Course development
On this page, the course coordinator or examiner will publish course analyses with course data for a course offering. When the course analysis has been published, the course data, the course memo, and the course syllabus are displayed. All course syllabuses and course memos are shown on the page Archive.
The information can help prospective, current, and former students with course selection, or to follow up on their own participation. Teachers, course coordinators, examiners, etc. can use the page as support in course development.
2024
When the course analysis has been published, the course data, course memo and course syllabus are displayed.
2023
DSPHT23 ( Start date 28 Aug 2023, English )
Course syllabus DD2430 ( Autumn 2021 - )Course memo DD2430 Autumn 2023-50418Course analysis: 8 Apr 2024Coordinator | Examiners | Students | Examination | Result | Changes of the course before this course offering |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Danica Kragic Jensfelt | Danica Kragic Jensfelt | 50 | PRO1 (3.5) P, F PRO2 (4.0) P, F | 100 % | Kursen fortsatte i nästan samma format som året innan. Studenterna jobbade i grupper av 4 på projekt som definierades av företag eller forskargrupper. En halvtidsutvärdering gjordes på alla projekt i mitten av kursen. Studenterna jobbade på bra men det fanns olika typer av utmaningar när det gäller infrastruktur och tillgång till beräkningskraft. Grupperna visade stor intresse för att hitta lösningar till komplexa problem samt spenderade rätt så mycket tid på att få samarbetet och fördelningen av jobbet inom grupperna rättvis. Förändringarna som gjordes var nya typer av projekt och mer handledning av grupperna med hjälp av postdoktorer. |
Course data has been registered manually
Additional data about the course analysis
The course analysis applies to following course offerings
Compulsory within programme
Published first time
8 Apr 2024
Last time changed
No changes since first published.
2022
DSPHT22 ( Start date 29/08/2022, English )
Course syllabus DD2430 ( Autumn 2021 - )No course memo addedCourse analysis: 19 Jan 2023Coordinator | Examiners | Students | Examination | Result | Changes of the course before this course offering |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Danica Kragic Jensfelt | Danica Kragic Jensfelt | 61 | PRO1 (3.5) P, F PRO2 (4.0) P, F | 100 % | All project topics were completely new. We also had new companies such as Ericsson joining. There was more focus on helping students to plan their time and also support on how to write project reports and prepare for the oral evaluation. They kept weekly calendars on who-did-what and needed to append that to the report at the end. More time was given to the oral examination and there was a higher requirement on discussing the progress with the opposing group. |
Course data has been registered manually
Additional data about the course analysis
The course analysis applies to following course offerings
Compulsory within programme
Published first time
19 Jan 2023
Last time changed
No changes since first published.
2021
DSPHT21 ( Start date 30/08/2021, English )
Course syllabus DD2430 ( Autumn 2021 - )No course memo addedCourse analysis: 7 Sept 2022Coordinator | Examiners | Students | Examination | Result | Changes of the course before this course offering |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Danica Kragic Jensfelt | Danica Kragic Jensfelt | 78 | PRO1 (3.5) P, F PRO2 (4.0) P, F | 98 % * | This year we have had more examples from companies and students needed to work more closely with the opposing group. We also introduced the halv-time evaluation and consultancy hours. |
Course data has been registered manually
Additional data about the course analysis
The course analysis applies to following course offerings
Compulsory within programme
Published first time
7 Sept 2022
Last time changed
No changes since first published.
2020
DSProj20 ( Start date 24/08/2020, English )
Course syllabus DD2430 ( Spring 2019 - Spring 2021 )No course memo addedCourse analysis: 7 Sept 2022Coordinator | Examiners | Students | Examination | Result | Changes of the course before this course offering |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Danica Kragic Jensfelt | Danica Kragic Jensfelt | 86 | PRO1 (3.5) P, F PRO2 (4.0) P, F | 98.8 % | New companies and supervisors for the projects were introduced and more time was spent on giving report feedback. |
Course data has been registered manually
Additional data about the course analysis
The course analysis applies to following course offerings
Compulsory within programme
Published first time
7 Sept 2022
Last time changed
No changes since first published.
2019
Autumn 2019-1 ( Start date 26/08/2019, English )
Course syllabus DD2430 ( Spring 2019 - Spring 2021 )No course memo addedCourse analysis: 7 Sept 2022Coordinator | Examiners | Students | Examination | Result | Changes of the course before this course offering |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Danica Kragic Jensfelt | Danica Kragic Jensfelt | 77 | PRO1 (3.5) P, F PRO2 (4.0) P, F | 97.4 % | New project topics and supervisors have been included in the course. More time spent on supervision |
Course data has been registered manually
Additional data about the course analysis
The course analysis applies to following course offerings
Compulsory within programme
Published first time
7 Sept 2022
Last time changed
No changes since first published.
2018
DSProjHT18 ( Start date 27/08/2018, English )
Course syllabus DD2430 ( Autumn 2018 - Autumn 2018 )No course memo addedCourse analysis: 3 Oct 2019Coordinator | Examiners | Students | Examination | Result | Changes of the course before this course offering |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Danica Kragic Jensfelt | Danica Kragic Jensfelt | 40 * | PRO1 (3.5) P, F PRO2 (4.0) P, F | 0.9 % * | This course was given for the first time in 2018. The graduation rate should be 90% and not 0.9%. |
Course data has been registered manually
Additional data about the course analysis
The course analysis applies to following course offerings
Compulsory within programme
Published first time
3 Oct 2019
Last time changed
3 Oct 2019
Comments to changes in course data or course analysis after publishing
The graduation rate should be 90% and not 0.9%.