MSc-supervision-group Petter, Christian and Patric

This group is created for structuring the group supervision of Master thesis projects supervised by Petter. The structure is reused from previous years, so some links might be outdated (my apologies for this).

General information can be found here (2019)

Students 2024

Guanyu Lin <guanyul@kth.se>, Supervisors: Mart and Jonathan, Examiner: Petter

Students 2023

Approximate Meeting times (with deadlines some days earlier)

Rough outline of the work 

1. Initial description of task
2. First meeting 
3. Specification (Assignment 1)
   1. Hand in detailed specification with time plan ( - 4 days)
   2. Hand in peer-review comments on specification ( - 2 days)
   3. Discussion meeting about specifications (Date and time agreed upon, see table above)
   4. Update specification (asap)
   5. Examiner approves the specification
4. Literature study (A2)
   1. Hand in background/theory/literature study (-4 days)
   2. Hand in peer-review comments on theory/background/literature (-2 days)
   3. Discussion on the background/theory/literature study (PRO1 approved) (Date and time agreed upon, see table above)
5. Report Skeleton (A3) (and A4 at the same time)
   1. Hand in thesis report skeleton (-4 days)
   2. Hand in peer-review comments on report skeleton (-2days)
   3. Discussion on the report skeleton (Date and time agreed upon, see table above)
6. Half time seminar (A4) (same time as A3)
7. Draft of Report (A5)
   1. Hand in full draft of the report (-4 days)
   2. Hand in peer-review comments on the draft report (-2 days)
   3. Discussion meeting about draft reports (Date and time agreed upon, see table above)
8. Report for presentation (A6)
   1. Hand in report for presentation to supervisor (Date and time agreed upon, see table above)
   2. Hand in report for presentation to examiner  (after supervisor feedback has been incorporated, and supervisor has approved the report), including (self assessment) where the relevant boxes are filled in by student and supervisor. 
   3. Approval from the examiner for presentation (PRO2 approved) 
9. Oral presentation (A7) (Fixed) 
10. Final version of the report (A8) (Date and time agreed upon, see table above)
11. (self assessment) (A9) (after final report, needed for approval)

Possibly old information

Please look at the information pages for thesis projects. Unfortunately these are a lot better in Swedish than in English. Swedish version is found here and the English here. You will be assessed according to these guidelines.

The application form can be found here.

Grading criteria are here (when applicable).

(consult this page for more info (only available in Swedish...))

Students 2022

Supervisors and Examiners 2021

• Christian Smith, ccs@kth.se
• Petter Ögren, petter@kth.se
• Jonathan Styrud, jstyrud@kth.se
• Matteo Iovino, matteo.iovino@se.abb.com
• Pouria Tajvar, tajvar@kth.se
• Özer Özkahraman, ozero@kth.se
• Chris Sprague, sprague@kth.se
• Sriharsha Vishnu Bhat, svbhat@kth.se

Students 2020

• Marcus Andersson, (and8@kth.se)
• Louis Muffang (muffang@kth.se)

Students 2019

• Mart Kartasev (spring)
• Aron Granberg (spring)
• Corentin Chauvin-Hameau (corch@kth.se)
• Maxime Sainte Catherine (maximesc@kth.se)

Supervisors 2019

• Christopher Sprague (sprague@kth.se)
• Petter Ögren (petter@kth.se)