IV1300 Software Engineering 7.5 credits
This course has been discontinued.
Last planned examination: Spring 2022
Decision to discontinue this course:
No information insertedContent and learning outcomes
Course contents
To successfully plan and lead a non-trivial software project, it is important to possess knowledge of all project activities in a software project. The course focuses on teaching activities such as project planning and management, quality assurance, version management, basic cost and time estimation, basic software metrics, making and analysing requirements specifications and basic validation and verification of software.
After the course, the student will have:
- participated actively in discussions during lectures and seminars.
- participated actively in a software project using a combination of plan-driven techniques and agile ones.
Intended learning outcomes
The purpose of software engineering is to enable repetitively successful software development, that is software projects where the software is developed according to its specification and within given time and budget boundaries. In a world of increasing complexity and growing demands on flexibility it is necessary to combine software engineering principles with agile methods like test-driven development and customer on site.
Having successfully completed the course, the student should be able to:
- describe the difference between plan-driven and agile processes and motivate the description.
- account for what is significant for a software engineering approach to software development and the principles behind it.
- account for what is significant for a plan-driven approach to software development and the principles behind it.
- account for what is significant for an agile approach to software development and the principles behind it.
- describe the agile methods of Scrum and XP.
- describe several techniques (both classical software engineering ones and agile ones) for:
- requirements elicitation and requirement management
- resource planning
- risk analysis and risk management
- test planning
- version management
- time and cost estimations - make judgements about applicability of a these techniques in some known project, possibly combining plan-driven techniques with agile ones.
- decide and motivate why some technique is suitable for use in a plan driven software project.
- decide and motivate why some technique is suitable for use in an agile software project.
- find suitable software engineering methods for his or her work in future projects.
- easily adapt to work processes using software engineering techniques.
- evaluate projects and analyse what caused successes and failures for use in future projects.
Literature and preparations
Specific prerequisites
- Completed upper secondary education including documented proficiency in Swedish corresponding to Swedish B and English corresponding to English A. For students who received/will receive their final school grades after 31 December 2009, there is an additional entry requirement for mathematics as follows: documented proficiency in mathematics corresponding to Mathematics A. And the specific requirements of mathematics, physics and chemistry corresponding to Mathematics D, Physics B and Chemistry A.
- Good knowledge in programming.
Recommended prerequisites
Good knowledge in programming
Equipment
Literature
- Ian Sommerville:
Software Engineering, 9ISBN-10: 0137035152
ISBN-13: 9780137035151Publisher: Addison-WesleyAlistair
-
(Cockburn: Agile Software Development, Addison-Wesley, 0-321-48275-1)
Examination and completion
If the course is discontinued, students may request to be examined during the following two academic years.
Grading scale
Examination
- PRO1 - Project, 4.5 credits, grading scale: P, F
- TEN1 - Examination, 3.0 credits, grading scale: A, B, C, D, E, FX, F
Based on recommendation from KTH’s coordinator for disabilities, the examiner will decide how to adapt an examination for students with documented disability.
The examiner may apply another examination format when re-examining individual students.
Opportunity to complete the requirements via supplementary examination
Opportunity to raise an approved grade via renewed examination
Examiner
Ethical approach
- All members of a group are responsible for the group's work.
- In any assessment, every student shall honestly disclose any help received and sources used.
- In an oral assessment, every student shall be able to present and answer questions about the entire assignment and solution.
Further information
Course room in Canvas
Offered by
Main field of study
Education cycle
Add-on studies
Supplementary information
Older course information, until fall 2010:
http://people.dsv.su.se/~beatrice/IV1300/