Examiner is responsible to evaluate special kind of competences and control that 30 credits of a total of 60 credits correspond to an advanced level within the area of studies. Further it is needed a course related to theory of Science and Research Methods.
AI252X Degree Project in Real Estate Development and Land Law, Second Cycle 30.0 credits

Information per course offering
Choose semester and course offering to see current information and more about the course, such as course syllabus, study period, and application information.
Information for Spring 2025 Start 14 Jan 2025 programme students
- Course location
KTH Campus
- Duration
- 14 Jan 2025 - 2 Jun 2025
- Periods
- P3 (15.0 hp), P4 (15.0 hp)
- Pace of study
100%
- Application code
60375
- Form of study
Normal Daytime
- Language of instruction
Swedish
- Course memo
- Course memo is not published
- Number of places
Places are not limited
- Target group
- No information inserted
- Planned modular schedule
- [object Object]
- Schedule
- Schedule is not published
Contact
Course syllabus as PDF
Please note: all information from the Course syllabus is available on this page in an accessible format.
Course syllabus AI252X (Spring 2020–)Content and learning outcomes
Course contents
Intended learning outcomes
After a completed degree project, the student should be able to
-
show knowledge of the disciplinary foundation of the chosen subject area and best practice, an advanced understanding of current research and development work and advanced knowledge of methods.
-
demonstrate the ability to search for, collect and integrate knowledge in a comprehensive, critical, and systematic way and to identify his or her needs for further knowledge.
-
demonstrate the ability to identify, analyse, assess and handle complex phenomena, issues and situations, even with limited information.
-
demonstrate the ability to plan, and with adequate methods, carry out high-quality assignments within given time frames, as well as to evaluate this work.
-
demonstrate the ability to develop and evaluate products, processes, systems, methods or technical solutions, taking into consideration people's abilities and needs, and society's goals for economic, social and ecological sustainable development.
-
demonstrate orally and in writing the ability to, in dialogue with different groups, clearly account for and discuss his or her conclusions, including the knowledge and arguments that are the basis of such conclusions.
-
demonstrate the ability to exercise judgement, considering the relevant scientific, social and ethical aspects.
-
demonstrate the skills required to participate in research and development work or to independently work in other advanced contexts.
Literature and preparations
Specific prerequisites
All courses, that are required for issuing the Degree of Bachelor and at least 60 credits of courses for second-cycle studies, must be fully completed. These 60 credits must include all courses in the program, relevant to the degree project, and a course in theory of science.
A course in scientific methodology shall be completely reported with a passing grade.
Examiner is responsible to evaluate special kind of competences.
Literature
Relevant literature to be able to carry out the degree project
Examination and completion
If the course is discontinued, students may request to be examined during the following two academic years.
Grading scale
Examination
- XUPP - Degree Projekt, 30.0 credits, grading scale: P, F
Based on recommendation from KTH’s coordinator for disabilities, the examiner will decide how to adapt an examination for students with documented disability.
The examiner may apply another examination format when re-examining individual students.
The degree project should normally be carried out during the last semester of the educational programme.
To pass the degree project, the performance must not be unsatisfactory in any of the expected learning outcomes of the course.
Other requirements for final grade
An approved degree project report that has been presented at a seminar.
Examiner
Ethical approach
- All members of a group are responsible for the group's work.
- In any assessment, every student shall honestly disclose any help received and sources used.
- In an oral assessment, every student shall be able to present and answer questions about the entire assignment and solution.