Last week, I took part in the WASP panel webinar on Diversity and Inclusion in Academia, where we discussed how global mobility shapes the competitiveness of Swedish research and innovation. Only days later, the U.S. announced new restrictions on its H-1B visa program: a $100,000 fee for all new petitions. For early-career researchers, that barrier is not small.

This matters for Sweden. For years, the U.S. has been the primary magnet for ambitious young scientists and engineers. If that door narrows, a major opportunity opens if we act strategically.

The good news is that we are not starting from zero. The Wallenberg Foundations have already launched some of the largest private research investments in Swedish history, from WASP (AI and autonomous systems) to WISE (materials science), programs explicitly designed to attract and nurture top international talent. The Swedish Research Council (VR) is also running schemes to bring outstanding researchers to Swedish universities.

At KTH, we see the value of international talent every day. We host international PhD candidates, postdocs, and faculty whose expertise is vital to Sweden’s research and innovation ecosystem.

But here is the real challenge: attraction is not the same as retention. Funding packages and recruitment programs bring people in, yet what keeps them here is a different story:

• Predictable career paths and long-term contracts
• Immigration and residence rules that support families and stability
• Strong industry links and opportunities for collaboration
• A sense of belonging and inclusion in our research culture

So the questions we face are:

• How can Sweden convert this moment of opportunity into a lasting advantage?
• What barriers still make us lose talent after a PhD or postdoc?
• How do we ensure that the talent arriving through Wallenberg, VR, Vinnova, and other programs — and joining us at KTH and other Swedish universities — builds roots here rather than treating Sweden as a stepping stone?

The global competition for talent is intensifying. China, in particular, is stepping up its recruitment efforts through major funding and talent return programs. Other non-European countries are also scaling up their strategies. The U.S. decision may have made international talent more accessible for us, but accessibility is not the same as success. That will depend on how well we align national policy, university structures, and industry partnerships to turn attraction into retention. Beyond research investments, Sweden’s social system itself is a major advantage. Universal healthcare, affordable childcare, generous parental leave, and a strong emphasis on work–life balance offer international researchers a kind of stability that is rare in many competing countries. This is not just a social benefit; it is a competitive strength. We should be better at highlighting and advertising these qualities when attracting global talent.

Because in the end, talent is not just a resource to be imported. It is the foundation of our ability to innovate, grow, and respond to society’s biggest challenges.

A new semester is starting, and the campus is coming back to life. It’s a pleasure to welcome colleagues after the summer break, and to greet all students beginning or continuing their studies. At KTH, this season is particularly colorful with all the introductory activities in place.

It is also a moment to reflect. Our core mission, research and education, does not happen in isolation. Our universities exist within a broader ecosystem, political, cultural, and social, that can either support or undermine what we do.

Recently, I was struck by the words of Terence Tao, one of the most influential mathematicians of our time, in a blog post reflecting on sudden political interference in U.S. science policy: “the luxury of disengagement is no longer an option.” His message resonates far beyond that context: if we as academics withdraw, decisions about the future of research and education will be made without us. Engagement matters and is needed at every level: management, faculty, and students.

Sweden has a strong tradition of investing in higher education and research, and of fostering openness and international collaboration. But even here, universities face important questions: How do we secure long-term funding for basic science in a system that increasingly favors short-term impact? How do we protect the freedom to ask unexpected questions? How do we ensure that students receive an education that prepares them for a rapidly changing world? These are not questions we can leave to others.

Engagement is part of the answer. For students, it can mean curiosity, critical thinking, and active participation in university life. For faculty and staff, it may be sharing research with a broader audience, teaching with care, joining in collegial discussions, serving on committees, or defending the principles of openness and academic freedom. At KTH, it can also be as concrete as contributing to curriculum development, supporting new pedagogical initiatives, or working across departments on common challenges. Small acts of engagement add up to a culture where science and education can thrive.

As we begin this semester, I look forward to the work ahead and to the engagement that will continue to shape our community. Engagement will matter more than ever.

As we conclude the academic year, we mark one of the most significant moments in university life: the graduation of our students. Warm congratulations to all our graduates, at the bachelor’s, master’s, and doctoral levels. Your achievements represent years of focused effort, intellectual development, and perseverance. We are proud of what you have accomplished and look forward to the impact you will make in your fields and in society.

This moment of transition invites both celebration and reflection, not only on what has been completed, but on the broader responsibilities we share as an academic institution.

At a technical university, education and research are deeply dependent on infrastructure. Laboratories, workshops, and advanced digital environments are not peripheral, they are central to how we teach, explore, and innovate. From early-stage undergraduate labs to master’s theses and doctoral projects, these environments form the backbone of hands-on, inquiry-driven learning and technological advancement.

Looking ahead, the accelerating development of AI is likely to reshape many aspects of technical education. Tasks related to computation and coding may become increasingly automated, shifting the emphasis in our curricula. At the same time, this evolution will make the laborative elements of engineering education even more essential. Experimental skills, systems understanding, and the ability to simulate and connect theory with physical reality will remain irreplaceable, and may, in fact, grow in importance.

In this light, Sweden should reflect on how it supports and sustains the infrastructure that underpins progress in science and technology. At the same time, KTH must continue to examine how we organize, prioritize, and develop these resources to meet the evolving needs of education and research.

