KTH Logo

Gender and Technology course – featuring the student posters about trouble with gender biases in technology

Did you know that AI generated photos depict women in a more sexualized manner than their male counterparts? Or that KTH’s own learning platform Canvas should include queer inclusive pronouns? Have you heard about the pill for men and why it has been a long time in the making? And did you know that some scientific fieldwork is only accessible for certain groups of people?

Those timely and thought provoking topics were addressed by the students in this terms poster presentation session in the Gender and Technology course. Click on each picture below to get a full size readable PDF!

Check out the poster ‘Digital Space – Whose Representation’. The group analyzed queer technology in our society, specifically in online identities and used Canvas and Linkedin as examples. This poster has some real world impact because it addresses KTH’s learning platform. The students are invited to talk about their results concerning CANVAS in the ABE schools working group for gender equality, diversity and equal treatment issues (JML).

The poster ‘Gender and Medicine – Female Contraception’ addresses the injustice women have faced in the medical world. The students found that contraceptive research and testing has been dismissive of female health struggles, while male contraceptives are tested more rigorously and introduced with great caution.

‘AI Generated images’ addresses the biases that are embedded in algorithms used by AI technology. The students found that AI generated images of male and female avatars are sexist. They discovered that with the same prompt female avatars showed more skin while male avatars were depicted as astronauts or scientists.

Another student group worked with ‘Intersectionality and fieldwork’ asking how fieldwork could be adapted to become more inclusive. The students suggested some remedies, like using remote sensing technology for observation in the field and introducing code of conducts to improve the working environment during fieldwork.

‘Artificial intelligence and data feminism’ discusses how algorithm developers can become more aware of their own biases in order to counter-act discriminatory gender representation on the internet. They group found some possible solutions to counter-act invisible biases by increasing transparency and participation in developing AI algorithms.

I hope that those posters are food for thought, for not only the Gender & Technology class of 2023, but all students and employees at KTH who are interested in promoting and maintaining are more inclusive, open and nurturing learning environment for all of us.

A special thanks to the students of the Gender & Technology class of 2023.

Profile picture of Tirza MeyerAuthor Tirza Meyer, course responsible teacher for Gender & Technology, 2023.

Open Access to Sport, Performance and Sustainability

Is the strive for increasing performance and an ever-growing sports sector compatible with sustainable development? This is the key issue that the authors investigates in a new book: Sport, Performance and Sustainability, edited by Daniel Svensson, Erik Backman, Susanna Hedenborg and the Division’s Sverker Sörlin.

Sport, Performance and Sustainability examines the logic of “faster higher, and stronger” and the technoscientific revolution that has driven tremendous growth in the sports economy and in sport performance over the last 100 years.

The chapters provide valuable perspectives on the tensions between performance and sustainability. Co-authors include Sigmund Loland, Simon Beames, Itai Danielski, Andreas Isgren Karlsson, Jack Reed, Johan Carlsson, Isak Lidström, Bo Carlsson and Marie Larneby.

Sport, performance and Sustainability is publisehd by Routledge and written within MISTRA Sport and Outdoor – a research and collaboration programme to generate knowledge and solutions for increased sustainability in sport and outdoor recreation.

The book is due for printing now in May, but is also available open access online. Find it here: Sport, Performance and Sustainability

The Editors

Daniel Svensson is an Associate Senior Lecturer in Sport Management at the Department of Sport Sciences. He defended at the Division in 2016 with the thesis “Scientizing performance in endurance sports : The emergence of ‘rational training’ in cross-country skiing, 1930-1980,”.

Erik Backman is an Associate Professor and Senior Lecturer in Pedagogy and Sport Sciences at the Department of Sport Sciences, School of Health and Welfare, Dalarna University, Sweden, and Associate Professor at the Department of Primary and Secondary Teacher Education, Faculty of Education and International Studies, Oslo Metropolitan University, Norway.

Susanna Hedenborg is a Professor in Sport Sciences at Malmö University, Sweden, and the President of the Swedish Research Council for Sport Science.

