Arguments and argument analysis, theoretical stances, interpretation of material remains, narrativity and descriptions, sociology of science and technology, network theories, sociotechnical systems.
FAK3104 Theory and Method in History, Part 2 7.5 credits
Questions about admittance and similar, please contact history@abe.kth.se
Questions about content, please contact: nina@kth.se
Arguments and argument analysis, theoretical stances, interpretation of material remains, narrativity and descriptions, sociology of science and technology, network theories, sociotechnical systems.
Information per course offering
Course offerings are missing for current or upcoming semesters.
Course syllabus as PDF
Please note: all information from the Course syllabus is available on this page in an accessible format.
Course syllabus FAK3104 (Spring 2019–)Content and learning outcomes
Course contents
Intended learning outcomes
For the research student after the course to be able to account for, discuss, analyse and apply material remains, central concepts in historical research as well as concepts of Science and Technology Studies (STS) including those of history of science and technology.
Literature and preparations
Specific prerequisites
Eligibility to be accepted in the graduate programme History of Technology and graded pass in Theory and Method in History, Part 1 (FAK3103) or corresponding course.
Recommended prerequisites
Equipment
Literature
Harry Collins & Trevor Pinch, The Golem: What you should know about science (1998); Wiebe Bijker et al., The Social Construction of Technological Systems (1987); Wiebe Bijker & John Law, Shaping Technology/Buiulding Society (1992); Sergio Sismondo, An Introduction to Science and Technology Studies (2004), Ian Hacking, The Social Construction of What (2000); Thomas Hughes, Networks of Power (1983) m.m.
Examination and completion
If the course is discontinued, students may request to be examined during the following two academic years.
Grading scale
Examination
- UPP1 - Essay, 7.5 credits, grading scale: P, F
Based on recommendation from KTH’s coordinator for disabilities, the examiner will decide how to adapt an examination for students with documented disability.
The examiner may apply another examination format when re-examining individual students.
Other requirements for final grade
Active participation in seminars and independently written essays..
Opportunity to complete the requirements via supplementary examination
Opportunity to raise an approved grade via renewed examination
Examiner
Ethical approach
- All members of a group are responsible for the group's work.
- In any assessment, every student shall honestly disclose any help received and sources used.
- In an oral assessment, every student shall be able to present and answer questions about the entire assignment and solution.