HN204X Degree Project in Ergonomics, Second Cycle 15.0 credits
Content and learning outcomes
Course contents
The degree project should constitute part of a specialised study in the main field at second cycle level to satisfy the requirements for the degree of master of science (60 credits). This implies that the degree project should be carried out in the main field of study. The degree project can be carried out in KTH or externally. The student is supervised during the period of study by supervisors both at KTH and at the company.
Intended learning outcomes
After passing the course, the student should:
- be able to apply relevant knowledge and skills that have been acquired in the main field of study on a given problem
- within given frames, also with limited information, be able to independently analyse and discuss complex issues as well as handle larger problems at second cycle level in the main field of study
- demonstrate the ability to reflect upon, evaluate and critically review own scientific results and those of others'
- be able to document and present own work with a high level of requirements for structure, formalities and language
- demonstrate the ability to identify own need for additional knowledge and take responsibility for the development of own knowledge
Literature and preparations
Specific prerequisites
A minimum of 30 credits must have been completed through the one year KTH master´s programme "Ergonomics and Human-Technology-Organisation", of which 15 credits should be within the main field of study at advanced level.
Recommended prerequisites
Equipment
Literature
An independent literature search and study within the relevant field is expected.
Additional reading may be suggested by the examiner or supervisor.
Examination and completion
If the course is discontinued, students may request to be examined during the following two academic years.
Grading scale
Examination
- XUPP - Examination Question, 15.0 credits, grading scale: P, F
Based on recommendation from KTH’s coordinator for disabilities, the examiner will decide how to adapt an examination for students with documented disability.
The examiner may apply another examination format when re-examining individual students.
This take the form planning, and implementation of the work according to that plan, as well as a written report and oral presentation of the work. Grading is on P/F scale (pass-fail)
Opportunity to complete the requirements via supplementary examination
Opportunity to raise an approved grade via renewed examination
Examiner
Ethical approach
- All members of a group are responsible for the group's work.
- In any assessment, every student shall honestly disclose any help received and sources used.
- In an oral assessment, every student shall be able to present and answer questions about the entire assignment and solution.