The Master programme is concluded with a degree project in which the student is expected to demonstrate ability to independently solve an engineering problem by using a broad spectrum of skills. The subject for the degree project can vary but it must contain significant technical contents, have a clear application within chosen field and, if applicable, contribute to sustainable development. Provided that the degree project satisfies the requirements above, as decided by the course coordinator or examiner, and provided that qualified supervision is provided throughout the degree project, the student can choose to carry out the degree project either at an academic department, within an industrial company, or at a consulting firm, in Sweden or abroad.
MJ240X Degree Project in Energy Technology, Second Cycle 30.0 credits
Information per course offering
Choose semester and course offering to see current information and more about the course, such as course syllabus, study period, and application information.
Information for Spring 2025 Start 14 Jan 2025 programme students
- Course location
KTH Campus
- Duration
- 14 Jan 2025 - 2 Jun 2025
- Periods
- P3 (15.0 hp), P4 (15.0 hp)
- Pace of study
100%
- Application code
60904
- Form of study
Normal Daytime
- Language of instruction
English
- Course memo
- Course memo is not published
- Number of places
Places are not limited
- Target group
- No information inserted
- Planned modular schedule
- [object Object]
- Schedule
- Schedule is not published
- Part of programme
- No information inserted
Contact
Course syllabus as PDF
Please note: all information from the Course syllabus is available on this page in an accessible format.
Course syllabus MJ240X (Spring 2022–)Content and learning outcomes
Course contents
Intended learning outcomes
- demonstrate knowledge and understanding of the scientific foundation and best practices for the chosen subject, as well as an advanced understanding in current research and development, and in-depth knowledge of methodology.
- demonstrate the ability to search, gather and integrate knowledge and identify their need for additional knowledge, all with a holistic, critical and systematic work approach.
- demonstrate the ability to identify, analyse, assess and handle complex phenomena, issues and situations also with limited information
- demonstrate the ability to plan and with adequate methods carry out qualified assignments within given time frames and to evaluate this work
- demonstrate the ability to orally and in writing in dialogue with different groups clearly account for and discuss his conclusions and the knowledge and the arguments that these are based on
- demonstrate the ability to make assessments considering relevant scientific, social and ethical aspects
- demonstrate the skills required to participate in research and development work, or to work independently in other qualified activities
Literature and preparations
Specific prerequisites
To begin the thesis project, second cycle, requires:
- completed courses corresponding to at least 60 credits at the second cycle
- completed course in ”Scientific Research Methodology”
- able to demonstrate sufficient specific subject knowledge in relation for the chosen area for the thesis project
Equipment
Literature
Examination and completion
If the course is discontinued, students may request to be examined during the following two academic years.
Grading scale
Examination
- XUPP - Thesis Project, 30.0 credits, grading scale: P, F
Based on recommendation from KTH’s coordinator for disabilities, the examiner will decide how to adapt an examination for students with documented disability.
The examiner may apply another examination format when re-examining individual students.
Besides the established KTH criteria for passing a second cycle degree project, the course specific criteria are:
Concluded project work with agreed deliverables, attendance at compulsory seminars, presentation at these, public discussion and completion of final report.
Opportunity to complete the requirements via supplementary examination
Opportunity to raise an approved grade via renewed examination
Examiner
Ethical approach
- All members of a group are responsible for the group's work.
- In any assessment, every student shall honestly disclose any help received and sources used.
- In an oral assessment, every student shall be able to present and answer questions about the entire assignment and solution.