AK2210 Political Ecology 7.5 credits

The course explores the interdisciplinary field of political ecology with a special focus on its historical dimension. Political ecology is a theoretical and methodological approach to the study of socio-ekological systems. It focuses on conflicts, power relations and uneven distribution of environmental costs and benefits. The field seeks to "politicise" debates about environmental problems, and thereby stands in contrast to �a-political� ecologies that tries to understand environmental issues in terms of universal driving forces related to, for example, population trends or biophysical factors.

The course intends to familiarise you with central concepts and tools used by political ecologists and thereby help you to take an active role in the political-ecological field if you wish. Unlike other sciences that you may be familiar with so far, political ecology does not work with experiments, modelling or quantitative analysis; instead, the course takes as its point of departure theoretical concepts that are documented through case studies which combine qualitative and quantitative information in an empirically-backed narrative ("story"). Each course occasion will focus on different key concept from political-ecological theory and use an important, published case study to illustrate how this concept is "put to work".

On completion of the course, you should be able to

• describe the present-day ecological crisis in the world from multiple perspectives: political-economic, cultural and epistemological

• analyse the historical processes that have led to the current crisis and how different social groups have been influenced by environmental problems in different geohistorical contexts;

• develop new and imaginative ways to conceptualize natur-society relationships in different geopolitical, historical and cultural contexts in order to contribute to the design of a more inclusive and socially just environmental policy.

120 credits of university studies in technology, natural sciences, humanities or social sciences as well as knowledge of English corresponding to English B / English 6

If the course is discontinued, students may request to be examined during the following two academic years.

• INL1 - Essay, 5.0 credits, grading scale: A, B, C, D, E, FX, F
• PRO1 - Group project, 2.5 credits, grading scale: A, B, C, D, E, FX, F

Based on recommendation from KTH’s coordinator for disabilities, the examiner will decide how to adapt an examination for students with documented disability.

The examiner may apply another examination format when re-examining individual students.

The examination is based on written reflections/comments (about 350 words in length) before each seminar, a group project and an individual essay.

In the group project, 2-3 students work together on an analysis of an environmental conflict. At the end of the course, the project is presented to the class. The presentations should not be longer than 10 minutes and all group members are expected to participate. The project should focus on an environmental conflict of interest and present basic data about the conflict (geography, history, social and environmental impacts, etc), the main actors in the conflict, their interests, values and �language� (narratives about the conflict) and describe the institutional and social arenas through which the conflict is mediated. A good project uses one of the main concepts in political ecology that has been presented in the course to explain the conflict and challenge the most common conceptions of it.

The individual essay should target a topic with close connections to the course contents.

The weekly comment/reflection is not graded, but half a grading step will be subtracted from the final grade for each comment that is not submitted in time (if you, for example, miss to deliver two comments in time during the course your highest possible final grade will be reduced from A to B). Exemptions apply in exceptional cases (e.g. serious illness) and with prior information to and consent of the course coordinator.

Completed group project, completed essay and completed written reflections/comments

Robert Gioielli

• All members of a group are responsible for the group's work.
• In any assessment, every student shall honestly disclose any help received and sources used.
• In an oral assessment, every student shall be able to present and answer questions about the entire assignment and solution.