- Risk paradigms in society
- Methods for qualitative and quantitative risk assessment
- Principles for risk evaluation
- Risk in decision making processes - Processes, methods and tools for conflict resolution
- Risk perception and risk communication
- Project work on an ongoing or potential environmental conflict
MJ2670 Risk Management 6.0 credits
This course has been discontinued.
Decision to discontinue this course:
No information inserted
Information per course offering
Course offerings are missing for current or upcoming semesters.
Course syllabus as PDF
Please note: all information from the Course syllabus is available on this page in an accessible format.
Course syllabus MJ2670 (Autumn 2011–)Content and learning outcomes
Course contents
Intended learning outcomes
After you have passed the course you should be able to:
- Describe and explain the concept of risk from different research paradigms
- Have knowledge about the most common engineering methods for risk assessment
- Describe methods for environmental risks assessment and know the principles for how risks can be evaluated and communicated to different interest groups in decision processes
- Describe and use existing methods and tools for conflict resolution strategies in cases in environmental risk management
- Critically examine how information and knowledge are used by different interest groups in existing environmental conflicts
- Analyze different frames held by stakeholders in an ongoing conflict. This means evaluation of how different people and interest groups develop their views on an environmental conflict
- Be able to outline conflict resolution strategies for chosen environmental conflicts
Literature and preparations
Specific prerequisites
At least 100 academic credits (ECTS) in a program of engineering or natural science including documented profieciency in english B or equivalent. .
Literature
Distributed compendium
Examination and completion
Grading scale
Examination
- PRO1 - Project, 3.0 credits, grading scale: A, B, C, D, E, FX, F
- UPP2 - Assignment, 2.0 credits, grading scale: A, B, C, D, E, FX, F
- NÄR1 - Attendance, 1.0 credits, grading scale: P, F
Based on recommendation from KTH’s coordinator for disabilities, the examiner will decide how to adapt an examination for students with documented disability.
The examiner may apply another examination format when re-examining individual students.
If the course is discontinued, students may request to be examined during the following two academic years.
Examiner
Ethical approach
- All members of a group are responsible for the group's work.
- In any assessment, every student shall honestly disclose any help received and sources used.
- In an oral assessment, every student shall be able to present and answer questions about the entire assignment and solution.