KTH Logo

We tend to put aside writing and supervision of doctoral students

In English further down. (Photo: Anneli Nygårds)

Lätt att tappa bort skrivande och handledning av doktorander

Jag misstänker att många liksom jag känner att arbetsdagarna för tillfället fylls av otaliga möten och föreläsningar på Zoom och Teams, alltför ofta utan några längre pauser. Även om de flesta aktiviteterna online fungerar alldeles utmärkt rent tekniskt är det lätt att sakna den vanliga vardagens miljöombyten, tillfälliga avbrott och spontana möten med kollegor och studenter. Jag hoppas givetvis att vi om ett par månader ska ha tagit oss igenom den här pandemin och successivt återgå till en mer normal vardag, men tills vi är där får vi gemensamt göra det bästa för att hålla arbetsglädjen uppe och klara av våra uppgifter på bästa möjliga sätt.

Att få grundutbildningen att fungera väl trots omständigheterna kräver för tillfället en hel del tid och ansträngning och en konsekvens av det är att det just nu riskerar bli lite mindre tid än vanligt för annat. Från min egen forskning om innovationsledning känner jag igen att det som uppfattas som brådskande väldigt ofta tränger ut aktiviteter som har lite längre ledtid, som exempelvis forskning och innovation. Att se till att vår grundutbildning fungerar så väl det bara är möjligt är förstås av allra största vikt, men det är viktigt att vi i ivern att ge bra kurser inte tappar bort artikelskrivande och handledning av doktorander. En del av våra doktorander har just nu svårt att genomföra sin forskning enligt plan då de inte har möjlighet att utföra viss datainsamling. För att minimera de negativa effekterna av pandemin på forskarutbildningen är det därför viktigt att vi månar om att så långt det bara går hitta tillräckligt med tid för handledning och skrivande. Tydliga mål rörande artikelförfattande och reserverad tid för handledning är två enkla sätt att balansera kortsiktiga och långsiktiga aktiviteter, men givetvis måste det ske utan att den totala arbetsmängden fullständigt skjuter i höjden.

En del av forskarutbildningen som förhoppningsvis inte blir alltför lidande av pandemin är forskarutbildningskurserna. Dessa kan i många fall ges online med bibehållen kvalitet och distansundervisning gör det även enklare att följa kurser på andra lärosäten. För tillfället sker det en hel del arbete med dessa kurser på ITM, för att vi framöver ska ha både ett större kursutbud och högre regelbundenhet i deras genomförande. En viktig del i det arbetet är också att vi blir bättre på att utvärdera och förbättra forskarutbildningskurserna. I nuläget utvärderas inte alla kurser men för att kunna bedriva ett effektivt förbättringsarbete behöver vi göra det till rutin. Det underlag som skapas kommer att vara värdefullt för framtida utvärderingar, men först och främst ger det oss bättre möjligheter att lära och utveckla våra utbildningar.

/ Mats Magnusson, Forskarutbildningsansvarig på ITM-skolan

We tend to put aside writing and supervision of doctoral students

More time to get the first and second cycle education going and less time to other long-term activities. That can be the consequence for many researchers in the current pandemic, according to Mats Magnusson, responsible for ITM’s doctoral studies.

I guess that many, like me, feel that the working days are filled with countless meetings and lectures at Zoom and Teams at the moment, too often without longer breaks. Although most online activities work very well technically, it is easy to miss the usual everyday change of scenery, temporary interruptions and spontaneous meetings with colleagues and students. Of course, I hope that we in a couple of months are on the other side of this pandemic and gradually will return to a more normal everyday life; but until then, we can do our best together to keep the job satisfaction and manage our tasks in the best possible way.

Making the first and second cycle education work, despite the circumstances, currently requires a lot of time and effort, and a consequence of this is the risk that there will be a little less time for other things than usually. From my own research on innovation management, I recognize that what we perceive as urgent very often pushes out activities that have a slightly longer lead-time, such as research and innovation. Ensuring that our undergraduate education works as well as possible is of course essential, but it is important that we in the zeal to give good courses do not lose paper writing and supervision of doctoral students. Some of our doctoral students are currently finding it difficult to accomplish their research according to plan as they do not have the opportunity to carry out certain data collection. In order to minimize the negative effects of the pandemic on postgraduate education, it is therefore important to find enough time for supervision and writing as far as possible. Clear objectives regarding paper writing and blocked time for supervision are two simple ways to balance short-term and long-term activities, but of course, this must be done without the total amount of work completely skyrocketing.

One part of the postgraduate education that hopefully does not suffer too much from the pandemic are the PhD courses. These can be given online in many cases with maintained quality; also, distance learning makes it easier to follow courses at other universities. At the moment, a lot of work is being done with these courses at ITM, so that we in the future will have both a larger range of courses and higher regularity in their delivery. It is also essential that we get better at evaluating and improving postgraduate courses. Right now, not all courses are evaluated, but in order to be able to conduct effective improvement work, we need to make it a routine. The data that is created will be valuable for future evaluations, but first and foremost it gives us better opportunities to learn and develop our educations.

