Skip to main content

EH2781 IT Management with Enterprise Architecture II, Case Studies 15.0 credits

In this course, an approach to enterprise information systems management that relies on models of information systems and their environment, called Enterprise Architecture (EA), is presented. The idea is the same as for Computer-Aided Design (CAD) systems in mechanical engineering: virtual models of the system are used in the design phase instead of real prototypes. Virtual cars can be crash tested at low cost, virtual bridges can be analyzed for their structural stability, virtual homes can be used for calculating the optimal placement of radiators and to study whether the dishwasher will fit in the kitchen. Similarly, models of enterprise information systems can be used to rapidly and cheaply understand the effects of design changes. How will a certain change to the system affect information security, service availability, application modifiability, or system cost?

In the course, the students will learn how to rationally determine what actions to take with respect to information systems in order to support the goals of the user organization. Examples of goals that often are important to user organizations are system qualities such as the availability of the system (e.g. measured in uptime), the cost of the system (e.g. measured in €), the fit between functions and functional requirements, the quality of the processed data, the modifiability of the system, etc.

The course is project-based, meaning that all theories and methods will be used in a real-life case at a Swedish company. The case study companies range from energy companies to production companies to banks and insurance companies. Each project group will be assigned a company and a case at the beginning of the course, including an industrial tutor. The main outcome and examination of the course is a case study report.

Course offerings are missing for current or upcoming semesters.
Headings with content from the Course syllabus EH2781 (Spring 2019–) are denoted with an asterisk ( )

Content and learning outcomes

Course contents

The course consists of a set of activities for you to engage in. They are divided into an introductory assignment, a metamodeling assignment, and the case study.

Introductory assignment

This part will support you in producing a Case study motivation report. Three topics will be discussed.

Enterprise Information Systems: To convince your case study contacts of the benefits of the study, it is important to first understand the basic structure and management of their enterprise information systems.

Enterprise Architecture: Since your recommendations to the company will be based on an enterprise architecture approach, you will need to have some background on this discipline.

Enterprise Architecture for decision-making: You will provide a recommendation for a decision that the case study organization can choose to implement. To convince the organization that your approach is suitable as decision-making support, you must be able to explain plainly how your use of enterprise architecture will lead to good recommendations.

Metamodeling Assignment

In the metamodeling assignment, a chosen metamodel should not be taken for granted. Instead, the main task is to improve on it in order to make recommendations more tailored to the case study company.

Augment a metamodel with a system quality of importance for the owner organization: The most common metamodels usually only contains analyses of a certain number of quality attributes including modifiability, availability, interoperability, cost, etc. However, the case study organization may also be interested in other quality attributes, such as security, performance, organizational efficiency, or perhaps business profitability. To prevent that your recommendations are limited by the scope of the chosen metamodel, this task aims to extend it to include one or more other attributes.

The Case Study

The goal of the case study is to provide recommendations to the studied organization on future enterprise system evolution based on the metamodel developed (assessment framework).

Model the system: In order to predict system qualities, the proper information needs to be collected. Modeling languages are well suited to codify the required data. The goal of this step is to model the case study system. In order to accomplish the task, you need to understand the modeling language, establish contact with your designated case study organization, conduct interviews, collect and study system and business documents, and finally do the actual modeling.

Each student group is assigned a case study at the start of the course. Each group is also assigned an academic case study supervisor.

Model future candidate enterprise system scenarios: In order to recommend future developments of the system to the user organization, a set of future candidate enterprise system scenarios need to be proposed. These scenarios can either be proposed by people from the user organization or can be created by the student group.

Model the user organization’s requirements: To determine which scenario is the better, the user organization’s requirements need to be taken into account. Is Service A more important than Service B? Is Modifiability more important than Availability for Service A? What availability is minimally acceptable for Business process C? These and similar requirements can be captured using the provided metamodel.

Predict scenario quality: By using an EA tool and the improved metamodel the scenarios should be evaluated. Perhaps it is possible for you, after the analysis, to modify one of the scenarios in a realistic way to increase its utility to the user organization. If you can, make sure to improve the scenarios in this manner.

