MF1048 Introduction to Technology for Technology Teachers 17.0 credits
This course has been discontinued.
Last planned examination: Autumn 2021
Decision to discontinue this course:
No information insertedContent and learning outcomes
Course contents
Intended learning outcomes
Literature and preparations
Specific prerequisites
Recommended prerequisites
Equipment
Literature
Apazidis, Nicholas (2004). Mekanik. Lund: Studentlitteratur
Boylestad, Robert L. (2010). Introductory circuit analysis (12:e upplagan). Upper Saddle River, New
Jersey, USA: Prentice Hall
Ginner, Thomas & Mattsson, Gunilla (1996). Teknik i skolan. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
Gyberg, Per & Hallström, Jonas (red.)(2009). Världens gång – teknikens utveckling. Lund:Studentlitteratur.
Sundin, Bo (2006). Den kupade handen. Stockholm: Carlssons bokförlag.
Vries, Marc de (2005). Teaching about technology. Dordrecht, Nederländerna: Springer.
Folkeson, A. (2003), Kommunikation för ingenjörer. Maskinkonstruktion, KTH, 2003
Kursmaterial som omfattar bland annat skissteknik, CAD, arbetsmetodik i produktframtagning.
Dessutom tillkommer undervisningsmaterial i elektroteknik.
Examination and completion
If the course is discontinued, students may request to be examined during the following two academic years.
Grading scale
Examination
- INL1 - Written Assignments, 3.0 credits, grading scale: A, B, C, D, E, FX, F
- INL2 - Written Assignment, 1.0 credits, grading scale: P, F
- INL3 - Hand in Assignment in design, 1.5 credits, grading scale: P, F
- LAB2 - Laboratory Sessions, 2.0 credits, grading scale: P, F
- LAB3 - Laboratory Sessions in CAD, 1.5 credits, grading scale: P, F
- PRO1 - Project Work in Design and Product Realization, 3.0 credits, grading scale: A, B, C, D, E, FX, F
- TEN2 - Examination, 3.0 credits, grading scale: A, B, C, D, E, FX, F
- VFU2 - Placement, 2.0 credits, grading scale: P, F
Based on recommendation from KTH’s coordinator for disabilities, the examiner will decide how to adapt an examination for students with documented disability.
The examiner may apply another examination format when re-examining individual students.
Opportunity to complete the requirements via supplementary examination
Opportunity to raise an approved grade via renewed examination
Examiner
Ethical approach
- All members of a group are responsible for the group's work.
- In any assessment, every student shall honestly disclose any help received and sources used.
- In an oral assessment, every student shall be able to present and answer questions about the entire assignment and solution.