/ Mats Magnusson, Director of Third-Cycle Education at ITM

The pandemic may delay doctoral studies

In English further down.

Forskarstudier kan försenas på grund av pandemin

Kära kollega,

Jag hoppas först och främst att du mår väl och att den pågående pandemin inte orsakar alltför stora svårigheter i ditt vardagliga arbete. Jag har själv haft förmånen att ha ”vanliga” föreläsningar i sal i en av de kurser jag håller i denna läsperiod och trots att det finns vissa begränsningar och givetvis krävs en del extra säkerhetsåtgärder är det härligt att träffa studenter igen.

Vi har nu levt med nya arbetsförhållanden i ett drygt halvår och även om vi i många avseenden säkert vant oss vid digitalt hemarbete och skapat nya vardagsrutiner så tror jag att de flesta av oss allt mer saknar den vardagliga interaktionen med kollegorna. Just i detta avseende är många av våra forskarstuderande speciellt utsatta då de inte alltid har ett stort socialt nätverk utanför arbetet och således kan uppleva större problem med upplevd ensamhet och relaterade effekter såsom stress och psykisk ohälsa. Jag skulle därför vilja rikta en uppmaning till samtliga handledare att reflektera kring former och frekvens i handledningen och eventuellt göra vissa förändringar som säkerställer att våra forskarstuderande får den uppmärksamhet och det stöd de behöver under den rådande situationen.

En del forskningsverksamhet är för närvarande svår eller rent av omöjlig att genomföra och det drabbar såväl forskarstuderande som mer seniora forskare. Givet de tidsbegränsningar som finns för forskarstudierna är det viktigt att fånga upp och dokumentera de fall där det finns en risk att studierna måste förlängas på grund av förseningar till följd av pandemin. I första hand ska vi givetvis försöka att planera om vårt arbete så att eventuella förseningar minimeras, men om det inte går att undvika är det viktigt att de problem och förseningar som uppstått dokumenteras i doktorandens e-ISP efter diskussioner med handledare.

På KTH är vi medvetna om att det kommer att uppstå förseningar för en del doktorander och Covid-19 betraktas som ett särskilt skäl för förlängning av studierna. Det finns dock inga avsatta medel för dessa förlängningar och det ska understrykas att varje fall kommer att prövas individuellt för att kontrollera att en försening faktiskt varit oundviklig. För mer information om detta vill jag hänvisa till ytterligare information på KTH’s intranät.

Vad gäller vår forskarutbildning i övrigt kan jag konstatera att den i stort fortlöper som vanligt, tack vare handledares och forskarstuderandes goda insatser. Disputationer och licentiatseminarierna genomförs fortfarande via Zoom, något som faktiskt haft en positiv effekt på deltagande även om det ibland gör att dynamiken mellan opponent och respondent blir lite mer begränsad. Förhoppningsvis kommer vi inom en rimlig framtid återigen kunna hålla disputationer med ett större antal fysiskt närvarande deltagare, men givet erfarenheterna från digitala dito är vi nog många som i framtiden vill använda Zoom som ett komplement.

/ Mats Magnusson, Forskarutbildningsansvarig ITM

Doctoral studies may be delayed due to the pandemic

Dear Colleagues,

First of all, I hope that you are all doing well and that the ongoing pandemic isn’t causing too much difficulty in your everyday work. I myself have had the privilege of conducting “normal”, on-site lectures in one of the courses I am holding during this study period, and although there are certain limitations and of course some extra security measures are necessary, it’s wonderful to interact in-person with students again.

We have now been living with new working conditions for over six months, and although in many respects we have certainly become accustomed to digital homework and created new everyday routines, I think that most of us increasingly miss our everyday interaction with colleagues. In this particular respect, many of our doctoral students are especially vulnerable, as they do not always have a large social network outside of work and thus may experience major problems with feelings of loneliness and related effects such as stress and mental illness. I would therefore like to call on all supervisors to reflect on the forms and frequency of their supervision sessions, and possibly make certain changes that ensure that our doctoral students receive the attention and support they need in the current situation.

It is currently difficult or even impossible to carry out certain research activities, and this affects both doctoral students and more senior researchers. Given the time constraints that exist for doctoral studies, it is important to identify and document cases where there is a risk that the studies will need to be extended due to delays resulting from the pandemic. In the first place we will of course try to reschedule our work to minimise any delays, but if they prove impossible to avoid, it is important that the problems and delays that have occurred are documented in the doctoral student’s e-ISP after discussions with her/his supervisors.

Here at KTH, we are aware that some doctoral students will experience delays, and COVID-19 is considered a special reason for extending one’s studies. However, there are no funds set aside for these extensions, and it should be stressed that each case will be examined individually to verify that a delay has actually been unavoidable. For more information on this subject, please refer to additional information on the KTH intranet.

