The degree project should be a part of a deeper study within the program area and be on an advanced level in order to fulfill the requirements for a Masters of Science in Engineering degree/Master of Science degree. This means that the degree project normally should be carried out within the area that the student has been prepared for. If the student would like to carry out the degree project within a different area this should be approved by the director of undergraduate education.
AI251X Degree project in Real Estate Development and Land Law, Second Cycle 30.0 credits
Content and learning outcomes
Course contents
Intended learning outcomes
The student should:
- Be able to apply relevant knowledge and skills that has been acquired within the main field of study, to a given problem.
- Within given bounds, and with limited information, independently be able to analyse and discuss complex issues and be able to handle larger problems on an advanced level within the field of study.
- Reflect about, evaluate and critically review their own and others scientific results.
- Be able to document and present their own work with high demands on structure, formal requirements and language skills.
- Be able to identify needs for further research and be able to continously develop their competence.
Literature and preparations
Specific prerequisites
All courses, that are required for issuing the Degree of Bachelor and at least 60 credits of courses for second-cycle studies, must be fully completed. These 60 credits must include all courses in the program, relevant to the degree project, and a course in theory of science.
A course in scientific methodology shall be completely reported with a passing grade.
Examiner is responsible to evaluate special kind of competences.
Recommended prerequisites
Equipment
Literature
Examination and completion
If the course is discontinued, students may request to be examined during the following two academic years.
Grading scale
Examination
- XUPP - Examination Question, 30.0 credits, grading scale: A, B, C, D, E, FX, F
Based on recommendation from KTH’s coordinator for disabilities, the examiner will decide how to adapt an examination for students with documented disability.
The examiner may apply another examination format when re-examining individual students.
Opportunity to complete the requirements via supplementary examination
Opportunity to raise an approved grade via renewed examination
Examiner
Ethical approach
- All members of a group are responsible for the group's work.
- In any assessment, every student shall honestly disclose any help received and sources used.
- In an oral assessment, every student shall be able to present and answer questions about the entire assignment and solution.
Further information
Course room in Canvas
Offered by
Main field of study
Education cycle
Add-on studies
Contact
Supplementary information
Examiner Peter Ekbäck (delegated to Thomas Kalbro, Eva Liedholm Johnson, Jonny Flodin, Jenny Paulsson, Eidar Lindgren).