Skip to main content
Till KTH:s startsida

MJ2674 Scenario Methods 6.0 credits

Administer About course

Information per course offering

Course offerings are missing for current or upcoming semesters.

Course syllabus as PDF

Please note: all information from the Course syllabus is available on this page in an accessible format.

Course syllabus MJ2674 (Autumn 2009–)
Headings with content from the Course syllabus MJ2674 (Autumn 2009–) are denoted with an asterisk ( )

Content and learning outcomes

Course contents

The state of the art in scenario methods
The difference between descriptive, normative, quantitative and qualitative scenarios
The principle of scenario based planningExperiences from carried case studies using fore- and backcasting methods
Scenario methodology and conflict resolution management
The case study with a selected scenario method

Intended learning outcomes

After you have passed the course you should be able to:

  • Describe and explain different scenario methods.
  • Assess and explain how scenario methods can be utilized to facilitate planning and conflict management in decision making processes.
  • Assess in a group a problem, choose appropriate methodology and develop a scenario.
  • Specify and describe how carried out scenarios can be qualitatively assess.

Literature and preparations

Specific prerequisites

At least 150 academic credits (ECTS) in a program of engineering, or natural science.

Literature

Papers published in scientific reports and journals.

Examination and completion

Grading scale

A, B, C, D, E, FX, F

Examination

  • PRO1 - Project, 4.5 credits, grading scale: A, B, C, D, E, FX, F
  • UPP2 - Home Assignment, 1.5 credits, grading scale: A, B, C, D, E, FX, F

Based on recommendation from KTH’s coordinator for disabilities, the examiner will decide how to adapt an examination for students with documented disability.

The examiner may apply another examination format when re-examining individual students.

If the course is discontinued, students may request to be examined during the following two academic years.

Examiner

No information inserted

Ethical approach

  • All members of a group are responsible for the group's work.
  • In any assessment, every student shall honestly disclose any help received and sources used.
  • In an oral assessment, every student shall be able to present and answer questions about the entire assignment and solution.

Further information

Course room in Canvas

Registered students find further information about the implementation of the course in the course room in Canvas. A link to the course room can be found under the tab Studies in the Personal menu at the start of the course.

Offered by

ABE/Sustainability and Environmental Engineering

Education cycle

Second cycle