Skip to main content
To KTH's start page To KTH's start page

Performance-based governance in academia

This research programme analyses fundamental mechanisms determining how core professional practices in academia are affected by the introduction of organisational level systems for performance-based allocation of funding.

Funded by: Riksbankens Jubileumsfond, The Swedish Science Council, Forte, Formas
Time period: 2016-2021
Project members: KTH
Project contact persons:

Background:

With academic staff employed at research-intensive Swedish higher education institutions in focus, we study the identity construction of academics in relation to "economistic" forms of organizational governance, and how these interdependent processes affect the behaviour of individuals. In particular, we analyse effects on individuals priorities and time allocation between different activities in their professional activities (within and between broad categories such as teaching, research, leadership and service) and career choices (attractiveness of different types of academic positions in the university sector, attractiveness of jobs in universities vs. in other sectors). In the final phase of the project, theoretical results and empirical findings produced within the context of Swedish academia are related to different institutional settings. That is, we address questions of how and why performance-based funding systems may play out differently in different national settings and identify differences and similarities between higher education institutions and other dedicated research organisations in this respect.

Publications:

  • Ekman, M, Lindgren, M., Packendorff, J. (2018), Universities need leadership, academics need management: discursive tensions and voids in the deregulation of Swedish higher education legislation. Higher Education 75(2):299-321
  • Söderlind, J., & Geschwind, L. (2019). Making sense of academic work: the influence of performance measurement in Swedish universities. Policy Reviews in Higher Education, 3(1), 75-93.
  • Broström, A. (2019). Academic breeding grounds: Home department conditions and early career performance of academic researchers. Research Policy, 48(7), 1647-1665.
  • Zhao, Z., Broström, A., Cai, J., (2020). Promoting academic engagement: university context and individual characteristics. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 45(1), 304-337.
Page responsible:infomaster@itm.kth.se
Belongs to: Industrial Economics and Management
Last changed: May 12, 2021
Title
Men in focus - exploring homosocial cultures in organizations and developing methods to prevent sexual harassment
Creating a better work environment in the home care sector- participatory organizational change in practice
Promoting a hospitality industry free from human trafficking and prostitution – The effects on employees’ work environment
The career-organization nexus. The emergence of gender inequality among Swedish managers
The impact of corporate governance on carbon emissions
Performance-based governance in academia
KTH CSA – Centre for Sustainable Aviation
INFRA – Aviation as an infrastructural system and sociotechnical analysis
BOAUT – Boundaries of AUTonomy
ORION - Operational Risk: Implementing Open Norms
Combining MOOCs and Virtual Worlds to Foster Collaboration between Worldwide Learners
SYSTEMS LOGIC AND BUSINESS MODEL ALIGNMENT IN SMART MAINTENANCE OF INFRASTRUCTURE: Focusing systems for urban water and sewage
The Digital Earth Moving Contractor
Artificial Intelligence and industrial transformations
AI in the media industry
Nordic Observatory of AI (NordAI)
Defining digital excellence
IncluSTEM
AI Sustainability Center (AISC)
Software Development Academy
R&I programme management – organization design and value creation in the High Capacity Transport programme
How to select mutual funds for the Swedish Premium Pension System
From Brownfield to Business
SETA
iSEE
IRIS