Sverker Sörlin is a Professor of Environmental History at the Division  and a co-founder of the KTH Environmental Humanities Laboratory.

 

Sverker Sörlin Corresponding Member of The Royal Danish Academy of Sciences and Letters

The Royal Danish Academy of Sciences and Letter, founded in 1742, is a learned society composed of elected members. In March the Academy elected Sverker as corresponding member of the Humanities and Social Sciences Class.

The task of the Academy is to strengthen the position of scholarship in Denmark and further inter-disciplinary understanding. The Royal Danish Academy has about 250 national members and about 250 international members. The members are prominent scientists within both the humanities and social sciences as well as the natural sciences. Each year, a number of new members are elected, and these members will then either belong to the Class of the Humanities and Social Sciences or the Class of Natural Sciences. In even years, 9 new members of the Class of Natural Sciences are elected. In odd years, 6 new members of the Class of Humanities and Social Sciences are elected.

Sverker was elected into the Humanities and Social Sciences Class, in recognition of his academic excellence.

Links

Mid-Seminar: The Qualitization of the Humanities: Changing Articulations of Research Quality

Please be warmly welcome to attend Klara Müller’s mid-seminar in doctoral education, here at KTH Campus on Monday April 24.

The Qualitization of the Humanities: Changing Articulations of Research Quality

“Placed at the intersection between research policy, STS and the history of humanities, the project aims to analyze quality articulations on both the micro-level and the macro-level of the humanities since the 1980s. This is done through a combination of various methodological approaches such as archival research, oral history and bibliometrics.”

Doctoral student: Klara Müller, Division of History of Science, Technology and Environment, KTH
Supervisor: Sverker Sörlin, KTH & Linus Salö, Stockholm University
Opponent: Vera Schwach, Doctor and Research Professor at NIFU, Nordisk Institutt for Studier av Innovasjon, Forskning og Utdanning

Time: Mon 2023-04-24 13.15 – 14.45
Location: the seminar room at the Division (Teknikringen 74 D, level 5)
Language: English

Performing my ecopoem Dia do Não [Day of No] – Nuno Marques

Nuna Marques, postdoctor at the Division and the KTH Centre EHL, attended a eco poetry reading during the Ecopoetry Workshop at  the #APHELEIA 2023 seminar on Adaptation and Transformation: Community-based Practices in Mação, Portugal. Read his full performance below.
Author: Nuno Marques, postdoctoral researcher at the Division

at an ecopoetry workshop I was invited to say something about this poem as ecopoem. Here is what I said:[1]

this poem is a composition about/with killing and eating animals and the violence inherent to human and family relationships. It is also about tenderness.

It deals with the killing of pigs in Portugal done in traditional ways, not in slaughterhouses where animals that are industrially raised ­– the actual term is produced– are killed.

I based it on my experiences during childhood and adolescence with taking part in killing pigs and cutting them; preparing sausages, and in all the processes that happen after the animal is dead.

I used some specific vocabulary of the Center region of Portugal, where I am from, for names of tools, body parts of pigs, gestures, plants, food. This is the area of Portugal where almost all the meat that is eaten in the country is produced – pig, chicken, turkey and others.

Lack of regulation on waste waters has turned the river Lis that crosses the region in one of the most polluted rivers of Portugal from wastewater coming from animal production but also from leather and grain production units.[2]

This is a long poem created by several sections that can be read separately but that work better in relation. I mostly use verbs. Sometimes verbs as adjectives and verbs as nouns. This I learned, as translator and researcher, from North American poets as Brenda Hillman; Evelyn Reilly; Allison Cobb; John Cage; Gary Snyder; Michael McClure; Charles Olson; Susan Howe.[3]

Vegan ecofeminism is important as well – Carol J. Adams’ The Sexual Politics of Meat ­– for the distinction between corpse/cadaver and meat – which is a cultural construction operated by separation and differentiation:

to cut bodies into meat to cut the word

verb as action

I also wanted to work with rhythm and sound, so I use repetitions. Hopefully these create, through interrelations within the poem, sets of frequencies that distribute the action of cutting in long time frames: from childhood till today.

