KTH Logo

Time for the state to act on AI research

In an article published in Dagens Industri on 30 September, Björn Rosengren argues that the government has abdicated its responsibility for AI research. This is an important and clear contribution to the debate on AI. KTH is ready to take responsibility for its part.

The debate on AI has become increasingly heated recently, with a wide range of comments on the necessary actions in various sectors and the responsibility of policymakers in addressing this fundamental societal issue. Rosengren highlights something that we at the universities have recognised for a long time. The Swedish AI debate focuses on data centres and energy, the need for venture capital, scaling up new business ideas and reforming primary and secondary education. All of this is necessary. However, the latest AI breakthroughs in fields such as mathematics demonstrate how quickly the conditions for research itself are evolving. Without world-class research and the people it trains, the infrastructure becomes empty and has no future.

New methods emerge and the next generation of engineers and researchers is shaped in research environments. It is also there that businesses and society can access the expertise needed to use AI wisely and responsibly. Unlike many other stakeholders, universities are not merely subject to the AI revolution. We have the capacity to create, drive and steer the development that is now unfolding at an ever-increasing pace.

Sweden has been fortunate in many ways. Private initiatives, not least the investments of the Wallenberg Foundations, have laid a strong foundation. However, private forces cannot fully replace the government’s long-term responsibility. The countries we compare ourselves to are now investing vigorously and strategically. If we do not match their levels of investment, we will lose both researchers and competitiveness, and it will take a long time to recover from that loss.

As soon as it takes office, the new government will have an opportunity to demonstrate its leadership. It will require courage to provide long-term and predictable resources for AI research, graduate education and the computational capacity that this research requires. KTH and Sweden’s other universities are ready to play our part. Now, policymakers must take a significant step forward by creating long-term conditions that extend beyond government formations, campaign promises and annual budget decisions.

AI races ahead while campus estate management stalls

Surely everyone has noticed that an AI revolution is currently underway. This technological shift will bring about major changes, even if we currently find it difficult to grasp the full extent of what is happening.

This is often the case with major technological shifts. When the steam engine, electricity or the telephone first appeared, it was also hard to predict the societal changes that would follow.

AI, on the other hand, is not new. Research has been ongoing for decades, but it is only in recent years that its applications have had a widespread impact. Today, we recognise that research methods will also undergo fundamental change. With the help of AI, increasingly complex research problems can be formulated and solved more quickly than ever before. Large volumes of data can be processed rapidly, and scientific breakthroughs that would otherwise have taken years can now be achieved much more quickly thanks to access to advanced computing power.

AI is already transforming research methods, as well as the conditions for business and the public sector. Complex problems can be analysed more quickly, large volumes of data can be handled more efficiently, and new products and services are emerging at a rapid pace.

Universities have a special role to play in this development. On the one hand, the new knowledge on which AI is based is generated through successful research. On the other hand, AI is transforming the content of education and research itself. We must remain at the forefront of knowledge development while also finding time to study and address the ethical, environmental, and social consequences of this technological shift.

Universities suddenly find themselves at the centre of a technological arms race in a geopolitically turbulent world where science, diplomacy and international conflicts are intertwined in ways that politics, academia and the business sector are not accustomed to dealing with. This therefore requires rigorous yet agile and adaptable analysis, along with clear priorities, so that Sweden and Europe can take responsibility, foster independence, and reduce vulnerability.

If I had written about this topic a year ago, or were to write about it a year from now, the text would be completely different, simply because developments are moving so rapidly. This is in stark contrast to another topic I often write about: akademiska hus and the provision of university premises. In that area, developments are so slow that every piece of writing on the subject seems just as relevant year after year. Imagine if it were the other way around 🙂

Developments hardly ever take a summer break, but I hope that many of you will have the chance to do so. Summer greetings from Almedalen!