Lectures 20 hours
Exercises 6 hours
Computer labs 6 hours
Project 6 hours
AH2307 Urban Modeling and Decision Support 7.5 credits
Information per course offering
Information for Autumn 2024 Start 28 Oct 2024 programme students
- Course location
KTH Campus
- Duration
- 28 Oct 2024 - 13 Jan 2025
- Periods
- P2 (7.5 hp)
- Pace of study
50%
- Application code
50403
- Form of study
Normal Daytime
- Language of instruction
English
- Course memo
- Course memo is not published
- Number of places
Min: 10
- Target group
Recommended for TTGTM, year 1
Searchable for othr master programs with reference to the eligibility requirements in the course plan.
- Planned modular schedule
- [object Object]
- Schedule
- Part of programme
Master's Programme, Transport and Geoinformation Technology, åk 1, Conditionally Elective
Master's Programme, Transport, Mobility and Innovation, åk 1, Mandatory
Master's Programme, Vehicle Engineering, åk 1, Conditionally Elective
Master's Programme, Vehicle Engineering, åk 2, Conditionally Elective
Contact
Qian Wang qianw@kth.se
Course syllabus as PDF
Please note: all information from the Course syllabus is available on this page in an accessible format.
Course syllabus AH2307 (Autumn 2021–)Content and learning outcomes
Course disposition
Course contents
The main contents are discrete choice theory, the multinomial and nested logit model, network equilibrium and assignment theory for car and public transport, and the development and application of a simple forecast and analysis system.
The contents are presented in lectures and developed into practical skills through computer aided exercises. The project task is undertaken as a laboratory exercise where the student will build a forecasting system using the methods taught in the lectures. The student applies the system to a range of policy issues and writes an individual report of the work.
Intended learning outcomes
After the course you should be able to:
- Describe and critique the application of rational models in decision-making processes
- Apply urban theories to building a simple forecasting system
- Analyze policy changes in the urban system and produce decision support for decision-makers
- Write a report of a simple transport planning study
These overall learning objectives are further qualified as follows. After completed course you should be able to:
- Describe and apply central methodologies: discrete choice theory, the multinomial and nested logit model, network equilibrium and assignment theory for car and public transport (KF2)
- critically, independently and creatively identify, formulate and appraoch relevant and complex societal issues, which include economical, ecological and social sustainability
- use an integrated transport and land use forecasting system to model, simulate, forecast and evaluate societal policies (which includes changes to the transport system or land use system) to address relevant societal issues, including sustainability
- clearly account for and discuss conclusions from an evaluation of a policy proposal including changes to the transport and/or land use system
- plan and implement an assessment (evaluation) of public policies to address societal issues using adequate scientific methods
- ability to identify the need for further knowledge
- critique scientific and methodological approaches used in the project
Literature and preparations
Specific prerequisites
Bachelor's degree or equivalent in civil engineering, geography, technical physics, computer science, statistics, economics, or mathematics. At least 3 credits in each programming, linear algebra, univariate analysis, probability theory and statistics andEng B/6 according to the Swedish upper secondary school system.
Recommended prerequisites
Equipment
Literature
Ortuzar & Willumsen (2001). Modelling Transport. John Wiley & Sons.
Examination and completion
If the course is discontinued, students may request to be examined during the following two academic years.
Grading scale
Examination
- PROA - Project, 4.5 credits, grading scale: P, F
- TEN1 - Examination, 3.0 credits, grading scale: A, B, C, D, E, FX, F
Based on recommendation from KTH’s coordinator for disabilities, the examiner will decide how to adapt an examination for students with documented disability.
The examiner may apply another examination format when re-examining individual students.
Written exam equivalent to 3 credits with grading scale A-F.
Project assignment equivalent to 4,5 credits with grading scale P/F.
Opportunity to complete the requirements via supplementary examination
Opportunity to raise an approved grade via renewed examination
Examiner
Ethical approach
- All members of a group are responsible for the group's work.
- In any assessment, every student shall honestly disclose any help received and sources used.
- In an oral assessment, every student shall be able to present and answer questions about the entire assignment and solution.