FHN3015 Involving old people in engineering and design 7.5 credits
The purpose is to provide doctoral students with knowledge of different scientific perspectives on technological development for older people and the opportunity to critically reflect on what can be effective, meaningful and sustainable for modern ageing.
Information for research students about course offerings
Planned to be given in P3 2021.
Min/max 5/10 particpants
Contact the examiner for information.
Choose semester and course offering
Choose semester and course offering to see information from the correct course syllabus and course offering.
Content and learning outcomes
Course contents
- Why old people must be involved in technology and design - demographic challenges
- Methods and approaches for involving old people in technology and design
- The benefits of involving older people in research
Intended learning outcomes
After completing the course, the doctoral student must have
- Acquired knowledge of technical and social science perspectives on the issue of technological development for older people.
- Ability to critically evaluate how older people's life experiences can be an asset in innovation processes.
- Reflected on an ethically and socially sustainable implementation of technology in the lives of older people.
Course disposition
The course is offered through the zoom. Most consist of self-study, but opportunities for individual tutoring are associated with the coursework.
The course covers seven weeks of work corresponding to 200 hours and consists of three parts:
The first part involves literature studies in preparation for a digital four hour seminar. Course participants will read selected parts according to the course coordinators recommendation from the reference list below. Some further inspirational publications may occur.
The second part consists of a digital four hour seminar. The first part of this seminar include a lecture on why old people should be involved in technology and design and whether it makes a difference to involve old people in the development and design of technology. The second part is a design workshop in which the participants will try out product development and design for older users.
The third part consists of a mandatory and individual assignment corresponding to eight weeks of half-time studies on the theme: The benefit of involving older people in research and design. The course participants will relate the course content to their own thesis work and write a scientific text that can be published in a scientific journal or be part of the outline. The result will be presented at a digital seminar. The course participants will also make comments on each other's work.
Literature and preparations
Specific prerequisites
Eligible for studies at the third-cycle level.
Recommended prerequisites
No information inserted
Equipment
Digital platform for reading articles and writing texts.
Contact the examiner / course coordinator for information.
Literature
Coleman, R., Lebbon, C., Clarkson, J. & Keates, S. (2003) From margins to mainstream. In Coleman et al: Inclusive Design. Design for the Whole Population. Springer, page 1-25.
Essén A & Östlund, B. Laggards as Innovators? Old Users as Designers of New Services & Service Systems. International Journal of Design 2011, Vol. 5 No. 3, pp. 89-98.
Oudshoorn, N. & Pinch, T. (eds.) 2003, How Users Matter, The Co-construction of Users and Technology, Cambridge, MA, US. Recommended readings are the Introduction chapter and chapter 3.
Peine, A., Rollwagen, I, & Neven, L. The rise of the “innosumer” – Rethinking older technology users. Technological Forecasting & Social Change 82 (2014) 199–214
Tillkommer förslag på bokkapitel som publiceras 2021.
Examination and completion
If the course is discontinued, students may request to be examined during the following two academic years.
Grading scale
P, F
Examination
- HEM1 - Home assignment, 1.5 credits, grading scale: P, F
- SEM1 - Seminar, 1.5 credits, grading scale: P, F
- UPP1 - Written report, 4.5 credits, grading scale: P, F
Based on recommendation from KTH’s coordinator for disabilities, the examiner will decide how to adapt an examination for students with documented disability.
The examiner may apply another examination format when re-examining individual students.
A passed course gives 7.5 credits and contains active participation in prepared seminars and a written essay. Participation in seminars is mandatory and must be at least 80% for approved.
Other requirements for final grade
Presentation of an individual written assignment related to the students' own dissertation and comment on another participant's written assignment.
Opportunity to complete the requirements via supplementary examination
No information inserted
Opportunity to raise an approved grade via renewed examination
No information inserted
Examiner
Ethical approach
- All members of a group are responsible for the group's work.
- In any assessment, every student shall honestly disclose any help received and sources used.
- In an oral assessment, every student shall be able to present and answer questions about the entire assignment and solution.
Further information
Course web
Further information about the course can be found on the Course web at the link below. Information on the Course web will later be moved to this site.
Course web FHN3015Offered by
Main field of study
This course does not belong to any Main field of study.
Education cycle
Third cycle
Add-on studies
No information inserted
Contact
Professor Britt Östlund
Supplementary information
The course is conducted in English. Course literature is in English.
Is given on-line spring 2021.