The course is a seminar course where you as a participant contribute with the main content. Each participant contribute with one ground improvement method. The main work take place individually between the seminars. Each participant writes a report of 30-50 pages. The reports are put together and published as course literature. The reports consider theory/praxis, execution methods/equipments, advantages/disadvantages/economy, quality assessment and quality control. The examination consists of the report and written reviews of two other reports. The works are presented orally at a final seminar.
F1B5422 Geotechnology 7.5 credits
This course has been discontinued.
Last planned examination: Autumn 2022
Decision to discontinue this course:
No information insertedInformation per course offering
Course offerings are missing for current or upcoming semesters.
Course syllabus as PDF
Please note: all information from the Course syllabus is available on this page in an accessible format.
Course syllabus F1B5422 (Autumn 2009–)Information for research students about course offerings
The course will be given when asked for. Contact the contact person.
Content and learning outcomes
Course contents
Intended learning outcomes
The course shall give you an overall picture and deeper knowledge of different ground improvement methods. The course consider dimensioning principles, design, execution and quality control. After the course you shall be able to establish proposals for ground improvement for different conditions.
After the course you shall be able, within a limited time, to take a subject, find the most relevant and current literature and present it in a well written report. The written reports in the course shall be used in graduate studies in geotechnical engineering.
Literature and preparations
Specific prerequisites
Master of Science in Engineering or similar with an undergraduate course in geotechnical and foundation engineering.
Recommended prerequisites
Equipment
Literature
We don't use any special course literature. The course literature consist of the materials you find in your own literature survey. Examples are handbooks, design guides, state-of-art reports and scientific papers.
Examination and completion
If the course is discontinued, students may request to be examined during the following two academic years.
Grading scale
Examination
Based on recommendation from KTH’s coordinator for disabilities, the examiner will decide how to adapt an examination for students with documented disability.
The examiner may apply another examination format when re-examining individual students.
- Active participation at the seminars
- Writing a report and oral presentation of a ground improvement method
- Written review of two others reports, methods
Opportunity to complete the requirements via supplementary examination
Opportunity to raise an approved grade via renewed examination
Examiner
Ethical approach
- All members of a group are responsible for the group's work.
- In any assessment, every student shall honestly disclose any help received and sources used.
- In an oral assessment, every student shall be able to present and answer questions about the entire assignment and solution.