As far as our third-cycle education in general is concerned, I can say that it is proceeding as usual, thanks to the great efforts of our supervisors and doctoral students. Doctoral thesis defences and licentiate seminars continue to be conducted via Zoom, which has actually had a positive effect on participation, although it sometimes makes the dynamic between opponent and respondent a little more limited. Hopefully, within the not-too-distant future we will once again be able to hold thesis defences with a larger number of physically present participants, but in light of our experiences with the digital format, in the future many of us will probably want to use Zoom as a complementary element.

/ Mats Magnusson, Director of Third-Cycle Education at ITM

 

Research studies under unusual circumstances

It’s now been over two months since we all started working mostly from home. Everything is very different now, and I myself would have organized a conference last week. To still “meet” some of those who would have been here from all over the world, we had a Swedish fika via Zoom Friday afternoon. Everyone had promised to make really strong Swedish coffee to drink in front of the computer.

While some like the new working situation, others feel lonely. It is perhaps most difficult for those who are far from their home country, especially many doctoral students. Therefore it is important for us supervisors to keep in close contact with our doctoral students, not only for the research to continue as well as possible, but perhaps primarily for the human contact.

The research studies that can go on more or less as usual are the ones that are mostly performed in front of a computer. It’s more difficult when experiments are required and worst of all if the planned experiments were intended to take place outside Sweden. Hopefully we can return to more normal research studies this fall.

PhD defences and licentiate seminars have since March 25th, when we had the first digital defence with the respondent on link from South Africa, been held on Zoom. We have so far managed about ten PhD defences and one licentiate seminar and have another 15 to look forward to before the summer break begins. It has overall worked out very well and I see ahead that we, post-corona, will make sure to broadcast our events – we can then certainly expect a larger and more international audience. But clearly it will be nice when we can celebrate the new doctors IRL as well.

I will take the opportunity to give an update of the responsible persons for our doctoral programmes, DAs:

  • Luca Urciuoli new DA for Industrial Economics and Management
  • Stefan Hrastinski new DA for Education and Communication Studies
  • Lyuba Belova new DA for Education and Communication Studies

Find all DAs at ITM here

/ Malin Selleby, Director of Third Cycle Education at ITM

An ITM sustainability course for PhD students

There is for obvious reasons a lot of focus on sustainability. Within the Postgraduate education committee (Forskarutbildningsutskottet), consisting of the professors responsible for our six doctoral programmes and myself, an idea has emerged: to develop a course in sustainability for doctoral students. The intention is to do the course as collaborative effort between all our departments. I presented the idea at the Faculty Club and have since then been contacted by teachers interested in such a course. Shortly we’ll form a group to discuss how to proceed. If you are interested – please send me an email!

On the same theme – I hope that all supervisor and PhD students are aware of that they need to comment on the coupling between their own research and the 17 UN Sustainable Development Goals in each individual study plan – tab 10 under C2.

As many of you already know, all managers at ITM are now taking part in a course – Leadership development from a gender perspective. Maybe you have been asked to go out on “Culture reconnaissance” (kulturspaning) in your own working environment? To work towards, and focus on gender equality, is also part of developing a sustainable future. So, please – go out and “kulturspana”!

/Malin Selleby, Director of Third Cycle Education at the ITM School

ITM PhD Student Conference

Last Wednesday and Thursday (on April 10-11) we had the annual ITM PhD student conference at Skogshem and Wijk on Lindingö. The theme this year was equality (JML) and sustainability. Alice Marshall gave an introduction to “one KTH” followed by several group exercises/discussions. In one of them we were all supposed to stand in different corners divided in how equal we think our working environment is on a scale between 1 and 10, 10 being perfect in terms of gender equality. The choice of “environment” could be the closest group or even the whole of KTH. It was interesting to see that we were spread out between 8-9 to 2-3.

Sara Linderson shortly presented the new platform, Industrial Transformation, a platform that will coordinate all KTH researchers that in different ways support the transformation to a sustainable CO2-neutral industry. The manager of the platform is Monica Bellgran, KTH Södertälje.

In the evening, beforea very nice dinner, there was a poster session with the goal to bridge the gap between different research fields i.e. find a PhD student colleague in another area where there is some overlap of interest.

In the morning of the second day Ulf Sandström gave a lecture about the Vancouver Rules on Publishing. The rules discuss “Who Is an Author?” and the following four criteria must be fulfilled for any author:

  1. Substantial contributions to the conception or design of the work; or the acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data for the work; AND
  2. Drafting the work or revising it critically for important intellectual content; AND
  3. Final approval of the version to be published; AND
  4. Agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.

This is something for the students to discuss in their respective research environments and with their supervisors. It think that it is important not to be too interested in the ranking lists but to make sure that authorship and citations are treated in a correct way.

After a coffee break Hélène Hermansson gave a talk about sustainability and the 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDG:s) and asked the participants to think and discuss how these goals can connect to their own research, both in a positive and negative ways.

The SDG:s can be found here.

Thank you all lecturers, DAs and participants!