Skip to main content

FDH3010 Comparative Genre Analysis 7.5 credits

The purpose of the course is to teach and train students to apply comparative genre analysis as a means for writing reviews of digital media and communication projects, thereby giving them the competence to independently analyse, evaluate, and present quality aspects of existing or emerging communication and media genres.

Course offering missing for current semester as well as for previous and coming semesters
Headings with content from the Course syllabus FDH3010 (Autumn 2011–) are denoted with an asterisk ( )

Content and learning outcomes

Course contents

When registering for the course, students are invited to write a short presentation of their thesis work (abstracts in the making) and describe what kind of ICT or media artefacts (platforms, pieces or programming) they would like to analyse in the course and on what aspects of genre (who, why, what, when, where and how) they would like to concentrate their analysis. Genre analysis has a long history in literature and media studies and is today applied to both digital and non-digital media and communication. The literature, lectures and exercises will cover, among other contributions, the groundbreaking work on genres of organisational communication by JoAnne Yeats and Wanda Orlikowsky, the analysis of communication networks by Manuel Castells, Henry Jennings’ analysis of convergence culture, and Batya Friedman’s work on Value Sensitive Design.

Intended learning outcomes

No information inserted

Course disposition

The course will start with two introductory weeks with two lectures – on genre analysis and pattern languages – a literature seminar, and a method exercise. During the following three weeks a comparative genre analysis is written in projects carried out either by individuals or groups of 2-3 students. The groups will get extensive supervision geared at making each student’s contribution to the written analysis useful in their own thesis work. It is in this light the relevance and quality of each student’s contribution to the analysis will be examined in a final presentation seminar.

Literature and preparations

Specific prerequisites

No information inserted

Recommended prerequisites

No information inserted

Equipment

No information inserted

Literature

No information inserted

Examination and completion

If the course is discontinued, students may request to be examined during the following two academic years.

Grading scale

P, F

Examination

    Based on recommendation from KTH’s coordinator for disabilities, the examiner will decide how to adapt an examination for students with documented disability.

    The examiner may apply another examination format when re-examining individual students.

    Opportunity to complete the requirements via supplementary examination

    No information inserted

    Opportunity to raise an approved grade via renewed examination

    No information inserted

    Examiner

    Profile picture Ann Lantz

    Ethical approach

    • All members of a group are responsible for the group's work.
    • In any assessment, every student shall honestly disclose any help received and sources used.
    • In an oral assessment, every student shall be able to present and answer questions about the entire assignment and solution.

    Further information

    Course web

    No information inserted

    Offered by

    EECS/Media Technology and Interaction Design

    Main field of study

    No information inserted

    Education cycle

    Third cycle

    Add-on studies

    No information inserted

    Postgraduate course

    Postgraduate courses at EECS/Media Technology and Interaction Design