Till KTH:s startsida Till KTH:s startsida

Visa version

Version skapad av Patric Jensfelt 2016-08-17 09:33

Visa nästa >
Jämför nästa >

Examination and grading

Intended learning outcomes

After completing the course the student should be able to

  • recall basic concepts in robotics
  • implement and integrate software components for robots
  • work in a team to solve a robotics task with limited resources 
  • identify and discuss ethical and societal aspects of robot technology
  • present work in written and oral form

in order to

  • be able to work with autonomous and other complex systems in research and/or development
  • become better at planning, executing and developing work in project groups.

Criteria based grading

We make use of a criteria based grading system. You will not collect points as in most other courses. Instead, to reach a certain grade you should show that you have fulfilled the criteria for that grade. In the tables below for lectures the means of examination has been indicated.

Note: The contest is not mentioned in any of the criteria. It is meant to be fun!

The matrix below shows which assessment tasks, assesses which ILO.

ILO 

Lab

Project

Essay

Exam

recall basic concepts in robotics

X X

implement and integrate software components for robots

work in a team to solve a robotics task with limited resources

X

identify and discuss ethical and societal aspects of robot technology

X

 present work in written and oral form

X

X

The matrix below shows to which level a certain ILO is assessed. The requirements for ILOs that are only assessed at an E level need to be met to pass the course but they do not influence the final grade in any other way.

ILO / Grade

E

D

C

B

A

recall basic concepts in robotics

X

implement and integrate software components for robots

X

X

X

work in a team to solve a robotics task with limited resources

X X X X X

identify and discuss ethical and societal aspects of robot technology

X

 present work in written and oral form

X

 

 

Criteria for the ILOs

Below the criteria for certain grades connected to certain ILOs are described.

NOTE: All criteria for the lower grades have to be fulfilled for the higher ones as well if not explicitly stated.

NOTE: It is up to the student to make sure that s/he shows someone from the teaching staff that s/he has reached a certain level for ILOs connected to the project work.

NOTE: In the cases where the grade is specified as an interval (ILO3 only defines levels E-D and C-A), the grade for this ILO can be considered the highest of the upper limit of the interval in operations for calculating the final grade. That is, a C-A for ILO3 can be thought of as an A in all calculations.

ILO 1: recall basic concepts in robotics

The gist of this ILO is that the student is able to interact in a working environment where robotics is the domain. This means that basic nomenclature and concepts needs to be known. It is possible to learn the details about things while working but unless you know the basics you cannot even discuss about robotics.

Grade

Criteria 

Pass
  1. Knows the basic nomenclature used in robotics
  2. Can recall basic concepts in the areas
    1. Locomotion and kinematics
    2. Manipulators
    3. Sensors and perception
    4. Navigation
    5. Mapping and localisation

This is tested in the written exam.

ILO 2: implement and integrate software components for robots

Grade

Criteria 

E
  1. The student has implemented simple components using the ROS framework on a robot system running Linux.
  2. The student is able to explain how the overall system is designed, highlighting the most important design choices.
C
  1. The student has provided help in implementing a working complex component which is used by the system or helped with the integration of all components and helped with the implementation of one component.
  2. The student can explain the basic principles of all parts of the system. The student can also discuss the strengths and weaknesses of the integrated system.
A
  1. The student has been the main contributor in the implementation of one or more complex components which works well and is used by the integrated robot system or has integrated all components and made important contributions to one component used by the system.
  2. The student can explain the principles of all parts of the system, analyse and discuss what their strengths and weaknesses are and how they are integrated. The student can also analyse and discuss the strengths and weaknesses of the integrated system and suggest improvements.

This ILO is assessed during the project work. Note that all sub criteria for a certain grade level has to be fulfilled to meet the requirement for that grade. 

A student that falls short of some but not all requirements for A but meets all requirements for C can be given a B, and similar when the student is between an E and a C.

