DA239X Degree Project in Computer Science and Engineering, Second Cycle 30.0 credits

Before the degree project course is started, the student should identify an appropriate degree project assignment and formulate a project proposal, so that this can be approved by the examiner. The assignment should be chosen so that it implies a natural progression of the knowledge and skills that have been acquired within the education and in a possible specialisation within the education.

• The student writes an individual plan for the degree project, in which the problem description/assignment and the preconditions for the implementation of the work are specified.
• The student carries out an in-depth pre-study including discussions of method choice and theoretical background with a literature study that is reported as part of a draft to a preliminary version of the written degree project report.
• The student independently carries out a degree project, where knowledge and methods from the education are applied.
• The student plans and carries out an oral presentation and defence of his or her degree project.
• The student carries out an oral and written review of another second-cycle degree project.
• The student writes and presents a written degree project report, where the student clearly accounts for and discusses own conclusions in the degree project and the knowledge and the arguments that underpin them.
• The student carries out a self-evaluation of the degree project according to established model.

After passing the degree project course, the student should be able to:

• show advanced knowledge within the main field of study/the specialisation for the education, including advanced insight into current research and development work,
• show methodological knowledge within the main field of study/the specialisation for the education,
• participate in research and development work and thereby contribute to the knowledge development,
• with a holistic approach, critically, independently and creatively identify, formulate, analyse, assess and deal with complex phenomena and issues, even with limited information,
• plan and with adequate methods carry out qualified assignments within given frames, and evaluate this work,
• integrate knowledge critically and systematically and identify the need of additional knowledge
• in Swedish or in English, in speech and writing clearly report and discuss their conclusions and the knowledge and arguments on which they are based,
• within the frames of the degree project identify the role of the scholarship and the engineer in the society,
• within the frame of the specific degree project identify which issues that need to be answered in order to observe relevant dimensions of sustainable development,
• within the frames of the degree project assess and show awareness of ethical aspects of research and development work, with respect to methods, working methods and results of the degree project

in order to

• be able to participate in research and development or work independently in other qualified activities according to the national aims for a Degree of Master of Science in Engineering and Degree of Master of Science in Higher Education Ordinance.

Passed courses at second cycle level of at least 60 credits, including courses that are relevant for the degree project.

If the course is discontinued, students may request to be examined during the following two academic years.

• PRO1 - Project, 7.5 credits, grading scale: P, F
• PRO2 - Project, 15.0 credits, grading scale: P, F
• PRO3 - Project, 7.5 credits, grading scale: P, F

Based on recommendation from KTH’s coordinator for disabilities, the examiner will decide how to adapt an examination for students with documented disability.

The examiner may apply another examination format when re-examining individual students.

In PRO1 is included

• an individual plan for degree project
• a pre-study, a discussion of choice of method, and a literature study.

In PRO2 is included

• a written report with abstract in both Swedish and English.
• a self-assessment report.

In PRO3 is included

• an oral presentation
• a written and oral review (public discussion) of another student's second-cycle degree project
• the final version of the report.

Active attendance at two oral presentations of second-cycle degree projects.

All parts of the examination should be approved within a year from the start of the degree project. Otherwise, the degree project will be ended with a failed grade, unless special circumstances apply.

Patric Jensfelt

Roberto Bresin

Henrik Artman

Anders Hedman

Bobby Lee Townsend Sturm JR

Roberto Guanciale

Gerald Quentin Maguire Jr

Stefano Markidis

Mario Romero Vega

Johan Håstad

Joakim Gustafsson

Rolf Stadler

Jana Tumova

Marco Chiesa

Ylva Fernaeus

Olov Engwall

Aristides Gionis

Tino Weinkauf

John Folkesson

Cristian Bogdan

Erik Fransén

Mads Dam

Bo Peng

Jan Ingemar Markendahl

Rob Comber

Elena Troubitsyna

Mats Nordahl

Eva-Lotta Sallnäs Pysander

Mårten Björkman

Iolanda Dos Santos Carvalho Leite

Kristina Höök

Carlo Fischione

Hedvig Kjellström

Haibo Li

Mathias Ekstedt

Jonas Beskow

Robert Lagerström

Sandra Pauletto

Magnus Boman

Viggo Kann

Leif Dahlberg

Dejan Manojlo Kostic

Danica Kragic Jensfelt

Panagiotis Papadimitratos

Leif Handberg

Cyrille Artho

György Dán

Viktoria Fodor

Pawel Herman

Benoit Baudry

Douglas Wikström

Jan Gulliksen

Sten Ternström

Arvind Kumar

Martin Monperrus

• All members of a group are responsible for the group's work.
• In any assessment, every student shall honestly disclose any help received and sources used.
• In an oral assessment, every student shall be able to present and answer questions about the entire assignment and solution.

Further information about the course can be found on the Course web at the link below. Information on the Course web will later be moved to this site.

In this course, the EECS code of honor applies, see:
http://www.kth.se/en/eecs/utbildning/hederskodex