We also face broader questions about the role of higher education in a changing world. Beyond technical expertise, our graduates must be equipped to think critically, act ethically, and navigate uncertainty with independence and initiative, especially in the use of AI.

These are challenges we embrace, as educators, researchers, and institutional leaders.

To all students, colleagues, and partners: thank you for your engagement and contributions throughout the year. I wish you a well-deserved and recharging summer, with time to pause, reflect, and return with renewed energy.

May 12 marks an important annual milestone: the celebration of women in mathematics, honoring the legacy of Maryam Mirzakhani. It’s both a moment of recognition and a chance to reflect on the progress, and the gaps in building a more inclusive, supportive, and dynamic academic culture.

This year, I took part in a conference at KTH Royal Institute of Technology, one of many international scientific gatherings held around May 12. These are not just symbolic events, they are serious academic forums that also provide space for examining structural barriers and identifying ways forward.

Diversity in academia is not only a matter of fairness, it’s a driver of better research. Studies show that ethnically diverse teams produce more innovative, higher-impact work and are less susceptible to groupthink (Freeman & Huang, Nature, 2014). Inclusive environments lead to stronger science.

Mobility is key to sustaining that diversity. International collaboration and academic exchange bring in new ideas, approaches, and connections. But access to mobility remains uneven. According to the Swedish Foundation for International Cooperation in Research and Higher Education (STINT), internationally mobile researchers in Sweden are generally more productive and more cited, yet women are still significantly underrepresented among them (STINT, 2020).

Family responsibilities, financial constraints, and institutional structures often limit mobility for researchers of all genders, especially those with caregiving duties. To help address these barriers, the School of Engineering Sciences at KTH is launching a new sabbatical program that covers not only travel costs but also family-related expenses, such as school fees for children: SCI Sabbatical Program. While remote work has eased professional continuity for some partners, the logistics and costs of moving a family remain a major hurdle, particularly for early-career researchers.

Broader national data from the Swedish Higher Education Authority (UKÄ) reinforces this picture. Academic mobility in Sweden is growing, but still faces systemic bottlenecks related to funding, gender, and career stage (UKÄ, 2023).

If we want to unlock the full potential of academic talent, these are the friction points we must address.

The aim of initiatives like the KTH-SCI sabbatical program isn’t to tick a diversity box, it’s to build a more sustainable, equitable, and globally connected research environment. That’s the academic culture we should be working toward.

This Friday, the Göran Gustafsson Foundation hosts its annual prize ceremony, an event I’m proud to attend. These prizes, awarded to outstanding young researchers (under 37) from KTH and Uppsala University, are among Sweden’s most respected recognitions of early-career scientific achievement.

What sets the Göran Gustafsson Foundation apart is not just its financial support, but the vision behind it. Göran Gustafsson (1919–2003), a self-made entrepreneur from humble beginnings in northern Sweden, created two major research foundations to give back to society and advance knowledge that improves people’s lives and the world around them. From cutting birchwood at age twelve with a small loan backed by his mother, to building one of Sweden’s largest real estate portfolios, Gustafsson never lost sight of his belief that individuals have a responsibility to care for their environment and make thoughtful, lasting contributions.

Since its founding in 1986 with a SEK 135 million donation to KTH and Uppsala University, followed by SEK 270 million in 1989 for national prizes,  the Göran Gustafsson Foundation has supported hundreds of scientists in physics, chemistry, molecular biology, mathematics, and medicine. This year, SEK 21.25 million will be distributed through the KTH and Uppsala prizes. Beyond the monetary support, these prizes represent a strong vote of confidence and an invitation for young researchers to pursue bold, ambitious work. More information about this year’s prize recipients and their research is available on their website.

But why should this matter beyond the individuals receiving the awards?

Because the larger system is under strain. Across Sweden and Europe, young researchers face fierce competition for shrinking public funds, often tied to narrow, short-term targets. Time for creative exploration is becoming scarce, while administrative demands grow. Without support mechanisms like the Göran Gustafsson Foundation, or nationally, the Knut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation, which has invested over SEK 47 billion in Swedish research, many promising talents risk being lost before they can reach their full potential.

This prompts a larger question: Are we doing enough to secure the future of Swedish science? Because research is not only about solving today’s problems, it’s about asking tomorrow’s questions. Are we giving young researchers the freedom, resources, and stability they need to focus on what matters, asking hard questions, exploring new paths, and laying the groundwork for future breakthroughs?

In this context, it’s worth noting how Sweden’s philanthropic landscape compares internationally, and how it has evolved. Earlier European-wide data (Fondation de France, 2015) reported that Swedish foundations contributed about 14% of the national research budget, with nearly half of their philanthropic budgets going specifically to science and higher education. More recent data (OECD, 2023) shows that foundations and non-profits now provide around 26.9% of the research grant income to Swedish universities, while government agencies contribute about 47.6% and EU sources about 9.9%. This marks a notable growth in the role of private foundations over the past decade, reflecting how Swedish philanthropy has become an increasingly important complement to public funding.

The Göran Gustafsson Foundation’s long-term commitment has made a meaningful difference to Swedish science, especially for young researchers. At the same time, the future of research cannot rest on philanthropy alone. If Sweden wants to stay a strong research nation, we must keep considering how to offer young researchers not only funding, but also the time, space, and trust they need to do meaningful work.