Skip to main content

HS202X Degree Project in Architectural Lighting Design and Health, Second Cycle 30.0 credits

Choose semester and course offering

Choose semester and course offering to see information from the correct course syllabus and course offering.

Headings with content from the Course syllabus HS202X (Autumn 2010–) are denoted with an asterisk ( )

Content and learning outcomes

Course contents

  • Methodology and structure.
  • Supervised process development.
  • Specific content will be determined by the student in consultation with supervisors.
  • The project maybe either fully scientific or a practical application with complementary theoretical part.
  • Tutor maybe internal or external and will be agreed with the Course Director.

Intended learning outcomes

  • Students must prove the competence and knowledge for the development of a degree project in the field of "architectural lighting design and health".
  • Students have to show the capacity of structuring a problem and defining a method for the work process.
  • Students must adopt relevant standpoints in the conclusion of the paper.

Course disposition

Content’s structure:

Academic process  3 cr.

(Methods, structure, development)

Degree Project  27 cr.

Literature and preparations

Specific prerequisites

Completed courses 1 to 8 within the programme.

Recommended prerequisites

No information inserted


No information inserted


To be selected by the student with support of tutor and supervisor.

Examination and completion

If the course is discontinued, students may request to be examined during the following two academic years.

Grading scale

A, B, C, D, E, FX, F


  • XUP1 - Methods, 3.0 credits, grading scale: P, F
  • XUP2 - Examination Question, 27.0 credits, grading scale: P, F

Based on recommendation from KTH’s coordinator for disabilities, the examiner will decide how to adapt an examination for students with documented disability.

The examiner may apply another examination format when re-examining individual students.

Evaluation of written paper and oral presentation, in seminar where examiner will criticize the thesis. The student has to reply and prove thesis reliability.

Opportunity to complete the requirements via supplementary examination

No information inserted

Opportunity to raise an approved grade via renewed examination

No information inserted


Profile picture Per Fransson

Ethical approach

  • All members of a group are responsible for the group's work.
  • In any assessment, every student shall honestly disclose any help received and sources used.
  • In an oral assessment, every student shall be able to present and answer questions about the entire assignment and solution.

Further information

Course web

Further information about the course can be found on the Course web at the link below. Information on the Course web will later be moved to this site.

Course web HS202X

Offered by

ABE/Lighting Design

Main field of study

Architecture, Built Environment

Education cycle

Second cycle

Add-on studies

No information inserted


Isabel Dominguez (