ILO 3: work in a team to solve a robotics task with limited resources

Grade

Criteria 

E-D
  1. The team is able to implement a system that can perform the task defined by milestone M1 during the course.
  2. The student takes active part in the work in the project during the duration of the project and when not able to take part lets the other members know about it.
C-A
  1. The team is able to implement a system that can perform the task defined by milestone M2 during the course.
  2. The student is able to communicate well with the group and deal with possible conflicts.
  3. The team can organise their work to complete tasks in a timely manner (meeting milestones).
  4. The student can make a plan coordinated with the project group and follow it for completing assigned tasks in a timely manner.

This is tested in the project work.

ILO 4: identify and discuss ethical and societal aspects of robot technology

Grade

Criteria 

Pass

Can identify and discuss ethical and societal aspects in the use of robot technology today.

This is tested in the essay.

ILO 5: present work in written and oral form

Grade

Criteria 

Pass
  1. Can present the work performed in Lab1 orally so that the teacher understands what has been done and how
  2. Can write an essay in a language that is grammatically correct and understandable. 
  3. Can present the work performed in the project orally during project meetings with the teaching staff.
  4. Can present the work performed in the project in writing (by writing at least one of the progress reports).
  5. Takes active part in the presentation of the project work (seminar)

Additional course requirements

In addition to fulfilling the requirements connected to the assessment tasks described above the student also needs to perform the following:

  • Individual

    • Individual plan (IP) for the course: Describe what grade you aim for and what you plan to do to reach it
    • Revision of IP: Revise the IP some way into the project
    • A reflection (1 page typically) on your work in the course. Did you learn what you wanted? What did you spend time on (account for the time you spent)?
    • A reflection (1 page typically) on the work within the group. What worked within the group? What did not? Could you have planned something differently?

  • In project groups

    • Write weekly progress reports during the project

    • Project plan

    • Write a project report

    • Be represented at the day of the contest

The final grade 

To pass the course the student needs to meet the requirements at an E level for all goals and the additional course requirements listed above. Since this is a team project driven course, the grading system is meant to reward individual contributions to the project work but with a strong emphasis on how the student collaborated together with the team. The final grade on the course is therefore given by the minimum of grades on ILO2 and ILO3.

Examples:

  • Grade A on ILO2 and E-D on ILO3 gives D
  • Grade D on ILO2 and C-A on ILO3 gives D
  • Grade C on ILO2 and C-A on ILO3 gives C
  • Grade A,B, or C respectively on ILO2 and C-A on ILO3 gives A, B or C respectively

Individual learning plan

Each student will be asked to write a plan for his/her learning at the beginning of the course. This plan should include a short description of the students background and prior knowledge and what s/he wants to learn. It should also contain a statement about what grade the student is aiming for and how s/he plans to achieve this grade. These documents should be discussed within the project group and each student will be given feedback regarding the plan. 

It is very hard to write an accurate plan with partial or even very incomplete knowledge which is the case at the start of the project. Therefore, a revised version of the plan will be made some way into the project. The idea is to allow to incorporate changes in the plan and grade ambitions.

It is through this plan and the interaction with the teaching team that the interpretation of the criteria for the ILOs is made for each individual case. A robot system is so advanced that it is impossible to write down exactly what is required for every possible situation that might occur.

Assessment of ILO2 and ILO3

The assessment of ILO2 and ILO3 will be through interaction with the project group and the members in it. Each group will be assigned a TA who will follow their work. This TA will meet with the group regularly and follow up the work and the progress of the group and each student. One of the aims is that each student should know as well as possible at all times how well the criteria for these ILOs are met. This means that a student might know that the requirements for grade X has been met for ILO2 well before the course is over. Note however that ILO3 requires active participation to the end. The hope is that students who have fulfilled their goals for ILO2 will focus on the overall project and do what is best for the team rather than trying to make the best possible individual component.

TAs will meet with students on individual basis for some parts of the assessment.