The title Dia do Não  [Day of No] refers to the day before the killing in which the pig has no water and no food:

a time and space of negativity

The poem is accompanied by images by the Portuguese artist André Alves. Images and words follow different directions:

the text starts from  the whole body and ends with the cut pieces; from concrete to abstract; the image from abstract parts to the whole body. I have Rita Barreira to thank for this idea as well as for suggesting working with André.

I consider this an ecopoem because by engaging the cultural constructions of animals as non-others in the Center region it brings forth the environmental history of animal production in this area. The poem entangles culture and nature; flesh meat tendons muscles smiles love cross between pigs and humans, knifes separate, as Evelyn Reilly asks in Echolocation: “And why should our bodies end at our skin?”

 

Dia do Não was published as a full-length book in Portugal by Douda Correria in 2018. Some sections have been published at: Revista Inefável 15 (online). Other sections are forthcoming in the Ibero-American anthology Futuros Multiespecie edited by Azucena Castro for Bartlebooth (in press); and the Brazilian, African, and

Portuguese ecopoetry anthology O Livro do Verso Vivo (in press), edited by Thássio Ferreira and Maurício Vieira.

 


[1] The reading took place during the Ecopoetry Workshop at  the #APHELEIA 2023 seminar on Adaptation and Transformation: Community-based Practices in Mação, Portugal. It was organized by BRIDGES UNESCO Sustainability Science Coalition. Poets attending: Esthela Calderon (Nicaragua), Juan Carlos Galeano (Colombia & USA), Nuno Marques (Portugal), José Manuel Marrero Henríquez (Canary Islands), Bernard Quetchenbach (USA) and Catarina Santiago Costa (Portugal).

[2] See https://csg.rc.iseg.ulisboa.pt/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/E-Book_PortugalAmbienteEmMovimento.pdf

[3] I discuss particulars of form in North American ecopoetry here: http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-298467

Mark your Calendars for Scientific Prediction in the 20th Century and From Water to Nuclear to Catastrophe

Within one week we have two exciting seminars to invite you to! First out is Eglė Rindzevičiūtė who will give a talk on Scientific Prediction in the 20th Century on Friday March 13. On Monday March 20, Eglė will visit us in the role as discussion leader and opponent, when Achim Klüppelberg has his final seminar in doctoral training.

Scientific Prediction in the 20th Century: Mapping Ideas, Institutions and Practices Across the Cold War Divide

atominisIMG_7588Eglė Rindzevičiūtė is an Associate Professor of Criminology and Sociology, Kingston University London, with an interest in governance, knowledge production and culture. Her Friday talk with us is based on the forthcoming book, The Will to Predict: Orchestrating the Future through Science (Cornell 2023).

The book questions the established view that in the Cold War era scientific prediction was an expression of a positivist mindset and that scientific predictions were mainly used to enhance top-down control by collecting data, monitoring and influencing people’s behaviour. In contrast, this book shows that the role of scientific prediction is far more diverse than that of a mechanistic, top-down control. The book argues that scientific predictions are human attempts to find an adaptive way to cope with uncertainty, to address the limitation of knowledge and to act collectively through the continuous orchestration of human and non-human actors.

Welcome to join:

Friday March 17 @ 14.15 to 16.00
in the Big Seminar Room at the Division, Teknikringen 74D level 5, Stockholm.

From Water to Nuclear to Catastrophe: How Soviet Hydro-nuclear Entanglements Shaped Dangerous Technocratci Safety Culture.

Profile picture of Achim KlüppelbergAchim Klüppelberg started as a doctoral student at the Division in the fall of 2018. He is active in the Nuclearwaters-Project (ERC Consolidator Grant, PI Per Högselius) where he focus on the nuclear history of Eastern Europe, especially on the territory of the former Soviet Union and its successor states. Achim investigates expert cultures in nuclear discourses, with a special interest in water-related issues in nuclear power plant decision-making.

