Skip to main content

DA256X Degree Project in Computer Science and Engineering, specialising in ICT Innovation, Second Cycle 30.0 credits

The aim of the degree project, also designated independent project, is for the student to apply and deepen knowledge, understanding, abilities and approach within the context of the education. The degree project should be carried out at the end of the education and provide a specialized study and synthesis of earlier acquired knowledge. In the degree project is emphasized both the technical/scientific content and method knowledge.

Choose semester and course offering

Choose semester and course offering to see current information and more about the course, such as course syllabus, study period, and application information.

Application

For course offering

Spring 2025 Start 14 Jan 2025 programme students

Application code

60687

Headings with content from the Course syllabus DA256X (Spring 2020–) are denoted with an asterisk ( )

Content and learning outcomes

Course contents

Before the degree project course is started, the student should identify an appropriate degree project assignment and formulate a project proposal, so that this can be approved by the examiner. The assignment should be chosen so that it implies a natural progression of the knowledge and skills that have been acquired within the education and in a possible specialisation within the education.

  • The student writes an individual plan for the degree project, in which the problem description/assignment and the preconditions for the implementation of the work are specified. 
  • The student carries out an in-depth pre-study including discussions of method choice and theoretical background with a literature study that is reported as part of a draft to a preliminary version of the written degree project report.
  • The student independently carries out a degree project, where knowledge and methods from the education are applied.
  • The student plans and carries out an oral presentation and defence of his or her degree project. 
  • The student carries out an oral and written review of another second-cycle degree project.
  • The student writes and presents a written degree project report, where the student clearly accounts for and discusses own conclusions in the degree project and the knowledge and the arguments that underpin them.
  • The student carries out a self-evaluation of the degree project according to established model.

Intended learning outcomes

After passing the degree project course, the student should be able to:

  • show advanced knowledge within the main field of study/the specialisation for the education, including advanced insight into current research and development work
  • show methodological knowledge within the main field of study/the specialisation for the education
  • participate in research and development work and thereby contribute to the knowledge development
  • with a holistic approach, critically, independently and creatively identify, formulate, analyse, assess and deal with complex phenomena and issues, even with limited information
  • plan and with adequate methods carry out qualified assignments within given frames, and evaluate this work
  • integrate knowledge critically and systematically and identify the need of additional knowledge
  • in Swedish or in English, in speech and writing clearly report and discuss their conclusions and the knowledge and arguments on which they are based
  • within the frames of the degree project identify the role of the scholarship and the engineer in the society
  • within the frame of the specific degree project identify which issues that need to be answered in order to observe relevant dimensions of sustainable development
  • within the frames of the degree project assess and show awareness of ethical aspects of research and development work, with respect to methods, working methods and results of the degree project

in order to be able to participate in research and development or work independently in other qualified activities according to the national aims for a Degree of Master of Science in Engineering and Degree of Master of Science in Higher Education Ordinance.

Literature and preparations

Specific prerequisites

Passed courses at second cycle level of at least 60 credits, including courses that are relevant for the degree project including a course in theory of knowledge and research methodology. 

If the student is registered on an engineering programme should all courses that are required for issuing of Degree of Bachelor be completed.

Recommended prerequisites

No information inserted

Equipment

No information inserted

Literature

No information inserted

Examination and completion

If the course is discontinued, students may request to be examined during the following two academic years.

Grading scale

P, F

Examination

  • PRO1 - Project, 30.0 credits, grading scale: P, F

Based on recommendation from KTH’s coordinator for disabilities, the examiner will decide how to adapt an examination for students with documented disability.

The examiner may apply another examination format when re-examining individual students.

In PRO1 is included

  • individual plan for the degree project
  • pre-study, discussion of method choice and literature study
  • written report with summary/abstract in both swedish and english
  • self-assessment report
  • an oral presentation
  • a written and oral review (public discussion) of another student's second-cycle degree project
  • the final version of the report.

Other requirements for final grade

Active attendance at two oral presentations of degree projects for second-cycle studies.

All examination part should be approved within a year from the start of the degree project. Otherwise, the degree project will be ended with a failed grade, unless special circumstances apply.

Opportunity to complete the requirements via supplementary examination

No information inserted

Opportunity to raise an approved grade via renewed examination

No information inserted

Examiner

Profile picture Peter Sjödin

Profile picture Aristides Gionis

Profile picture Benoit Baudry

Profile picture Leif Handberg

Profile picture Kristina Höök

Profile picture Olof Bälter

Profile picture Dejan Manojlo Kostic

Profile picture Ahmed Hemani

Profile picture Markus Hidell

Profile picture Elena Dubrova

Profile picture Pontus Johnson

Profile picture Rolf Stadler

Profile picture Cristian Bogdan

Profile picture Saikat Chatterjee

Profile picture Gabriel Skantze

Profile picture Joakim Gustafsson

Profile picture Carlo Fischione

Profile picture Roberto Bresin

Profile picture Marco Chiesa

Profile picture Emil Björnson

Profile picture Vladimir Vlassov

Profile picture Amir Hossein Payberah

Profile picture David Broman

Profile picture György Dán

Profile picture Cicek Cavdar

Profile picture Johan Montelius

Profile picture Anders Hedman

Profile picture Haibo Li

Profile picture Mario Romero Vega

Profile picture Tino Weinkauf

Profile picture Ylva Fernaeus

Profile picture Anders Västberg

Profile picture Henrik Artman

Profile picture Rob Comber

Profile picture Sandra Pauletto

Profile picture Marina Petrova

Profile picture Sarunas Girdzijauskas

Profile picture Fredrik Kilander

Profile picture Ingo Sander

Profile picture Slimane Ben Slimane

Profile picture Elina Eriksson

Profile picture Olov Engwall

Profile picture Iolanda Dos Santos Carvalho Leite

Profile picture Gunnar Karlsson

Profile picture Mira Kajko-Mattsson

Profile picture Henrik Boström

Profile picture Eva-Lotta Sallnäs Pysander

Profile picture Johnny Öberg

Profile picture Viktoria Fodor

Profile picture Anne Håkansson

Profile picture Ann Lantz

Profile picture Elena Troubitsyna

Profile picture Leif Dahlberg

Profile picture Robert Rönngren

Profile picture Jörg Conradt

Profile picture Jan Gulliksen

Profile picture Zhonghai Lu

Profile picture Bobby Lee Townsend Sturm JR

Profile picture Markus Flierl

Profile picture Stefano Markidis

Profile picture Madeline Balaam

Profile picture Danica Kragic Jensfelt

Profile picture Mihhail Matskin

Profile picture Panagiotis Papadimitratos

Profile picture Jan Ingemar Markendahl

Profile picture James Gross

Ethical approach

  • All members of a group are responsible for the group's work.
  • In any assessment, every student shall honestly disclose any help received and sources used.
  • In an oral assessment, every student shall be able to present and answer questions about the entire assignment and solution.

Further information

Course room in Canvas

Registered students find further information about the implementation of the course in the course room in Canvas. A link to the course room can be found under the tab Studies in the Personal menu at the start of the course.

Offered by

Main field of study

Computer Science and Engineering

Education cycle

Second cycle

Add-on studies

No information inserted

Supplementary information

In this course, the EECS code of honor applies, see:

http://www.kth.se/en/eecs/utbildning/hederskodex.