Skip to main content
Till KTH:s startsida

LL116U Assessment in Technology in Compulsory School 3.0 credits

Administer About course

Information per course offering

Course offerings are missing for current or upcoming semesters.

Course syllabus as PDF

Please note: all information from the Course syllabus is available on this page in an accessible format.

Course syllabus LL116U (Autumn 2013–)
Headings with content from the Course syllabus LL116U (Autumn 2013–) are denoted with an asterisk ( )

Content and learning outcomes

Course contents

No information inserted

Intended learning outcomes

No information inserted

Literature and preparations

Specific prerequisites

No information inserted

Literature

Hartell, E. (2011). Hur sätter man betyg i teknik? I: Teknikundervisning för framtiden av S. O. Hansson, E. Nordlander & I.-B. Skogh (red.), ss. 75–87. Stockholm: Liber.

Hartell, E. (2012). The inefficient loneliness [utdrag, svensk sammanfattning]. Licentiatuppsats i teknikdidaktik. Stockholm: Kungliga Tekniska högskolan.

Jönsson, A., Ekborg, M., Lindahl, B. & Löfgren, L. (2013). Bedömning i NO. Malmö: Gleerups.

Kimbell, R. (2007). E-assessment in project e-scape. Design and Technology Education 12(2), 66–76.

Lundahl, C. (2011). Bedömning för lärande. Stockholm: Norstedts.

Skolverket (2011a). Läroplan för grundskolan, förskoleklassen och fritidshemmet 2011.

Skolverket (2011b). Kommentarmaterial till kursplanen i teknik.

Skolverket (2011c). Kunskapsbedömning i skolan.

Skolverket (2011d). Allmänna råd för planering och genomförande av undervisningen.

Skolverket (2012). Kommentarmaterial till kunskapskraven i teknik.

Wiliam, D. (2013). Att följa lärande.Lund: Studentlitteratur.

Examination and completion

Grading scale

P, F

Examination

  • SEM1 - Active Participation in Seminars, 2.0 credits, grading scale: P, F
  • INL1 - Written Assignment, 1.0 credits, grading scale: P, F

Based on recommendation from KTH’s coordinator for disabilities, the examiner will decide how to adapt an examination for students with documented disability.

The examiner may apply another examination format when re-examining individual students.

If the course is discontinued, students may request to be examined during the following two academic years.

Examiner

No information inserted

Ethical approach

  • All members of a group are responsible for the group's work.
  • In any assessment, every student shall honestly disclose any help received and sources used.
  • In an oral assessment, every student shall be able to present and answer questions about the entire assignment and solution.

Further information

Course room in Canvas

Registered students find further information about the implementation of the course in the course room in Canvas. A link to the course room can be found under the tab Studies in the Personal menu at the start of the course.

Offered by

ECE/Teacher Education

Main field of study

Technology

Education cycle

First cycle