Other than focusing on his doctoral studies, Achim has been active in several of the courses at the Division – as assistant and teacher. He also contributes to educate us in metal (music, that is) and has been one of the editors of the Division blog the past years.

Main supervisor: Per Högselius
Supervisors: Kati Lindström, KTH and Anna Storm, Linköping University

Welcome to join:

Monday March 20 @ 13.15 to 15.00 CET
in the Big Seminar Room at the Division, Teknikringen 74D level 5, Stockholm.

New publication: What is good drinking water?: 41 Years of risk perception on water quality in the vicinity of the Nuclear Research Centre Karlsruhe, 1956–1997

Alicia Gutting is a PhD candidate in the ERC-project Nuclearwaters at the Division of History of Science, Technology and Environment. In her thesis „The Nuclear Rhine“ Alicia is researching transnational nuclear risk perception in Austria, Switzerland, France and Germany from the 1960s to 2018. In January Alicia was published in Risk, Hazards & Crisis in Public Policy with the article What is good drinking water?: 41 Years of risk perception on water quality in the vicinity of the Nuclear Research Centre Karlsruhe, 1956–1997. Follow the link below for open access!

What is good drinking water?: 41 Years of risk perception on water quality in the vicinity of the Nuclear Research Centre Karlsruhe, 1956–1997

In: Risk, Hazards & Crisis in Public Policy, ISSN 1944-4079, E-ISSN 1944-4079, p. 1-23Article in journal (Refereed) Published

Abstract [en]

This article traces the historical evolution of risk perception around the Nuclear Research Centre Karlsruhe, Germany, from 1956 to 1997. It does so by targeting the evolution of water-related risks. Federal hopes in the postwar era that the Nuclear Research Centre would bring progress and prosperity clashed with local values and local perception of nuclear engineering as dangerous to health and the environment. Various conflicts arose and opponents made use of their past lived-knowledge to foster their arguments against future decision-making, mobilizing stories from the past to shape the future. The conflict culminated in the 1990s, when the municipality decided to lease the Centre’s waterworks for future drinking water supply. The main argument of the article is that even though the public discourse shifted over the years from water pollution toward greater risks such as nuclear meltdowns, the local risk perception stayed with the water-related risks. The article shows how the locals perceived and narrated their risk perception against the decision-making of authorities as well as against the reasoning of scientists and experts.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages

Hoboken: Wiley , 2023. p. 1-23

Keywords [en]

drinking water, Rhine river, risk narratives, risk perception, water quality

Mid-seminar in Doctoral Education: Between Internationalism and Nationalism HIV/AIDS response in Mozambique, 1986-2020 with Araújo Domingos

Welcome to join a mid-seminar in doctoral education on zoom!
FEBRUARY 10, 2023,  at 13.15-15.00 CET
Between Internationalism and Nationalism HIV/AIDS response in Mozambique, 1986-2020
Araújo Domingos, PhD Student
Division of History of Science, Technology and Environment
KTH Royal Institute of Technology
Supervisors: Nina Wormbs, Urban Lundberg and Sandra Manuel
Opponent: Henrik Ernstson


Araújo came to the Division in 2018, as a doctoral student in the collaborative project CHEPIS – Strengthening African higher education research and expertise, where the Division has a part. Read more on the project homepage!

Araújo’s main focus is to understand how Mozambique has responded to HIV/AIDS from 1986 to 2020. Email history@abe.kth.se for the zoom link to the seminar!

 

 

 

Breathing Swiss air – A research stay at the University of Bern

Text: Alicia Gutting, doctoral student at the Division

The fun thing about writing a PhD thesis on the nuclear Rhine in Sweden is that it is actually necessary for me to visit the nuclear sites on the Rhine as well as local archives. My three supervisors and I therefore decided that it would be an enriching experience to spend some time at the Section of Economic, Social and Environmental History of the History Department at the University of Bern. In this rather fast-paced academic world, I wanted to get the most out of my stay as well as get to know fellow historians in Bern. Therefore, a three months visit from the beginning of October until the end of December sounded suitable. Having all the archives and the nuclear sites at my doorstep was also a major motivation to stay a little bit longer. 