Justify your recommendations: Your recommendation ought to be the candidate scenario that results in the highest utility score for the user organization. The user organization will, however, need to understand how you came to that conclusion. Therefore, you will need to motivate your recommendations to a layperson. Why is Scenario A better than B? Why did Scenario C have a lower modifiability than Scenario B? Why should we trust your estimation of the investment cost of Node X? Why is Y modeled as a service and not a function and how does that affect your prediction?

Intended learning outcomes

At the start of the course, students will form small groups of two to four persons. Each group will be assigned one or several information systems in operational use at some organization, such as an energy company, a product-developing company, or an insurance company. The main concrete result expected of the students is a set of recommendations regarding the future evolution of the information systems and their enterprise environment. The recommendations will be presented to the owner organization, which might choose to implement them.

In order to generate the system development recommendations, students are expected to employ the enterprise architecture methods and tools provided in the course. The goal of the course can be summarized in the following two learning objectives:

  • What are the factors that affect various quality properties of information systems, and through what mechanisms do they act?
  • How can enterprise architecture modeling and analysis be employed to predict the effects of changes to the factors on the qualities?

The involvement with a company has on many occasions resulted in master thesis projects and is a good introduction to the job market. Our previous students now typically work as management consultants at firms like Capgemini, Centigo and Accenture, as IT specialists at companies such as Ericsson, ABB, Vattenfall, IBM and Microsoft, or continue their studies as PhD students within Enterprise Architecture at Industrial Information and Control Systems.

Literature and preparations

Specific prerequisites

Single course students: 120hp and English B or equivalent.

Recommended prerequisites

Recommended but not obligatory:

EH2770 IT-management med Enterprise Architecture I


Required equipment - A computer with Windows or Mac operating system with rights to install software.


The exact literature will be presented at the start of the course each year.

Examination and completion

If the course is discontinued, students may request to be examined during the following two academic years.

Grading scale

A, B, C, D, E, FX, F


  • PRO1 - Project Plan, 2.0 credits, grading scale: P, F
  • PRO2 - Investigation Report, 4.0 credits, grading scale: A, B, C, D, E, FX, F
  • PRO3 - Final Report, 7.0 credits, grading scale: A, B, C, D, E, FX, F
  • SEM1 - Seminar Series, 2.0 credits, grading scale: P, F

Based on recommendation from KTH’s coordinator for disabilities, the examiner will decide how to adapt an examination for students with documented disability.

The examiner may apply another examination format when re-examining individual students.

In order for the course’s pedagogical stance to work, the examination must be well aligned with the learning goals. The grade will be based on reports written by you in order to convince the case study organization of your study’s results. The first report is written early and aims to convince the case study organization of the benefits of the study to be conducted. What’s in it for them? The second report presents the enhanced metamodel that will be used in the case study. And the final report presents your recommendations and aims to convince the case study organization of the credibility of those results. Why should they follow your proposals?

As a part of the examination, both of the aforementioned reports are presented before the class. These presentations are compulsory and may influence your grade. For each of the three reports, you are also obliged to read the report of one of the other groups in the class. During their presentation, you are expected to act as the opponent.

Other requirements for final grade

Approved reports and presentations.

Opportunity to complete the requirements via supplementary examination

No information inserted

Opportunity to raise an approved grade via renewed examination

No information inserted


Ethical approach

  • All members of a group are responsible for the group's work.
  • In any assessment, every student shall honestly disclose any help received and sources used.
  • In an oral assessment, every student shall be able to present and answer questions about the entire assignment and solution.

Further information

Course room in Canvas

Registered students find further information about the implementation of the course in the course room in Canvas. A link to the course room can be found under the tab Studies in the Personal menu at the start of the course.

Offered by

Main field of study

Electrical Engineering

Education cycle

Second cycle

Add-on studies

Master thesis project

Supplementary information

Replaces EH2780 IT Management with Enterprise Architecture II, Case Studies, which in turn replaced EH2040 Industrial Information Systems, Systems Engineering and EH2050 Industrial Information Systems, Case Studies