HEM1 - Exercises, 1.5 credits
Homework, Seminars, and Peer Reviews: The homework assignments and seminar participation are assessed on a Pass/Fail basis. To earn the 1.5 credits, you should attend 9 seminars, submit 9 homework assignments, and complete 2 peer reviews. Peer reviews will not be assessed by the teacher, but they are a compulsory activity to get the E.
What alternative does the student have if they missed one of the activities in HEM1?
- If you missed a seminar and/or homework and/or peer review due to illness or other unavoidable circumstances, you have two makeup seminars (1-4) and (5-9) throughout the course. The makeup seminar for four seminars is four hours, so if you missed, e.g., seminar 1, then you go to group 1, and so on.
- If you missed the homework, you have to come to the makeup seminar. You will be given an assignment to work on and submit before the makeup seminar later in Canvas (P/F). Then the standard HW grade will be updated from F to P. If you missed one of the peer reviews, then you have to present a peer-review presentation in the makeup seminar, and then it will be updated in Canvas as completed.
- If not, and you continue missing one of the HEM1 activities and miss their makeup also, then you will fail the course, and you can cover the shortage in the next year’s course, starting in P1
HEM3 - Essay, 1.5 credits
The essay serves as a bridge between DA2210 and future thesis work. Students analyze a completed bachelor's thesis in computer science from scientific, methodological, statistical, ethical, and philosophical perspectives.
The essay consists of three parts:
- Popular science summary
- Scientific analysis
- Suggestions for improvement and future work
The essay will be assessed on six aspects using the rubric below, with G (0) and VG (1) for each aspect, except that the sixth criterion is N/A for VG. Pass (G) must be achieved for all aspects to get an E. The final grade for HEM3 (A–E) is determined by the total number of aspects assessed as Pass with Distinction (VG): 0 = E, 1 = D, 2 = C, 3 = B, and 4 or 5 = A.
|
Criterion
|
Pass (G)
|
Pass with Distinction (VG)
|
|
Quality of Scientific Reasoning
|
The essay presents logical and relevant arguments. Conclusions are generally supported by appropriate reasoning and evidence.
|
The essay presents well-structured, nuanced, and well-supported arguments. Assumptions and limitations are identified and discussed, and conclusions are convincingly justified.
|
|
Connections to Course Concepts
|
The essay correctly applies the key concepts and theories from the course and relates them appropriately to the topic.
|
The essay demonstrates a confident and integrated use of course concepts and theories. Relationships between concepts are analysed and used to deepen the discussion.
|
|
Critical Analysis
|
The essay identifies and discusses relevant perspectives, strengths, and limitations.
|
The essay provides a thorough and balanced critical analysis. Different perspectives are compared, evaluated, and problematised using well-reasoned arguments.
|
|
Use of Relevant Literature
|
Relevant literature is used appropriately to support the discussion and is cited according to academic conventions.
|
The literature is critically evaluated and effectively integrated into the argumentation. The relevance, strengths, and limitations of the sources are discussed, and multiple perspectives are synthesised.
|
|
Ability to Propose Future Research Directions
|
The essay proposes one or more relevant directions for future research and provides a basic justification for the proposals.
|
The essay proposes well-motivated and original directions for future research. The proposals build on the analysis and demonstrate an understanding of research gaps and methodological challenges.
|
|
Quality of Written Communication
|
The essay is clearly structured, written in clear and grammatically correct English, and follows academic conventions for style, terminology, citations, and references.
|
(not applicable)
|
If 1-3 aspects are failed, the grade will be Fx. It is then possible to submit an updated version of the essay within 3 weeks, and if the updated version meets the criteria, the grade E will be awarded.
What alternative does the student have if they missed the Essay?
If you missed or failed the Essay. Then you have to submit it during the period of re-examination from March 30th to April 2nd, 2027.
QUI1 - Digital quizzes, 3.0 credits
The examination consists of:
- Five online quizzes/miniexams in Canvas during the course for grade E.
- Each quiz lasts for 30 minutes ( Funka: 40 min)
- Passing all quizzes is sufficient for Exam grade E.
- This grade can be raised to D or C in the C exam.
This exam is not mandatory, but it is necessary if you would like to raise your course grade.
- Students with a grade of C on the C exam can choose to take an oral exam in January with the teacher Johan Karlander to possibly raise the grade to B or A. The oral exam is a short exam and is based on a discussion of a single exam question that is revealed to the student 20 minutes before for preparation.
The examination assesses understanding of: philosophy of science, scientific reasoning, statistics, ethics, and research methodology. The quiz assignments assess the student's ability to explain, apply, and analyse scientific theories, methods, and ethical issues. The C exam and oral exam assignments assess the student's ability to compare, critically evaluate, and justify scientific theories, methods, and ethical reasoning. The C exam is an open-book exam, and the oral exam is a closed-book exam. The following intended learning outcomes are assessed in QUI1. The criteria used for the assessment in the quizzes and C exam/oral exam are also shown.
|
Intended learning outcomes
|
Quiz 1-5 criteria
|
C exam/oral exam criteria
|
|
Explain and analyse scientific theories relevant to research in computer science
|
Correctly explains relevant scientific theories and analyses their application to research problems in computer science.
|
Critically compares and evaluates relevant scientific theories and justifies their applicability in different research contexts.
|
|
Explain and analyse scientific methods relevant to research in computer science
|
Correctly explains relevant scientific methods and analyses their suitability for addressing research questions in computer science.
|
Critically compares and evaluates scientific methods, discussing their strengths and limitations and justifying their suitability for different research situations.
|
|
Identify ethical problems in different scientific situations and discuss them
|
Identifies relevant ethical issues and discusses them using appropriate ethical concepts and well-reasoned arguments.
|
Critically analyses ethical issues from multiple perspectives, evaluates alternative courses of action, and justifies well-founded conclusions.
|
Grading criteria for QUI1:
|
E
|
D/C
|
B/A
|
|
Passed all five digital quizzes or their makeup
|
D: Passed at least two of the C exam criteria
C: Passed all three C exam criteria
|
B: Passed at least two of the oral exam criteria
A: Passed all three oral exam criteria
|
What alternative does the student have if they missed part of QUI1?
- You have makeup quizzes: one on 21st Oct and the second on 4th Dec, which are the same days as the makeup seminars, but the makeup quizzes are open from 9 AM to 7 PM, and they are digital.
- No alternative options for the C-examination. If you passed the quizzes but missed the C-Exam, you keep the E grade.
- If you missed the oral examination, you keep the grade from the C-Exam.
FINAL GRADE
Both QUI1 and HEM3 must be passed, and HEM1 must be completed
The final grade includes your QUI1, which is 5 quizzes(E), and the C exam if you take it, the oral examination if you take it, and HEM3 and all HEM1 completed. The final grade is the average of QUI1 and HEM3, if needed, rounded up to the higher grade.