Concepts/tools and non-statistical and statistical improvement methods that are used within deviation handling and improvement work in the industry today
HM1021 Quality Tools for Continual Improvement 7.5 credits
Content and learning outcomes
Course contents
Intended learning outcomes
After passing the course, the student should be able to:
- argue for the importance of permanent improvements
- tackle technical problems in a systematic way
- explain methods and philosophies for improvements and compare their applicability
- choose statistical tools from a given problem profile and plan for implementation, carry out, anlayse and draw conclusions about the results and argue for the choices/conclusions
- communicate and explain statistical tools/results and arguments orally and in writing, in a clear way
Literature and preparations
Specific prerequisites
For students admitted to the TIMAS programme: the course ML1113 or the equivalent.
For all other students: General entry requirements and 5 credits of basic statistics, or the equivalent
Recommended prerequisites
Equipment
Literature
Bergman, B. och Klefsjö, B. (2012). Kvalitet från behov till användning. Femte upplagan., Lund: Studentlitteratur ISBN: 9789144078250
Handouts, artiklar och föreläsningsmaterial
Examination and completion
If the course is discontinued, students may request to be examined during the following two academic years.
Grading scale
Examination
- SEMA - Seminairs, 3.0 credits, grading scale: P, F
- TENA - Written examination, 1.5 credits, grading scale: A, B, C, D, E, FX, F
- ÖVNA - Exercises, 3.0 credits, grading scale: P, F
Based on recommendation from KTH’s coordinator for disabilities, the examiner will decide how to adapt an examination for students with documented disability.
The examiner may apply another examination format when re-examining individual students.
Other requirements for final grade
Approved practical assignments Passed written examination Passed seminars
The final grade is a weighted sum considering the result of the written examination and the performance in the exercises.
Opportunity to complete the requirements via supplementary examination
Opportunity to raise an approved grade via renewed examination
Examiner
Ethical approach
- All members of a group are responsible for the group's work.
- In any assessment, every student shall honestly disclose any help received and sources used.
- In an oral assessment, every student shall be able to present and answer questions about the entire assignment and solution.