic alliance is navigating turbulent times together

Nordic Five Tech (N5T) is an alliance of the five leading technical universities in the Nordic region: KTH and Chalmers in Sweden, Aalto in Finland, DTU in Denmark, and NTNU in Norway. This year, we gathered at KTH’s campus for our annual meeting and to celebrate the alliance’s 20th anniversary.

We discussed how universities should respond to the world order characterised by increased conflict, unrest and security risks that has emerged in recent years, with geopolitics being the main theme. These themes were covered thoroughly in keynote speeches delivered by the Finnish Ambassador to Stockholm, the CEO of IVA, and representatives from industry and academia.

As has been noted many times before, it is clear that there are now many conditions and circumstances that significantly impact university operations. We must navigate in a new way, exercising sound judgement and being aware of the risks inherent in various types of collaboration.

At the same time, it is clear that the relevance of our universities is increasing. Technical research and education are needed more than ever as technology is used to develop societal resilience and defence capabilities while global competition for technological supremacy continues.

This makes it more important than ever that we hold fast to our fundamental values of open academic discourse, free research, and a commitment to international exchange, even in these challenging new times. Rather than replacing our moral compasses with something else, we must develop and strengthen them!

I am also pleased to confirm that our five universities enjoy very close and positive relationships, and that we are part of a successful and technology-oriented family of advanced universities. With this, we are ready to take on the next 20 years!

The global situation affects our daily operations

The changed and, in many respects, more complex global situation also affects universities’ activities. We must be more discerning and careful when evaluating collaborations with universities, international recruitment and industry partnerships.

This may involve security checks, checks relating to protection legislation or export controls, and customary background checks. Maintaining good judgement in everyday life about what is compatible with laws and regulations, and what is appropriate in terms of our fundamental values of academic freedom and open science, is also important. Sometimes, things that are compatible with the regulations may still be inappropriate for other reasons.

KTH has developed a system for responsible internationalization that encompasses both formal and discretionary elements. Managers responsible for decisions regarding international collaborations, for example, should be able to receive support with complex considerations, as well as with the more regulated controls that are justified.

However, geopolitics affects us in many ways. Universities are part of societal resilience and our collective total defence capability. It is important that we have crisis and emergency plans in place, setting out which societal tasks must continue and which additional tasks may be required when society is exposed to various challenges.

KTH has many research areas characterised by potential dual use, as well as research highly relevant to defence capabilities. This leads to complex considerations about whether certain research should be carried out, and how research with special protection values should be handled.

I would say that we are well organised with regard to what is usually termed responsible internationalization, and that our capabilities are constantly evolving to meet the need to be as open as possible while remaining as closed as necessary.

We have also established a centre for total defence to better fulfil our role in society’s total defence, making use of our broad expertise in areas important for total defence. This means we must define activities that are important for society and total defence. We ensure compliance with security protection legislation and export control regulations, and analyse key vulnerabilities and protection values.

The situation today is far removed from that which we faced just four or five years ago. Developments have been rapid. Although there is still work to be done, we have come a long way.