 My plan was to use the time to focus on finishing two articles. Both these articles deal partially with the Swiss nuclear development as well as cooling water negotiations between Switzerland and Germany and the accompanying risks. I dreamt of being in Switzerland, taking the good air of Bern in and the articles would magically write themselves. This clearly did not happen. However, through a presentation of my work at the history department I received valuable input from Swiss colleagues. Some critical, which I very much appreciated, but mostly very positive and insightful. The discussion showed me that I am on the right track and that my work is still a research desideratum, even in Switzerland. 

The second-last week of my stay in Switzerland was the absolute highlight of the whole three months. My main supervisor Per Högselius took the time to visit me for five days. We started with a day at the state archive in Aarau, where we looked at maps of the Beznau nuclear power plant. Beznau, built in 1969, is an especially interesting case as it is the first Swiss nuclear power plant. It is also the oldest operative nuclear power plant up until today. Apart from that it uses a freshwater cooling system and therefore does not cool the water down with the help of cooling towers. Per and I could take a close look at the significantly warmer water that was led back into the considerably small river Aare. 

The NPP Beznau and one of its cooling water outlets 

Before we visited Beznau, we went to see the newest nuclear power plant Leibstadt, built in 1984. When we just got out of the car, Per received a call from a journalist from the Swedish newspaper Dagens Nyheter. His expertise was requested on the Swedish nuclear power plant Ringhals and the current electricity prices in Sweden. This turned our field trip into a much more current issue than we had originally anticipated. 

Per on the phone while looking at Leibstadt’s cooling tower

On our last day we went to see the Mühleberg nuclear power plant, which was decommissioned in 2019. Mühleberg was built from 1967-1971 also without a cooling tower. For builders of nuclear power plants this was the last chance to build without a cooling tower as Switzerland made them compulsory in 1971. What is also interesting is that Mühleberg is located above Lake Biel and the planners roughly calculated with the lake being able to diffuse the warm cooling water. The hope was that Mühleberg’s cooling water would not interfere with the cooling capacity of the Aare further downstream. 

Mühleberg NPP with the hydro power plant Mühleberg upstream, which secured the cooling water supply

Apart from looking at nuclear power plants and maps of the area, Per and I had also the chance to present our work during a workshop on the nuclear renaissance by the Research Network Sustainable Future at the University of Basel. During the workshop different researchers from all kind of fields presented their findings on nuclear power and its potential future. We got to hear about the ethical side of nuclear power, in what way nuclear power plants are megaprojects and about the entanglement of the industry with the military concerning nuclear in the UK. With our presentation on the risk of warming rivers in a warming climate, we rounded up the theoretical discussions from the morning with case studies from the Rhine, the Elbe and the Danube. 

Wrapping up and planning ahead

This year is soon coming to an end and we are looking back on many memorable happenings, publications and events at the Division. Many you can find in the four newsletters that have been sent throughout the year: Division Newsletters

But as always, in parallel with wrapping up the old year – the new year is also in planning. In 2023 we look forward to some big changes. New projects on Carbon Transnationalism, The EHL will become a KTH Centre and the Division will get a new head. On top of that the administration at KTH is merging into a new organization and we have a new President! Luckily some things are kept as they have been though and one of those is our Higher Seminar series.

This coming spring we look forward to learn more about Nuclear-Water, political ecology and the research seminar as a community of practice. We have four doctoral students that are planning for their final seminars, and three additional that plan for their mid-seminars. Some of the seminars will be held on zoom, but most of them are on site in our own environment. Check out to full schedule here – some updates will come to it – and please drop by if you are in the neighborhood: Higher Seminar Spring 2023